Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review

Khalil, Hanan; Ameen, Daniel; Zarnegar, Armita

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.005

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review

Author(s): Hanan Khalil , Daniel Ameen , Armita Zarnegar

Publication date Created: April 2022

Publication date (Print): April 2022

Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Most cited references 43

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea Tricco … (2020)

The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR).

0 comments Cited 997 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

Micah D.J. Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea Tricco … (2021)

0 comments Cited 188 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

How to complete a full systematic review in 2 weeks: processes, facilitators and barriers.

Justin Clark, Paul Glasziou, Chris Del Mar … (2020)

Systematic reviews (SRs) are time and resource intensive, requiring approximately 1 year from protocol registration to submission for publication. Our aim was to describe the process, facilitators, and barriers to completing the first 2-week full SR.