For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
36
views
0
references
 Top references
cited by
159
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      2,716
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Quality improvement collaboratives (QIC) have proliferated internationally, but there is little empirical evidence for their effectiveness.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Title: BMJ Quality & Safety
          Abbreviated Title: BMJ Qual Saf
          Publisher: BMJ
          ISSN (Print): 2044-5415
          ISSN (Electronic): 2044-5423
          Publication date Created: February 19 2018
          Publication date (Print): March 21 2018
          Volume: 27
          Issue: 3
          Pages: 226-240
          Article
          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926
          PubMed ID: 29055899
          SO-VID: 7dfd19e3-0f22-481a-8348-84d1f83b451a
          Copyright © © 2018
          History

          Data availability:

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_

          Similar content2,716

          See all similar

          Cited by155

          See all cited by