6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy of a topical concentrated surfactant gel on microbial communities in non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers with chronic biofilm infections: A proof‐of‐concept study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This proof‐of‐concept study sought to determine the effects of standard of care (SOC) and a topically applied concentrated surfactant gel (SG) on the total microbial load, community composition, and community diversity in non‐healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) with chronic biofilm infections. SOC was provided in addition to a topical concentrated SG, applied every 2 days for 6 weeks. Wound swabs were obtained from the base of ulcers at baseline (week 0), week 1, mid‐point (week 3), and end of treatment (week 6). DNA sequencing and real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were employed to determine the total microbial load, community composition, and diversity of patient samples. Tissue specimens were obtained at baseline and scanning electron microscopy and peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridisation with confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to confirm the presence of biofilm in all 10 DFUs with suspected chronic biofilm infections. The application of SG resulted in 7 of 10 samples achieving a reduction in mean log10 total microbial load from baseline to end of treatment (0.8 Log10 16S copies, ±0.6), and 3 of 10 samples demonstrated an increase in mean Log10 total microbial load (0.6 log10 16S copies, ±0.8) from baseline to end of treatment. Composition changes in microbial communities were driven by changes to the most dominant bacteria. Corynebacterium sp. and Streptococcus sp. frequently reduced in relative abundance in patient samples from week 0 to week 6 but did not disappear. In contrast, Staphylococcus sp., Finegoldia sp., and Fusobacterium sp., relative abundances frequently increased in patient samples from week 0 to week 6. The application of a concentrated SG resulted in varying shifts to diversity (increase or decrease) between week 0 and week 6 samples at the individual patient level. Any shifts in community diversity were independent to changes in the total microbial loads. SOC and a topical concentrated SG directly affect the microbial loads and community composition of DFUs with chronic biofilm infections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle.

          Most natural environments harbour a stunningly diverse collection of microbial species. In these communities, bacteria compete with their neighbours for space and resources. Laboratory experiments with pure and mixed cultures have revealed many active mechanisms by which bacteria can impair or kill other microorganisms. In addition, a growing body of theoretical and experimental population studies indicates that the interactions within and between bacterial species can have a profound impact on the outcome of competition in nature. The next challenge is to integrate the findings of these laboratory and theoretical studies and to evaluate the predictions that they generate in more natural settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI).

            Critical limb ischemia, first defined in 1982, was intended to delineate a subgroup of patients with a threatened lower extremity primarily because of chronic ischemia. It was the intent of the original authors that patients with diabetes be excluded or analyzed separately. The Fontaine and Rutherford Systems have been used to classify risk of amputation and likelihood of benefit from revascularization by subcategorizing patients into two groups: ischemic rest pain and tissue loss. Due to demographic shifts over the last 40 years, especially a dramatic rise in the incidence of diabetes mellitus and rapidly expanding techniques of revascularization, it has become increasingly difficult to perform meaningful outcomes analysis for patients with threatened limbs using these existing classification systems. Particularly in patients with diabetes, limb threat is part of a broad disease spectrum. Perfusion is only one determinant of outcome; wound extent and the presence and severity of infection also greatly impact the threat to a limb. Therefore, the Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Guidelines Committee undertook the task of creating a new classification of the threatened lower extremity that reflects these important considerations. We term this new framework, the Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System. Risk stratification is based on three major factors that impact amputation risk and clinical management: Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI). The implementation of this classification system is intended to permit more meaningful analysis of outcomes for various forms of therapy in this challenging, but heterogeneous population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).

              The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes and updates the 2015 IWGDF infection guideline. On the basis of patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes (PICOs) developed by the infection committee, in conjunction with internal and external reviewers and consultants, and on systematic reviews the committee conducted on the diagnosis of infection (new) and treatment of infection (updated from 2015), we offer 27 recommendations. These cover various aspects of diagnosing soft tissue and bone infection, including the classification scheme for diagnosing infection and its severity. Of note, we have updated this scheme for the first time since we developed it 15 years ago. We also review the microbiology of diabetic foot infections, including how to collect samples and to process them to identify causative pathogens. Finally, we discuss the approach to treating diabetic foot infections, including selecting appropriate empiric and definitive antimicrobial therapy for soft tissue and for bone infections, when and how to approach surgical treatment, and which adjunctive treatments we think are or are not useful for the infectious aspects of diabetic foot problems. For this version of the guideline, we also updated four tables and one figure from the 2016 guideline. We think that following the principles of diagnosing and treating diabetic foot infections outlined in this guideline can help clinicians to provide better care for these patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                matthew.malone@westernsydney.edu.au
                Journal
                Int Wound J
                Int Wound J
                10.1111/(ISSN)1742-481X
                IWJ
                International Wound Journal
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1742-4801
                1742-481X
                21 January 2021
                August 2021
                : 18
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/iwj.v18.4 )
                : 457-466
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] South West Sydney Limb Preservation and Wound Research South West Sydney Local Health District Sydney Australia
                [ 2 ] High Risk Foot Service, Liverpool Hospital South West Sydney LHD Sydney Australia
                [ 3 ] Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Medicine Western Sydney University Sydney Australia
                [ 4 ] Antimicrobial Resistance and Mobile Elements Group Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research Sydney Australia
                [ 5 ] Department of Plastic Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Matthew Malone, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, 1 Campbell Street Liverpool NSW 2170.

                Email: matthew.malone@ 123456westernsydney.edu.au

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-8031
                Article
                IWJ13546
                10.1111/iwj.13546
                8273583
                33476485
                802b8587-e5b9-46ef-9e6a-95c0a64c09c7
                © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 18 December 2020
                : 03 November 2020
                : 28 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Pages: 10, Words: 5325
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.4 mode:remove_FC converted:12.07.2021

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                diabetic foot ulcer,biofilm,poloxomer‐188,concentrated surfactant gel

                Comments

                Comment on this article