7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Continuous theta burst stimulation over the bilateral supplementary motor area in obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A clinical randomized single-blind sham-controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can cause substantial damage to quality of life. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a promising treatment for OCD patients with the advantages of safety and noninvasiveness.

          Objective

          The present study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy of cTBS over the bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA) for OCD patients with a single-blind, sham-controlled design.

          Methods

          Fifty-four OCD patients were randomized to receive active or sham cTBS treatment over the bilateral SMA for 4 weeks (five sessions per week, 20 sessions in total). Patients were assessed at baseline (week 0), the end of treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 8). Clinical scales included the YBOCS, HAMD 24, HAMA 14, and OBQ 44. Three behavioral tests were also conducted to explore the effect of cTBS on response inhibition and decision-making in OCD patients.

          Results

          The treatment response rates were not significantly different between the two groups at week 4 (active: 23.1% vs. sham: 16.7%, p = 0.571) and week 8 (active: 26.9% vs. sham: 16.7%, p = 0.382). Depression and anxiety improvements were significantly different between the two groups at week 4 (HAMD 24: F = 4.644, p = 0.037; HAMA 14: F = 5.219, p = 0.028). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the performance of three behavioral tests. The treatment satisfaction and dropout rates were not significantly different between the two groups.

          Conclusions

          The treatment of cTBS over the bilateral SMA was safe and tolerable, and it could significantly improve the depression and anxiety of OCD patients but was not enough to improve OCD symptoms in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

          This article is based on a consensus conference, which took place in Certosa di Pontignano, Siena (Italy) on March 7-9, 2008, intended to update the previous safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings. Over the past decade the scientific and medical community has had the opportunity to evaluate the safety record of research studies and clinical applications of TMS and repetitive TMS (rTMS). In these years the number of applications of conventional TMS has grown impressively, new paradigms of stimulation have been developed (e.g., patterned repetitive TMS) and technical advances have led to new device designs and to the real-time integration of TMS with electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thousands of healthy subjects and patients with various neurological and psychiatric diseases have undergone TMS allowing a better assessment of relative risks. The occurrence of seizures (i.e., the most serious TMS-related acute adverse effect) has been extremely rare, with most of the few new cases receiving rTMS exceeding previous guidelines, often in patients under treatment with drugs which potentially lower the seizure threshold. The present updated guidelines review issues of risk and safety of conventional TMS protocols, address the undesired effects and risks of emerging TMS interventions, the applications of TMS in patients with implanted electrodes in the central nervous system, and safety aspects of TMS in neuroimaging environments. We cover recommended limits of stimulation parameters and other important precautions, monitoring of subjects, expertise of the rTMS team, and ethical issues. While all the recommendations here are expert based, they utilize published data to the extent possible.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial

            Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder is common; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by use of high-frequency (10 Hz) left-side dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation is an evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer form of rTMS that can be delivered in 3 min, versus 37·5 min for a standard 10 Hz treatment session. We aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of iTBS compared with standard 10 Hz rTMS in adults with treatment-resistant depression.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects.

              Over the last ten years, an increasing number of authors have used the theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocol to investigate long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity non-invasively in the primary motor cortex (M1) in healthy humans and in patients with various types of movement disorders. We here provide a comprehensive review of the LTP/LTD-like plasticity induced by TBS in the human M1.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Psychiatry
                Eur Psychiatry
                EPA
                European Psychiatry
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                0924-9338
                1778-3585
                2022
                07 October 2022
                : 65
                : 1
                : e64
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine , Shanghai, China
                [ 2 ] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders , Shanghai, China
                Author notes
                [* ] Authors for correspondence: Zhen Wang and Qing Fan, E-mails: wangzhen@ 123456smhc.org.cn ; fanqing@ 123456smhc.org.cn

                Q.G. and K.W. are co-first authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-9862
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-1552
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-097X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-6609
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4319-5314
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0800-4842
                Article
                S0924933822023239
                10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2323
                9641651
                36203323
                7d424157-e87c-4c3b-8eb7-339877502a4b
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 21 June 2022
                : 21 September 2022
                : 22 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 5, References: 55, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                bilateral supplementary motor area,continuous theta burst stimulation,obsessive-compulsive disorder,treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article