7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An impairment-specific hip exoskeleton assistance for gait training in subjects with acquired brain injury: a feasibility study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study was designed to investigate the feasibility and the potential effects on walking performance of a short gait training with a novel impairment-specific hip assistance (iHA) through a bilateral active pelvis orthosis (APO) in patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Fourteen subjects capable of independent gait and exhibiting mild-to-moderate gait deficits, due to an ABI, were enrolled. Subjects presenting deficit in hip flexion and/or extension were included and divided into two groups based on the presence (group A , n =  6) or absence (group B, n =  8) of knee hyperextension during stance phase of walking. Two iHA-based profiles were developed for the groups. The protocol included two overground gait training sessions using APO, and two evaluation sessions, pre and post training. Primary outcomes were pre vs. post-training walking distance and steady-state speed in the 6-min walking test. Secondary outcomes were self-selected speed, joint kinematics and kinetics, gait symmetry and forward propulsion, assessed through 3D gait analysis. Following the training, study participants significantly increased the walked distance and average steady-state speed in the 6-min walking tests, both when walking with and without the APO. The increased walked distance surpassed the minimal clinically important difference for groups A and B, (respectively, 42 and 57 m > 34 m). In group A, five out of six subjects had decreased knee hyperextension at the post-training session (on average the peak of the knee extension angle was reduced by 36%). Knee flexion during swing phase increased, by 16% and 31%, for A and B groups respectively. Two-day gait training with APO providing iHA was effective and safe in improving walking performance and knee kinematics in ABI survivors. These preliminary findings suggest that this strategy may be viable for subject-specific post-ABI gait rehabilitation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update

          Circulation
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

            The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults.

              To estimate the magnitude of small meaningful and substantial individual change in physical performance measures and evaluate their responsiveness. Secondary data analyses using distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine meaningful change. Secondary analysis of data from an observational study and clinical trials of community-dwelling older people and subacute stroke survivors. Older adults with mobility disabilities in a strength training trial (n=100), subacute stroke survivors in an intervention trial (n=100), and a prospective cohort of community-dwelling older people (n=492). Gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD), and self-reported mobility. Most small meaningful change estimates ranged from 0.04 to 0.06 m/s for gait speed, 0.27 to 0.55 points for SPPB, and 19 to 22 m for 6MWD. Most substantial change estimates ranged from 0.08 to 0.14 m/s for gait speed, 0.99 to 1.34 points for SPPB, and 47 to 49 m for 6MWD. Based on responsiveness indices, per-group sample sizes for clinical trials ranged from 13 to 42 for substantial change and 71 to 161 for small meaningful change. Best initial estimates of small meaningful change are near 0.05 m/s for gait speed, 0.5 points for SPPB, and 20 m for 6MWD and of substantial change are near 0.10 m/s for gait speed, 1.0 point for SPPB, and 50 m for 6MWD. For clinical use, substantial change in these measures and small change in gait speed and 6MWD, but not SPPB, are detectable. For research use, these measures yield feasible sample sizes for detecting meaningful change.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                chiara.livolsi@santannapisa.it
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                11 November 2022
                11 November 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 19343
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.263145.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 600X, The BioRobotics Institute, , Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, ; Pontedera, Pisa, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.263145.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 600X, Department of Excellence in Robotics & AI, , Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, ; Pisa, Italy
                [3 ]IUVO S.R.L., Pontedera, Pisa, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.417206.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 9346, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, , Valduce Hospital, ; Costa Masnaga, Lecco, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.426244.2, ISNI 0000 0004 0625 2831, Össur, ; Reykjavík, Iceland
                [6 ]GRID grid.419979.b, ISNI 0000 0004 0453 5483, Department of PM&R, , MossRehab and Einstein Healthcare Network, ; Elkins Park, PA USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.418563.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1090 9021, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, ; Florence, Italy
                Article
                23283
                10.1038/s41598-022-23283-w
                9652374
                36369462
                86e2a75c-b433-46ca-adc8-3f7c40c254f3
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 April 2022
                : 27 October 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                biomedical engineering,movement disorders
                Uncategorized
                biomedical engineering, movement disorders

                Comments

                Comment on this article