23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of chemical in vitro activation versus fragmentation on human ovarian tissue and follicle growth in culture

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          STUDY QUESTION

          What is the effect of the chemical in vitro activation (cIVA) protocol compared with fragmentation only (Frag, also known as mechanical IVA) on gene expression, follicle activation and growth in human ovarian tissue in vitro?

          SUMMARY ANSWER

          Although histological assessment shows that cIVA significantly increases follicle survival and growth compared to Frag, both protocols stimulate extensive and nearly identical transcriptomic changes in cultured tissue compared to freshly collected ovarian tissue, including marked changes in energy metabolism and inflammatory responses.

          WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

          Treatments based on cIVA of the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway in ovarian tissue followed by auto-transplantation have been administered to patients with refractory premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and resulted in live births. However, comparable effects with mere tissue fragmentation have been shown, questioning the added value of chemical stimulation that could potentially activate oncogenic responses.

          STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

          Fifty-nine ovarian cortical biopsies were obtained from consenting women undergoing elective caesarean section (C-section). The samples were fragmented for culture studies. Half of the fragments were exposed to bpV (HOpic)+740Y-P (Frag+cIVA group) during the first 24 h of culture, while the other half were cultured with medium only (Frag group). Subsequently, both groups were cultured with medium only for an additional 6 days. Tissue and media samples were collected for histological, transcriptomic, steroid hormone, and cytokine/chemokine analyses at various time points.

          PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

          Effects on follicles were evaluated by counting and scoring serial sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin before and after the 7-day culture. Follicle function was assessed by quantification of steroids by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry at different time points. Cytokines and chemokines were measured by multiplex assay. Transcriptomic effects were measured by RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of the tissue after the initial 24-h culture. Selected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were validated by quantitative PCR and immunofluorescence in cultured ovarian tissue as well as in KGN cell (human ovarian granulosa-like tumor cell line) culture experiments.

          MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

          Compared to the Frag group, the Frag+cIVA group exhibited a significantly higher follicle survival rate, increased numbers of secondary follicles, and larger follicle sizes. Additionally, the tissue in the Frag+cIVA group produced less dehydroepiandrosterone compared to Frag. Cytokine measurement showed a strong inflammatory response at the start of the culture in both groups. The RNA-seq data revealed modest differences between the Frag+cIVA and Frag groups, with only 164 DEGs identified using a relaxed cut-off of false discovery rate (FDR) <0.1. Apart from the expected PI3K–protein kinase B (Akt) pathway, cIVA also regulated pathways related to hypoxia, cytokines, and inflammation. In comparison to freshly collected ovarian tissue, gene expression in general was markedly affected in both the Frag+cIVA and Frag groups, with a total of 3119 and 2900 DEGs identified (FDR < 0.001), respectively. The top enriched gene sets in both groups included several pathways known to modulate follicle growth such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)C1 signaling. Significant changes compared to fresh tissue were also observed in the expression of genes encoding for steroidogenesis enzymes and classical granulosa cell markers in both groups. Intriguingly, we discovered a profound upregulation of genes related to glycolysis and its upstream regulator in both Frag and Frag+cIVA groups, and these changes were further boosted by the cIVA treatment. Cell culture experiments confirmed glycolysis-related genes as direct targets of the cIVA drugs. In conclusion, cIVA enhances follicle growth, as expected, but the mechanisms may be more complex than PI3K–Akt–mTOR alone, and the impact on function and quality of the follicles after the culture period remains an open question.

          LARGE SCALE DATA

          Data were deposited in the GEO data base, accession number GSE234765. The code for sequencing analysis can be found in https://github.com/tialiv/IVA_project.

          LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

          Similar to the published IVA protocols, the first steps in our study were performed in an in vitro culture model where the ovarian tissue was isolated from the regulation of hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis. Further in vivo experiments will be needed, for example in xeno-transplantation models, to explore the long-term impacts of the discovered effects. The tissue collected from patients undergoing C-section may not be comparable to tissue of patients with POI.

          WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

          The general impact of fragmentation and short (24 h) in vitro culture on gene expression in ovarian tissue far exceeded the effects of cIVA. Yet, follicle growth was stimulated by cIVA, which may suggest effects on specific cell populations that may be diluted in bulk RNA-seq. Nevertheless, we confirmed the impact of cIVA on glycolysis using a cell culture model, suggesting impacts on cellular signaling beyond the PI3K pathway. The profound changes in inflammation and glycolysis following fragmentation and culture could contribute to follicle activation and loss in ovarian tissue culture, as well as in clinical applications, such as fertility preservation by ovarian tissue auto-transplantation.

          STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

          This study was funded by research grants from European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Project ERIN No. 952516, FREIA No. 825100), Swedish Research Council VR (2020-02132), StratRegen funding from Karolinska Institutet, KI-China Scholarship Council (CSC) Programme and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2022JJ40782). International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory Research was funded by the European Union’s H2020 Project Sinfonia (857253) and SbDToolBox (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000047), supported by Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund. No competing interests are declared.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

          The two most commonly used methods to analyze data from real-time, quantitative PCR experiments are absolute quantification and relative quantification. Absolute quantification determines the input copy number, usually by relating the PCR signal to a standard curve. Relative quantification relates the PCR signal of the target transcript in a treatment group to that of another sample such as an untreated control. The 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method is a convenient way to analyze the relative changes in gene expression from real-time quantitative PCR experiments. The purpose of this report is to present the derivation, assumptions, and applications of the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. In addition, we present the derivation and applications of two variations of the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method that may be useful in the analysis of real-time, quantitative PCR data. Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters.

            Increasing quantitative data generated from transcriptomics and proteomics require integrative strategies for analysis. Here, we present an R package, clusterProfiler that automates the process of biological-term classification and the enrichment analysis of gene clusters. The analysis module and visualization module were combined into a reusable workflow. Currently, clusterProfiler supports three species, including humans, mice, and yeast. Methods provided in this package can be easily extended to other species and ontologies. The clusterProfiler package is released under Artistic-2.0 License within Bioconductor project. The source code and vignette are freely available at http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/clusterProfiler.html.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0.

              Well-annotated gene sets representing the universe of the biological processes are critical for meaningful and insightful interpretation of large-scale genomic data. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) is one of the most widely used repositories of such sets. We report the availability of a new version of the database, MSigDB 3.0, with over 6700 gene sets, a complete revision of the collection of canonical pathways and experimental signatures from publications, enhanced annotations and upgrades to the web site. MSigDB is freely available for non-commercial use at http://www.broadinstitute.org/msigdb.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Hum Reprod Open
                Hum Reprod Open
                hropen
                Human Reproduction Open
                Oxford University Press
                2399-3529
                2024
                22 May 2024
                22 May 2024
                : 2024
                : 3
                : hoae028
                Affiliations
                Department of Reproductive Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University , Changsha, P.R. China
                Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Department of Environment and Health, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Nanosafety Group, International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory , Braga, Portugal
                Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu , Tartu, Estonia
                Competence Centre on Health Technologies , Tartu, Estonia
                Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis Core Facility, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Nanosafety Group, International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory , Braga, Portugal
                Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine Research Program, Uppsala University , Uppsala, Sweden
                Department of Environment and Health, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden
                Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, K65 Karolinska University Hospital, SE-14186 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: jie.hao.2@ 123456ki.se

                Jie Hao and Tianyi Li authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4839-665X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2246-4896
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-1015
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-0855
                Article
                hoae028
                10.1093/hropen/hoae028
                11128059
                38803550
                87175264-ba88-402e-a806-6afcefd22c9b
                © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 28 November 2023
                : 15 April 2024
                : 1 May 2024
                : 25 May 2024
                Page count
                Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme;
                Award ID: 952516
                Award ID: 825100
                Categories
                Original Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00905

                fertility preservation,primary ovarian insufficiency,follicle development,gene expression,ovary

                Comments

                Comment on this article