5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nature or nurture: a genetic basis for the behavioral selection of depth in siscowet and lean lake char ( Salvelinus namaycush) ecomorphs

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
      Canadian Science Publishing

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Leans and siscowets are lake char ecomorphs in Lake Superior that exhibit distinct depth selection behavior in the wild with leans occupying shallow (<50 m) depths and undergoing small vertical movements. In contrast, siscowets exhibit several types of depth selection behavior but generally remain at great depths (>80 m) and undergo extreme vertical movements. The present study used movement and temperature data from popup satellite archival tags (PSATs) to test the hypothesis that the difference in depth selection behavior of leans and siscowets is a genetic trait. Laboratory leans and siscowets produced from wild gametes taken from Lake Superior and reared in a common garden study for nine years were tagged with PSATs and released in southern Lake Superior. Tagged siscowets remained deep after release and exhibited extensive vertical movements. Most tagged leans remained <50 m after deployment and exhibited smaller vertical movements. Overall, the depths and temperatures occupied by the laboratory ecomorphs were significantly different throughout the deployment and the results support the hypothesis that depth selection in lake char ecomorphs is heritable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

          How should ecologists and evolutionary biologists analyze nonnormal data that involve random effects? Nonnormal data such as counts or proportions often defy classical statistical procedures. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) provide a more flexible approach for analyzing nonnormal data when random effects are present. The explosion of research on GLMMs in the last decade has generated considerable uncertainty for practitioners in ecology and evolution. Despite the availability of accurate techniques for estimating GLMM parameters in simple cases, complex GLMMs are challenging to fit and statistical inference such as hypothesis testing remains difficult. We review the use (and misuse) of GLMMs in ecology and evolution, discuss estimation and inference and summarize 'best-practice' data analysis procedures for scientists facing this challenge.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Resource polymorphisms in vertebrates.

            Discrete resource polymorphisms occur in various vertebrate species and probably occur more frequently than is generally appreciated. They are manifested in a number of ways, including morphological, behavioral and life history characters. Research on a number of unrelated taxa suggests that resource polymorphisms may be underestimated as a diversifying force and potentially play important roles in population divergence and initial steps in speciation. In an ecological context, they are important in resource partitioning and reducing intraspecific competition. Recent research suggests that the mechanisms maintaining these polymorphisms may be similar in diverse taxa, that phenotypic plasticity is important, and that some are under simple genetic control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild

              Accumulating data indicate that hatchery fish have lower fitness in natural environments than wild fish. This fitness decline can occur very quickly, sometimes following only one or two generations of captive rearing. In this review, we summarize existing data on the fitness of hatchery fish in the wild, and we investigate the conditions under which rapid fitness declines can occur. The summary of studies to date suggests: nonlocal hatchery stocks consistently reproduce very poorly in the wild; hatchery stocks that use wild, local fish for captive propagation generally perform better than nonlocal stocks, but often worse than wild fish. However, the data above are from a limited number of studies and species, and more studies are needed before one can generalize further. We used a simple quantitative genetic model to evaluate whether domestication selection is a sufficient explanation for some observed rapid fitness declines. We show that if selection acts on a single trait, such rapid effects can be explained only when selection is very strong, both in captivity and in the wild, and when the heritability of the trait under selection is high. If selection acts on multiple traits throughout the life cycle, rapid fitness declines are plausible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
                Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.
                Canadian Science Publishing
                0706-652X
                1205-7533
                March 01 2023
                March 01 2023
                : 80
                : 3
                : 517-532
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 600 East Greenfield Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53204, USA
                [2 ]Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Marquette Fisheries Research Station, 484 Cherry Creek Rd, Marquette, MI, 49855, USA
                [3 ]U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Ashland Fish & Wildlife Conservation Office, 2800 Lake Shore Drive East, Ashland, WI, 54806, USA
                [4 ]School of Aquatic and Fishery Science, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA, 98195-5020, USA
                Article
                10.1139/cjfas-2022-0104
                8da2f892-a79c-4c29-9abb-7e10afacd40b
                © 2023

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article