84
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 7 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 8 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 9 , 1 , 6 , 5 , 8 , 10 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 8 , 10 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 5 , 11 , 12 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , # , 1
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Elucidating the cellular architecture of the human cerebral cortex is central to understanding our cognitive abilities and susceptibility to disease. Here we applied single nucleus RNA-sequencing to perform a comprehensive analysis of cell types in the middle temporal gyrus of human cortex. We identified a highly diverse set of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal types that are mostly sparse, with excitatory types being less layer-restricted than expected. Comparison to similar mouse cortex single cell RNA-sequencing datasets revealed a surprisingly well-conserved cellular architecture that enables matching of homologous types and predictions of human cell type properties. Despite this general conservation, we also find extensive differences between homologous human and mouse cell types, including dramatic alterations in proportions, laminar distributions, gene expression, and morphology. These species-specific features emphasize the importance of directly studying human brain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders.

          Modeling of human neuropsychiatric disorders in animals is extremely challenging given the subjective nature of many symptoms, the lack of biomarkers and objective diagnostic tests, and the early state of the relevant neurobiology and genetics. Nonetheless, progress in understanding pathophysiology and in treatment development would benefit greatly from improved animal models. Here we review the current state of animal models of mental illness, with a focus on schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder. We argue for areas of focus that might increase the likelihood of creating more useful models, at least for some disorders, and for explicit guidelines when animal models are reported.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification.

            Genes are often characterized dichotomously as either housekeeping or single-tissue specific. We conjectured that crucial functional information resides in genes with midrange profiles of expression. To obtain such novel information genome-wide, we have determined the mRNA expression levels for one of the largest hitherto analyzed set of 62 839 probesets in 12 representative normal human tissues. Indeed, when using a newly defined graded tissue specificity index tau, valued between 0 for housekeeping genes and 1 for tissue-specific genes, genes with midrange profiles having 0.15 50% of all expression patterns. We developed a binary classification, indicating for every gene the I(B) tissues in which it is overly expressed, and the 12-I(B) tissues in which it shows low expression. The 85 dominant midrange patterns with I(B)=2-11 were found to be bimodally distributed, and to contribute most significantly to the definition of tissue specification dendrograms. Our analyses provide a novel route to infer expression profiles for presumed ancestral nodes in the tissue dendrogram. Such definition has uncovered an unsuspected correlation, whereby de novo enhancement and diminution of gene expression go hand in hand. These findings highlight the importance of gene suppression events, with implications to the course of tissue specification in ontogeny and phylogeny. All data and analyses are publically available at the GeneNote website, http://genecards.weizmann.ac.il/genenote/ and, GEO accession GSE803. doron.lancet@weizmann.ac.il Four tables available at the above site.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Uniquely hominid features of adult human astrocytes.

              Defining the microanatomic differences between the human brain and that of other mammals is key to understanding its unique computational power. Although much effort has been devoted to comparative studies of neurons, astrocytes have received far less attention. We report here that protoplasmic astrocytes in human neocortex are 2.6-fold larger in diameter and extend 10-fold more GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein)-positive primary processes than their rodent counterparts. In cortical slices prepared from acutely resected surgical tissue, protoplasmic astrocytes propagate Ca(2+) waves with a speed of 36 microm/s, approximately fourfold faster than rodent. Human astrocytes also transiently increase cystosolic Ca(2+) in response to glutamatergic and purinergic receptor agonists. The human neocortex also harbors several anatomically defined subclasses of astrocytes not represented in rodents. These include a population of astrocytes that reside in layers 5-6 and extend long fibers characterized by regularly spaced varicosities. Another specialized type of astrocyte, the interlaminar astrocyte, abundantly populates the superficial cortical layers and extends long processes without varicosities to cortical layers 3 and 4. Human fibrous astrocytes resemble their rodent counterpart but are larger in diameter. Thus, human cortical astrocytes are both larger, and structurally both more complex and more diverse, than those of rodents. On this basis, we posit that this astrocytic complexity has permitted the increased functional competence of the adult human brain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                7 November 2019
                21 August 2019
                September 2019
                18 December 2019
                : 573
                : 7772
                : 61-68
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA
                [2 ]Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
                [5 ]J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
                [6 ]Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
                [7 ]The Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
                [8 ]Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
                [9 ]Epilepsy Surgery and Functional Neurosurgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
                [10 ]Regional Epilepsy Center at Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
                [11 ]Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
                [12 ]Neurotechnology Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                [# ]Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Ed Lein ( edl@ 123456alleninstitute.org )
                [*]

                Contributed equally

                Author Contributions

                E.S.L conceptualized and supervised the study. E.S.L. and R.Y. conceptualized the Human Cell Types Program. R.D.H and T.E.B. designed experiments. R.D.H., E.R.B., B. Long., J.L.C., B.P.L., S.I.S., K.B, J.G., D.H., S.L.D., M.M., S.P., E.R.T, N.V.S., and Z.M. contributed to nuclei isolation and/or validation experiments. T.E.B. and J.A.M. analyzed the data with contributions from N.J., O.P., Z.Y., O.F., J.G., S.S., G.Q., and M.H. K.A.S. and B.T. managed the single-nucleus RNA-seq pipeline. L.T.G. developed data visualization tools. D.B., K.L., C.R, and M.T. performed single-nucleus RNA-seq. A. Bernard and J.W.P. managed establishment of single-nucleus RNA-seq pipeline. A. Bernard and M.M contributed to the development and management of histological methods and data generation. R.D., N.D., T.C., J.N., A.O. processed postmortem brain tissues. A. Bernard and N.D. managed acquisition of postmortem and neurosurgical tissues. A. Beller, C.D.K, C.C., R.G.E., R.P.G., A.L.K, and J.G.O. contributed to neurosurgical tissue collections. B.A., M.K., and R.H.S. developed the semantic representation of clusters. J.E., T.H., A.M., and B. Lelieveldt developed the Cytosplore Viewer. L.T.G., J.A.M., D.F., L.N, and A.Bernard contributed to the development of the RNA-Seq Data Navigator. S.R., A.S., and S.M.S. provided program management and/or regulatory compliance support. C.K. and A.R.J. provided institutional support and project oversight. E.S.L. and H.Z. directed the Allen Institute Cell Types Program. R.D.H., T.E.B., and E.S.L. wrote the paper with contributions from J.A.M and J.L.C., and in consultation with all authors.

                Article
                NIHMS1535018
                10.1038/s41586-019-1506-7
                6919571
                31435019
                903ce59b-1301-4907-9028-6e1dec9205ef

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article