34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Relevance of Personal Characteristics in Allocating Health Care Resources—Controversial Preferences of Laypersons with Different Educational Backgrounds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In all industrial countries publicly funded health care systems are confronted with budget constraints. Therefore, priority setting in resource allocation seems inevitable. This paper examines whether personal characteristics could be taken into consideration when allocating health services in Germany, and whether attitudes towards prioritizing health care vary among individuals with different levels of education. Using a conjoint analysis approach, hypothetical patients described in terms of ‘lifestyle’, ‘age’, ‘severity of illness’, ‘type of illness’, ‘improvement in health’, and ‘treatment costs’ were constructed, and the importance weights for these personal characteristics were elicited from 120 members of the general public. Participants were selected according to a sampling guide including educational background, age, chronic illness and gender. Results are reported for groups with different levels of education (low, middle, high) only. The findings show that the patients’ age is the most important criterion for the allocation of health care resources, followed by ‘severity of illness’ and ‘improvement in health’. Preferences vary among participants with different educational backgrounds, which refer to different attitudes towards distributive justice and might represent different socialization experiences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social Class Differentials in Health and Mortality: Patterns and Explanations in Comparative Perspective

          Irma Elo (2009)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

              Much of the literature on distributive preferences covers specific considerations in isolation, and recent reviews have suggested that research is required to inform on the relative importance of various key considerations. Responding to this research recommendation, we explore the distributive preferences of the general public using a set of generic social value judgments. We report on a discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey, using face-to-face interviews, in a sample of the general population (n=259). The context for the survey was resource allocation decisions in the UK National Health Service, using the process of health technology appraisal as an example. The attributes used covered health improvement, value for money, severity of health, and availability of other treatments, and it is the first such survey to use cost-effectiveness in scenarios described to the general public. Results support the feasibility and acceptability of the DCE approach for the elicitation of public preferences. Choice data are used to consider the relative importance of changes across attribute levels, and to model utility scores and relative probabilities for the full set of combinations of attributes and levels in the experimental design used (n=64). Results allow the relative social value of health technology scenarios to be explored. Findings add to a sparse literature on 'social' preferences, and show that DCE data can be used to consider the strength of preference over alternative scenarios in a priority-setting context.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                16 January 2012
                January 2012
                : 9
                : 1
                : 223-243
                Affiliations
                School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany; Email: a.diederich@ 123456jacobs-university.de
                Author notes
                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Email: j.winkelhage@ 123456jacobs-university.de ; Tel.: +49-421-200-3435; Fax: +49-421-200-3303.
                Article
                ijerph-09-00223
                10.3390/ijerph9010223
                3315072
                22470289
                8a1ba91e-6b81-45ac-bdb3-b0dc52674376
                © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 03 August 2011
                : 12 December 2011
                : 11 January 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                conjoint analysis,socialization theory,germany,distributive preferences,public attitudes,distributive justice,prioritizing,health behavior

                Comments

                Comment on this article