Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of a Live Yeast Culture and Enzymes on In Vitro Ruminal Fermentation and Milk Production of Dairy Cows

      , , , , , , ,
      Journal of Dairy Science
      American Dairy Science Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Live yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) grew best on malt extract agar and required incubation under aerobic conditions to maximize the number of viable cells. In sterile, anaerobic ruminal fluid that had been supplemented with malt extract, yeast cells remained viable and metabolically active for up to 48 h, as indicated by the production of ethanol. A supplement containing live yeast and enzymes was fed twice daily with a diet of 50:50 (wt/wt) forage to concentrate (dry matter basis) to continuous fermentors inoculated with mixed ruminal microorganisms. The supplement had no effect on major fermentation acids or pH. After the last supplement with yeast was fed, numbers of yeast immediately decreased in the fermentors and were not detectable after 24 h. In the first of two lactation experiments, Holstein cows in midlactation were offered a diet with corn silage as the primary forage source. Half of the cows received a top-dressing based on corn that contained 10 g/d of the yeast and enzyme supplement. The supplement had no effect on milk production, milk composition, or dry matter intake. In a second lactation experiment, high producing cows in early lactation were fed 0, 10, and 20 g/d of the supplement. Cows fed the control diet produced 36.4 kg of milk/d, and milk production was 39.3 and 38.0 kg/d from cows fed 10 and 20 g of yeast/d, respectively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of yeast culture supplement on production, rumen fermentation, and duodenal nitrogen flow in dairy cows.

          Six lactating Holstein cows fitted with rumen and T-type duodenal cannulas were used in a crossover design to examine effects of yeast culture supplement on production parameters, rumen fermentation, and flow of N to the duodenum. Treatments were control and control plus 10 g/d of yeast culture. Dry matter intake was greater, and milk production tended to be higher, for cows supplemented with yeast culture, but milk composition was not affected. Rumen pH was not affected by yeast culture, but peak lactic acid concentration decreased from 1.93 to 1.73 mM. Rumen fluid acetate:propionate ratio, dilution rate (percentage per hour), and ammonia N concentration (milligrams per deciliter) were 2.28, .12, and 10.7 and 2.04, .13, and 9.6 for control cows and for cows supplemented with yeast culture, respectively. Although numbers of fiber-digesting bacteria were not affected by yeast culture, DM disappearance of wheat straw tended to be higher at 12 and 24 h, and CP and ADF digestibilities were greater. Duodenal NAN flow tended to be higher in cows supplemented with yeast culture because of higher bacterial N flow. Duodenal AA profile and flow of Met were significantly affected by yeast culture supplementation. The results suggest that yeast culture may alter the AA profile of bacterial protein.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae cultures on ruminal fermentation in dairy cows.

            I Yoon, M Stern (1996)
            Four lactating Holstein cows, fitted with ruminal and duodenal cannulas, were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design to examine the effects of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and fungal (Aspergillus oryzae) cultures on ruminal fermentation, microbial populations, and nutrient supply to the small intestine. Cows were fed a basal diet comprising 32.5% corn silage, 17.5% alfalfa hay, 35.3% corn grain, 12.7% soybean meal, and 2% vitamin and mineral mixture on a DM basis. Treatments were arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial as follows: 1) basal diet, 2) basal diet plus 57 g/d of yeast culture, 3) basal diet plus 3 g/d of fungal culture, and 4) basal diet plus 57 g/d of yeast culture and 3 g/d of fungal culture. Ruminal pH, ammonia N concentration, and total VFA concentration were similar among treatments. Molar percentages of ruminal isoacids were lower for cows fed a mixture of yeast and fungal culture than for cows fed yeast or fungal culture alone. Yeast culture increased ruminal OM and CP digestion and decreased OM and N flow to the duodenum. Fiber digestion in the rumen was similar among treatments. Fungal culture stimulated proteolytic and cellulolytic bacterial counts. Proteolytic bacterial counts were also stimulated by yeast culture. Results from this experiment demonstrated that yeast and fungal cultures could influence ruminal fermentation and microbial populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Dairy Science
                Journal of Dairy Science
                American Dairy Science Association
                00220302
                September 1997
                September 1997
                : 80
                : 9
                : 2045-2051
                Article
                10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76149-6
                9313146
                905d80ad-b142-431e-99c8-531d291b1fb1
                © 1997
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,297

                Cited by17

                Most referenced authors156