0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of the flexibility of various splinting methods for tooth fixation.

      1
      International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An experimental model was constructed to test the flexibility of the arch bar splint and the Schuchardt splint as compared with a newly introduced wire-composite splint. Vertical movement in 4 flexible incisors was tested by producing compressive forces between 15-95 Newtons on the incisal edges. The thinnest wire-composite splint was also tested for lateral flexibility by producing palatal forces from 2 angles. Movement without the splint served as the control. The tests showed that a 0.3 mm thick wire-composite splint had the flexibility closest to the control, followed by the arch bar splint, and 0.4 mm and 0.5 mm wire-composite splints, while the Schuchardt splint virtually prevented vertical movement. Lateral movement was markedly reduced by the 0.3 mm wire-composite splint as compared with the control with both a 10 degree and a 45 degree force. The experiments showed that a 0.3 mm wire-composite splint can be regarded as acting as a functional fixation allowing slight vertical movement of the teeth during immobilisation; it should be recommended for tooth fixation whenever possible.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
          International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
          Elsevier BV
          0901-5027
          0901-5027
          Apr 1988
          : 17
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu, Finland.
          Article
          10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80166-8
          3133422
          8f3ec596-d3f5-42a3-923e-e42a9a6372d5
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article