30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Variants of the SLC6A3 (DAT1) polymorphism affect performance monitoring-related cortical evoked potentials that are associated with ADHD

      , , , , , ,
      Biological Psychology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although the 10-repeat (10R) variant of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1 or SLC6A3) is suggested to be a risk allele for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) no relationships between DAT1 and measures of cognition in children with ADHD have yet been demonstrated. We studied neurophysiological correlates of performance monitoring during a feedback-based learning task by measuring cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) in a group of 65 10-13-year-old children half of whom were diagnosed as ADHD. The first part of the study investigates correlations between parent-reported behaviour problems and several performance monitoring components, while the second part investigates the relationship between DAT1 and these components. Specifically ADHD problems correlated significantly with an error-related positivity (Pe) and a feedback-anticipatory negativity (the SPN). Only these two components discriminated between the DAT1 10/10R and 9R carriers. The 10/10R carriers showed a smaller Pe to errors and a smaller SPN in anticipation of negative feedback, particularly with learning. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Biological Psychology
          Biological Psychology
          Elsevier BV
          03010511
          September 2010
          September 2010
          : 85
          : 1
          : 19-32
          Article
          10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.04.007
          20450954
          87171f99-1e08-418a-a24b-e4e23af72227
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article