6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate on Systolic Blood Pressure in CKD : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Visual Abstract

          Abstract

          Background

          Individuals with CKD are at a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Acidosis is positively correlated with CKD progression and elevated systolic BP. Sodium bicarbonate is an efficacious treatment of acidosis, although this may also increase systolic BP. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarize the evidence evaluating systolic BP and antihypertensive medication change (which may indicate systolic BP change) in response to sodium bicarbonate therapy in individuals with CKD.

          Methods

          Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization (WHO) trials registry databases were searched for randomized control trials where sodium bicarbonate was compared with placebo/usual care in CKD stage G1–5 non–dialysis-dependent populations. Random effects meta-analyses were used to evaluate changes in systolic BP and BP-modifying drugs after sodium bicarbonate intervention.

          Results

          Fourteen randomized control trials (2110 individuals, median follow-up 27 [interquartile range 97] weeks, mean age 60 [SD 10] years, mean systolic BP 136 [SD 17] mm Hg, mean eGFR 38 [SD 10] ml/min, mean serum bicarbonate 22 [SD 4] mmol/L) were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis suggested that sodium bicarbonate did not influence systolic BP in individuals with CKD stage G1–5. Results were consistent when stratifying by dose of sodium bicarbonate or duration of intervention. Similarly, there was no significant increase in the use of antihypertensive medication or diuretics in individuals taking sodium bicarbonate, whereas there was a greater decrease in antihypertensive medication use in individuals taking sodium bicarbonate compared with controls.

          Conclusions

          Our results suggest, with moderate certainty, that sodium bicarbonate supplementation does not adversely affect systolic BP in CKD or negatively influence antihypertensive medication requirements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

          Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.

            This article deals with inconsistency of relative (rather than absolute) treatment effects in binary/dichotomous outcomes. A body of evidence is not rated up in quality if studies yield consistent results, but may be rated down in quality if inconsistent. Criteria for evaluating consistency include similarity of point estimates, extent of overlap of confidence intervals, and statistical criteria including tests of heterogeneity and I(2). To explore heterogeneity, systematic review authors should generate and test a small number of a priori hypotheses related to patients, interventions, outcomes, and methodology. When inconsistency is large and unexplained, rating down quality for inconsistency is appropriate, particularly if some studies suggest substantial benefit, and others no effect or harm (rather than only large vs. small effects). Apparent subgroup effects may be spurious. Credibility is increased if subgroup effects are based on a small number of a priori hypotheses with a specified direction; subgroup comparisons come from within rather than between studies; tests of interaction generate low P-values; and have a biological rationale. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease.

              (2021)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
                Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
                CJASN
                CJASN
                Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
                American Society of Nephrology
                1555-9041
                1555-905X
                April 2023
                9 March 2023
                : 18
                : 4
                : 435-445
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Dr. Cristina Menni, Department of Twin Research, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom, or Dr. Sandosh Padmanabhan, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, United Kingdom. Email: cristina.menni@ 123456kcl.ac.uk or sandosh.padmanabhan@ 123456glasgow.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-3571
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-0571
                Article
                CJASN-2023-000179 00007
                10.2215/CJN.0000000000000119
                10103210
                36758154
                8a3d6444-8266-4e14-b5d3-3d1937064f22
                Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Nephrology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 October 2022
                : 24 January 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 37, Pages: 0
                Categories
                Original Article
                Chronic Kidney Disease

                chronic metabolic acidosis,sodium bicarbonate,systolic blood pressure

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content347

                Cited by7

                Most referenced authors742