33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A comprehensive review on infant formula: nutritional and functional constituents, recent trends in processing and its impact on infants’ gut microbiota

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Human milk is considered the most valuable form of nutrition for infants for their growth, development and function. So far, there are still some cases where feeding human milk is not feasible. As a result, the market for infant formula is widely increasing, and formula feeding become an alternative or substitute for breastfeeding. The nutritional value of the formula can be improved by adding functional bioactive compounds like probiotics, prebiotics, human milk oligosaccharides, vitamins, minerals, taurine, inositol, osteopontin, lactoferrin, gangliosides, carnitine etc. For processing of infant formula, diverse thermal and non-thermal technologies have been employed. Infant formula can be either in powdered form, which requires reconstitution with water or in ready-to-feed liquid form, among which powder form is readily available, shelf-stable and vastly marketed. Infants’ gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem and the nutrient composition of infant formula is recognized to have a lasting effect on it. Likewise, the gut microbiota establishment closely parallels with host immune development and growth. Therefore, it must be contemplated as an important factor for consideration while developing formulas. In this review, we have focused on the formulation and manufacturing of safe and nutritious infant formula equivalent to human milk or aligning with the infant’s needs and its ultimate impact on infants’ gut microbiota.

          Related collections

          Most cited references369

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?

            Despite its established benefits, breastfeeding is no longer a norm in many communities. Multifactorial determinants of breastfeeding need supportive measures at many levels, from legal and policy directives to social attitudes and values, women's work and employment conditions, and health-care services to enable women to breastfeed. When relevant interventions are delivered adequately, breastfeeding practices are responsive and can improve rapidly. The best outcomes are achieved when interventions are implemented concurrently through several channels. The marketing of breastmilk substitutes negatively affects breastfeeding: global sales in 2014 of US$44·8 billion show the industry's large, competitive claim on infant feeding. Not breastfeeding is associated with lower intelligence and economic losses of about $302 billion annually or 0·49% of world gross national income. Breastfeeding provides short-term and long-term health and economic and environmental advantages to children, women, and society. To realise these gains, political support and financial investment are needed to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome

              Summary The intestinal tract is inhabited by a large diverse community of microbes collectively referred to as gut microbiota. While gut microbiota provide important benefits to its host, especially in metabolism and immune development, disturbance of the microbiota-host relationship is associated with numerous chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the group of obesity-associated diseases collectively referred to as metabolic syndrome. A primary means by which the intestine is protected from its microbiota is via multilayered mucus structures that cover the intestinal surface thus allowing the vast majority of gut bacteria to be kept at a safe distance from epithelial cells that line the intestine 1 . Thus, agents that disrupt mucus-bacterial interactions might have the potential to promote diseases associated with gut inflammation. Consequently, it has been hypothesized that emulsifiers, detergent-like molecules that are a ubiquitous component of processed foods and that can increase bacterial translocation across epithelia in vitro 2 , might be promoting the post-mid 20th century increase in IBD 3 . Herein, we observed that, in mice, relatively low concentrations of two commonly used emulsifiers, namely carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80, induced low-grade inflammation and obesity/metabolic syndrome in WT hosts and promoted robust colitis in mice predisposed to this disorder. Emulsifier-induced metabolic syndrome was associated with microbiota encroachment, altered species composition, and increased pro-inflammatory potential. Use of germ-free mice and fecal transplants indicated that such changes in microbiota were necessary and sufficient for both low-grade inflammation and metabolic syndrome. These results support the emerging concept that perturbed host-microbiota interactions resulting in low-grade inflammation can promote adiposity and its associated metabolic effects. Moreover, they suggest that broad use of emulsifying agents might be contributing to increased societal incidence of obesity/metabolic syndrome and other chronic inflammatory diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Nutr
                Front Nutr
                Front. Nutr.
                Frontiers in Nutrition
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-861X
                21 June 2023
                2023
                : 10
                : 1194679
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University , Varanasi, India
                [2] 2Department of Livestock Production Management, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University , Jobner, India
                [3] 3Department of Agriculture Economics, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University , Jobner, India
                [4] 4Division of Dairy Technology, ICAR—National Dairy Research Institute , Karnal, India
                [5] 5Department of Food Technology and Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Ibb University , Ibb, Yemen
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ana Maria Calderon De La Barca, National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT), Mexico

                Reviewed by: Abraham Wall-Medrano, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico; Lina Zhang, Jiangnan University, China

                *Correspondence: Vinod Kumar Paswan, vkpaswan.dsft@ 123456bhu.ac.in
                Article
                10.3389/fnut.2023.1194679
                10320619
                37415910
                7f95e578-7b5f-45ce-aefc-fb804026cffe
                Copyright © 2023 Bakshi, Paswan, Yadav, Bhinchhar, Kharkwal, Rose, Kanetkar, Kumar, Al-Zamani and Bunkar.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 March 2023
                : 30 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 378, Pages: 27, Words: 27826
                Categories
                Nutrition
                Review
                Custom metadata
                Nutrition and Microbes

                breastfeeding,milk formulas,infant gut microbiome,non-thermal processing techniques,thermal processing,pediatric nutrition,infant diet formulation,human milk

                Comments

                Comment on this article