6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      U.S. frontline workers and COVID-19 inequities

      research-article
      a , b , *
      Preventive Medicine
      Published by Elsevier Inc.
      Covid-19, Occupation, Frontline workers, Disparity

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We overcome a lack of frontline worker status information in most COVID-19 data repositories to document the extent to which occupation has contributed to COVID-19 disparities in the United States. Using national data from over a million U.S. respondents to a Facebook-Carnegie Mellon University survey administered from September 2020 to March 2021, we estimated the likelihoods of frontline workers, compared to non-frontline workers, 1) to ever test positive for SARs-Cov-2 and 2) to test positive for SARs-Cov-2 within the past two weeks. Net of other covariates including education level, county-level political environment, and rural residence, both healthcare and non-healthcare frontline workers had higher odds of having ever tested positive for SARs-Cov-2 across the study time period. Similarly, non-healthcare frontline workers were more likely to test positive in the previous 14 days. Conversely, healthcare frontline workers were less likely to have recently tested positive. Our findings suggest that occupational exposure has played an independent role in the uneven spread of the virus. In particular, non-healthcare frontline workers have experienced sustained higher risk of testing positive for SARs-Cov-2 compared to non-frontline workers. Alongside more worker protections, future COVID-19 and other highly infectious disease response strategies must be augmented by a more robust recognition of the role that structural factors, such as the highly stratified U.S. occupational landscape, have played in the uneven toll of the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Prev Med
          Prev Med
          Preventive Medicine
          Published by Elsevier Inc.
          0091-7435
          1096-0260
          6 October 2021
          6 October 2021
          : 106833
          Affiliations
          [a ]Public Health Policy & Administration, University of Wisconsin Zilber School of Public Health, USA
          [b ]Sociology and Faculty Affiliate of the Institute for Population Research, Ohio State University, USA
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author.
          Article
          S0091-7435(21)00402-3 106833
          10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106833
          8492358
          34624386
          8abeeb95-a56d-46c7-a8d0-3d4fcc4827ff
          © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          : 17 June 2021
          : 15 September 2021
          : 3 October 2021
          Categories
          Article

          Medicine
          covid-19,occupation,frontline workers,disparity
          Medicine
          covid-19, occupation, frontline workers, disparity

          Comments

          Comment on this article