0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The continuum of care as a unifying framework for intergenerational and interspecies health equity

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Unlocking the full potential of different people and organizations to address existential health threats requires shared goals and frameworks that allow people to see themselves contributing to a common and shared continuum of care. A new narrative to help people implement collective action for collective problems is needed.

          Methods

          This paper is draw from the co-authors experience working from the local to international level on planetary health problems.

          Results

          The proposed conceptual framework expands the socioecological model of health to help formulate multilevel approaches that foster healthier circumstances for all by revealing the mutual benefits that emerge from pooling expertise, funding, and political will to solve multiple problems with coordinated investment of resources and effort. It is intended to support program planning and communication. This framework is a response to the absence of systematic attempts to concurrently counteract the social and environmental conditions leading to disease, dysfunction and deficits which is increasingly seen as being problematic, especially as the root causes of health problems and solutions converge across species, sectors, and generations. The framework is embedded in the idea of interspecies and intergenerational health equity.

          Discussion

          Ensuring interspecies and intergenerational health equity requires each actor to fulfill their roles along the continuum while supporting the needs of others. A socio-ecological continuum of care provides bundled options that combine knowledge from different sectors, disciplines and perspectives to guide interventions over time across a comprehensive array of services and support spanning all levels of needs, species and generations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Breadth of the Socio-Ecological Model.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Overcoming challenges for designing and implementing the One Health approach: A systematic review of the literature

              Collaborative approaches in health, such as One Health (OH), are promising; nevertheless, several authors point at persistent challenges for designing and implementing OH initiatives. Among other challenges, OH practitioners struggle in their efforts to collaborate across disciplines and domains. This paper aims to provide insights into the existing challenges for designing and implementing OH initiatives, their causes and solutions, and points out strategic solutions with the potential to solve practical challenges. A systematic literature search was performed for emerging challenges and proposed solutions in the process of conducting OH initiatives. Next, a thematic and a causal analysis were performed to unravel challenges and their causes. Finally, solutions were discriminated on whether they were only recommended, or implemented as a proof-of-principle. The 56 included papers describe 21 challenges endured by OH initiatives that relate to different themes (policy and funding; education and training; surveillance; multi-actor, multi-domain, and multi-level collaborations; and evidence). These challenges occur in three different phases: the acquisition of sufficient conditions to start an initiative, its execution, and its monitoring and evaluation. The findings indicate that individual challenges share overlapping causes and crosscutting causal relations. Accordingly, solutions for the successful performance of OH initiatives should be implemented to tackle simultaneously different types of challenges occurring in different phases. Still, promoting collaboration between the wide diversity of stakeholders, as a fundamental aspect in the OH approach, is still by far the most challenging factor in performing OH initiatives. Causes for that are the difficulties in promoting meaningful and equal participation from diverse actors. Solutions proposed for this challenge focused on guiding stakeholders to think and collaborate beyond their professional and cultural silos to generate knowledge co-creation and innovative methodologies and frameworks. Finally, the biggest knowledge gap identified, in terms of proposed solutions, was for monitoring and evaluating OH initiatives. This highlights the need for future research on evaluation methods and tools specific for the OH approach, to provide credible evidence on its added value. When considering challenges endured by former OH initiatives and the proposed solutions for these challenges, practitioners should be able to plan and structure such initiatives in a more successful way, through the strategic pre-consideration of solutions or simply by avoiding known barriers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                04 October 2023
                2023
                : 11
                : 1236569
                Affiliations
                [1] 1McEachran Institute , Nanoose Bay, BC, Canada
                [2] 2Wildlife Conservation Society , New York, NY, United States
                [3] 3Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine , Vienna, Austria
                Author notes

                Edited by: Zeyuan Qiu, New Jersey Institute of Technology, United States

                Reviewed by: Yanlin Niu, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control (Beijing CDC), China

                *Correspondence: Craig Stephen, craigstephen.pes@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2023.1236569
                10582321
                37860805
                80cf822f-9f7d-4e26-8b69-fc24ac999f9d
                Copyright © 2023 Stephen and Walzer.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 June 2023
                : 19 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 6, Words: 4066
                Categories
                Public Health
                Perspective
                Custom metadata
                Planetary Health

                socio-ecologic,health,equity,interspecies,intergenerational,planetary,one health

                Comments

                Comment on this article