3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Regularly Incremented Phase Encoding – Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (RIPE-MRF) for Enhanced Motion Artifact Suppression in Preclinical Cartesian MR Fingerprinting

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The Regularly Incremented Phase Encoding – Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (RIPE-MRF) method is introduced to limit the sensitivity of preclinical MRF assessments to pulsatile and respiratory motion artifacts.

          Methods

          As compared to previously reported standard Cartesian MRF methods (SC-MRF), the proposed RIPE-MRF method uses a modified Cartesian trajectory that varies the acquired phase encoding line within each dynamic MRF dataset. Phantoms and mice were scanned without gating or triggering on a 7T preclinical MRI scanner using the RIPE-MRF and SC-MRF methods. In vitro phantom T 1 and T 2 measurements as well as in vivo liver assessments of artifact-to-noise ratio (ANR) and MRF-based T 1 and T 2 mean and standard deviation were compared between the two methods (n=5).

          Results

          RIPE-MRF showed significant ANR reductions in regions of pulsatility ( P<0.005) and respiratory motion ( P<0.0005). RIPE-MRF also exhibited improved precision in T 1 and T 2 measurements in comparison to the SC-MRF method ( P< 0.05). The RIPE-MRF and SC-MRF methods displayed similar mean T 1 and T 2 estimates (difference in mean values <10%).

          Conclusion

          These results show that the RIPE-MRF method can provide effective motion artifact suppression with minimal impact on T 1 and T 2 accuracy for in vivo small animal MRI studies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8505245
          5733
          Magn Reson Med
          Magn Reson Med
          Magnetic resonance in medicine
          0740-3194
          1522-2594
          19 December 2017
          10 August 2017
          April 2018
          01 April 2019
          : 79
          : 4
          : 2176-2182
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [2 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [3 ]Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [4 ]Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [5 ]Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          [6 ]Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author: Chris A. Flask, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Departments of Radiology, Biomedical Engineering, and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Bolwell Building, Room B115, caf@ 123456case.edu
          [†]

          These authors contributed equally to this work

          Article
          PMC5809208 PMC5809208 5809208 nihpa928095
          10.1002/mrm.26865
          5809208
          28796368
          7d6a633e-23f4-4a79-8f7d-506f36264a7a
          History
          Categories
          Article

          view ordering,artifact suppression,Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting,Cartesian trajectory,motion artifacts

          Comments

          Comment on this article