Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Central bank digital currency research around the world: a review of literature

      Journal of Money Laundering Control
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this paper is to gain some insight into central bank digital currency research by reviewing the recent advances in central bank digital currency (CBDC) research in a way that would help researchers, policy makers and practitioners to take a closer look at CBDC.

          Design/methodology/approach

          The paper uses a systematic literature review methodology.

          Findings

          The review shows a general consensus that a CBDC is a liability of the central bank and it has cash-like attributes. The review also presents the motivation and benefits of issuing a CBDC such as the need to increase financial inclusion, the need to improve the conduct of monetary policy and to foster efficient digital payments. The review also shows that many central banks are researching the potential to issue CBDCs due to its many benefits. However, a number of studies have called for caution against over-optimism about the potential benefits of CBDC due to the limiting nature of CBDC design and its inability to meet multiple competing goals. Suggested areas for future research are identified such as the need to find the optimal CBDC design that meets all competing objectives, the need for empirical evidence on the effect of CBDC on the cost of credit and financial stability, and the need to find a balance between limiting the CBDC holdings of users and allowing users to hold as much CBDC as they want, and there is a need to undertake country-specific and regional case studies of CBDC design.

          Originality/value

          This review paper offers new areas for further research in central bank digital currencies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the Impact of Central Bank Digital Currency on Private Banks

              This paper investigates how a central bank digital currency can be expected to impact a monopolistic banking sector. The paper’s framework of analysis combines the Diamond (1965) model of government debt with the Klein (1971) and Monti (1972) model of a monopoly bank. The paper finds that the introduction of a central bank digital currency has no detrimental effect on bank lending activity and may, in some circumstances, even serve to promote it. Competitive pressure leads to a higher monopoly deposit rate which reduces profit but expands deposit funding through greater financial inclusion and desired saving. An appeal to available theory and evidence suggests that a properly designed central bank digital currency is not likely to threaten financial stability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Money Laundering Control
                JMLC
                Emerald
                1368-5201
                1368-5201
                January 07 2022
                March 02 2023
                January 07 2022
                March 02 2023
                : 26
                : 2
                : 215-226
                Article
                10.1108/JMLC-11-2021-0126
                8be3563e-bc4d-478c-ba07-0ef544b8bf48
                © 2023

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content312

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors88