0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validity and reliability of the brief form of the normative male alexithymia scale among Chinese patients after radical prostatectomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Alexithymia, a cognitive and emotional deficit characterized by difficulty in expressing emotions and identifying feelings, poses significant challenges in healthcare settings. Developing a reliable and valid tool to measure alexithymia in post-prostatectomy patients would not only aid healthcare professionals in identifying at-risk individuals but also facilitate early intervention and targeted support. This study aimed to translate the Brief Form of the Normative Male Alexithymia Scale (NMAS-BF) into Simplified Chinese, evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version, and explore its influencing factors. The English version of the NMAS-BF was translated into Chinese according to Brislin’s translation guidelines. A survey was administered to 430 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy across four tertiary-grade A hospitals in China. To assess test-retest reliability, 30 patients completed the survey twice. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 22.0. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the content validity, construct validity, reliability, and concurrent validity of the translated NMAS-BF. Additionally, Pearson’s correlation, t-tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to identify factors influencing the NMAS-BF. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the NMAS-BF was 0.856. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total scale was 0.938, indicating good stability. Content validity was satisfactory, with exploratory factor analysis revealing a single-factor model that accounted for 58.965% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (χ²/df = 1.371, RMSEA = 0.041) demonstrated acceptable construct validity. Statistically significant differences in alexithymia levels were observed across patients with varying educational levels, family residence, household monthly income, and number of children. Perceived stress, mutuality, social impact, and self-esteem were identified as significant factors influencing alexithymia. This study initially translated the Brief Form of the Normative Male Alexithymia Scale (NMAS-BF) into Chinese and demonstrated its psychometric validity for assessing alexithymia in patients post-radical prostatectomy. By identifying alexithymic patterns and their contributing factors, the research aims to improve emotional expression and enhance the mental well-being of Chinese patients undergoing this procedure. Furthermore, the factors identified in the Chinese version of the NMAS-BF may provide valuable theoretical insights for future intervention studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.

            Reporting practices in 194 confirmatory factor analysis studies (1,409 factor models) published in American Psychological Association journals from 1998 to 2006 were reviewed and compared with established reporting guidelines. Three research questions were addressed: (a) how do actual reporting practices compare with published guidelines? (b) how do researchers report model fit in light of divergent perspectives on the use of ancillary fit indices (e.g., L.-T. Hu & P. M. Bentler, 1999; H. W. Marsh, K.-T., Hau, & Z. Wen, 2004)? and (c) are fit measures that support hypothesized models reported more often than fit measures that are less favorable? Results indicate some positive findings with respect to reporting practices including proposing multiple models a priori and near universal reporting of the chi-square significance test. However, many deficiencies were found such as lack of information regarding missing data and assessment of normality. Additionally, the authors found increases in reported values of some incremental fit statistics and no statistically significant evidence that researchers selectively report measures of fit that support their preferred model. Recommendations for reporting are summarized and a checklist is provided to help editors, reviewers, and authors improve reporting practices.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates

              Previous studies have reported significant variation in prostate cancer rates and trends mainly due to differences in detection practices, availability of treatment, and underlying genetic susceptibility.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zxs9818@126.com
                1058924853@zzu.edu.cn
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                3 January 2025
                3 January 2025
                2025
                : 15
                : 719
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of urinary surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, ( https://ror.org/04ypx8c21) Zhengzhou, 450003 Henan China
                [2 ]Department of andrology and energy medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital , Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, ( https://ror.org/04ypx8c21) Zhengzhou, 450003 Henan China
                Article
                82958
                10.1038/s41598-024-82958-8
                11698824
                39753612
                81c22d42-cb42-4579-aaad-6f7f4ad116f0
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 6 September 2024
                : 10 December 2024
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2025

                Uncategorized
                alexithymia,prostate cancer,validity,reliability,psychological assessment,men’s mental health,health care,oncology,urology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content902

                Most referenced authors392