4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and aortic valvular outflow jets: an experimental analysis using an MRI-compatible pulsatile flow circulation system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The characteristics of aortic valvular outflow jet affect aortopathy in the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). This study aimed to elucidate the effects of BAV morphology on the aortic valvular outflow jets. Morphotype-specific valve-devising apparatuses were developed to create aortic valve models. A magnetic resonance imaging-compatible pulsatile flow circulation system was developed to quantify the outflow jet. The eccentricity and circulation values of the peak systolic jet were compared among tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), three asymmetric BAVs, and two symmetric BAVs. The results showed mean aortic flow and leakage did not differ among the five BAVs (six samples, each). Asymmetric BAVs demonstrated the eccentric outflow jets directed to the aortic wall facing the smaller leaflets. In the asymmetric BAV with the smaller leaflet facing the right-anterior, left-posterior, and left-anterior quadrants of the aorta, the outflow jets exclusively impinged on the outer curvature of the ascending aorta, proximal arch, and the supra-valvular aortic wall, respectively. Symmetric BAVs demonstrated mildly eccentric outflow jets that did not impinge on the aortic wall. The circulation values at peak systole increased in asymmetric BAVs. The bicuspid symmetry and the position of smaller leaflet were determinant factors of the characteristics of aortic valvular outflow jet.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens.

            In general, classification of a disease has proven to be advantageous for disease management. This may also be valid for the bicuspid aortic valve, because the term "bicuspid aortic valve" stands for a common congenital aortic valve malformation with heterogeneous morphologic phenotypes and function resulting in different treatment strategies. We attempted to establish a classification system based on a 5-year data collection of surgical specimens. Between 1999 and 2003 a precise description of valve pathology was obtained from operative reports of 304 patients with a diseased bicuspid aortic valve. Several different characteristics of bicuspid aortic valves were tested to generate a pithy and easily applicable classification system. Three characteristics for a systematic classification were found appropriate: (1) number of raphes, (2) spatial position of cusps or raphes, and (3) functional status of the valve. The first characteristic was found to be the most significant and therefore termed "type." Three major types were identified: type 0 (no raphe), type 1 (one raphe), and type 2 (two raphes), followed by two supplementary characteristics, spatial position and function. These characteristics served to classify and codify the bicuspid aortic valves into three categories. Most frequently, a bicuspid aortic valve with one raphe was identified (type 1, n = 269). This raphe was positioned between the left (L) and right (R) coronary sinuses in 216 (type 1, L/R) with a hemodynamic predominant stenosis (S) in 119 (type 1, L/R, S). Only 21 patients had a "purely" bicuspid aortic valve with no raphe (type 0). A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve with one major category ("type") and two supplementary categories is presented. This classification, even if used in the major category (type) alone, might be advantageous to better define bicuspid aortic valve disease, facilitate scientific communication, and improve treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

              Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), the most common congenital heart defect, has been thought to cause frequent and severe aortic complications; however, long-term, population-based data are lacking. To determine the incidence of aortic complications in patients with BAV in a community cohort and in the general population. In this retrospective cohort study, we conducted comprehensive assessment of aortic complications of patients with BAV living in a population-based setting in Olmsted County, Minnesota. We analyzed long-term follow-up of a cohort of all Olmsted County residents diagnosed with definite BAV by echocardiography from 1980 to 1999 and searched for aortic complications of patients whose bicuspid valves had gone undiagnosed. The last year of follow-up was 2008-2009. Thoracic aortic dissection, ascending aortic aneurysm, and aortic surgery. The cohort included 416 consecutive patients with definite BAV diagnosed by echocardiography, mean (SD) follow-up of 16 (7) years (6530 patient-years). Aortic dissection occurred in 2 of 416 patients; incidence of 3.1 (95% CI, 0.5-9.5) cases per 10,000 patient-years, age-adjusted relative-risk 8.4 (95% CI, 2.1-33.5; P = .003) compared with the county's general population. Aortic dissection incidences for patients 50 years or older at baseline and bearers of aortic aneurysms at baseline were 17.4 (95% CI, 2.9-53.6) and 44.9 (95% CI, 7.5-138.5) cases per 10,000 patient-years, respectively. Comprehensive search for aortic dissections in undiagnosed bicuspid valves revealed 2 additional patients, allowing estimation of aortic dissection incidence in bicuspid valve patients irrespective of diagnosis status (1.5; 95% CI, 0.4-3.8 cases per 10,000 patient-years), which was similar to the diagnosed cohort. Of 384 patients without baseline aneurysms, 49 developed aneurysms at follow-up, incidence of 84.9 (95% CI, 63.3-110.9) cases per 10,000 patient-years and an age-adjusted relative risk 86.2 (95% CI, 65.1-114; P <.001 compared with the general population). The 25-year rate of aortic surgery was 25% (95% CI, 17.2%-32.8%). In the population of patients with BAV, the incidence of aortic dissection over a mean of 16 years of follow-up was low but significantly higher than in the general population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                iwasaki@waseda.jp
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                22 January 2021
                22 January 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 2066
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5290.e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9975, Cooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women’s Medical University and Waseda University, , Waseda University, ; Tokyo, 1628480 Japan
                [2 ]GRID grid.410818.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0720 6587, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, , Tokyo Women’s Medical University, ; Tokyo, 1628666 Japan
                [3 ]GRID grid.5290.e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9975, Department of Integrative Bioscience and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, , Waseda University, ; Tokyo, 1628480 Japan
                [4 ]GRID grid.5290.e, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9975, Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Creative Science and Engineering, , Waseda University, ; Tokyo, 1628480 Japan
                [5 ]GRID grid.410818.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0720 6587, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, , Tokyo Women’s Medical University, ; Tokyo, 1628666 Japan
                [6 ]GRID grid.488555.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1771 2637, Department of Radiological Service, , Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, ; Tokyo, 1628666 Japan
                Article
                81845
                10.1038/s41598-021-81845-w
                7822932
                33483580
                8a8a484f-df07-4164-a926-42eaa1c5cf0f
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 September 2020
                : 5 January 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research in Japan
                Award ID: 19K09277
                Funded by: Subsidy Program for the Development of International Standards for the Evaluation of Innovative Medical Devices and Regenerative Medicine Products, of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                cardiology,diseases,engineering
                Uncategorized
                cardiology, diseases, engineering

                Comments

                Comment on this article