11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Association of CEA, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP with Clinicopathological Characteristics and Chemotherapeutic Outcomes of Lung Cancer

      , , , , ,
      Laboratory Medicine
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The aim of this study was to investigate the association of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), nerve-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) with the clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapeutic outcomes of patients with lung cancer.

          Methods

          A total of 189 patients with lung cancer (lung cancer group) diagnosed at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to December 2021 were included. During the same period, 199 patients with benign lung disorders were included as the benign lung disease group and 75 healthy people were selected as the control group. The serum concentrations of CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP in all the 3 groups were analyzed and compared in patients with different lung cancer tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages and pathological classifications. A total of 11 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 18 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) were further evaluated for the dynamic changes of CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP before chemotherapy and during the 6 courses of chemotherapy, and the outcome of chemotherapy was evaluated every 2 courses.

          Results

          The serum concentrations of CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP in the lung cancer group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). We found statistically significant differences in serum CEA, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP among patients with different pathological types (LAC, squamous cell carcinoma, or SCLC) and different stages (I–IV). The ProGRP and NSE had the highest expression in SCLC, CEA showed the highest expression in LAC, whereas CYFRA21-1 and SCC-Ag showed the highest expression in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). The concentrations of all the markers were elevated in the advanced pathological stages. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the diagnostic value of the combined detection of CEA, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP for lung cancer was significantly higher than using a single biomarker (P < .05). Our dynamic monitoring results show that ProGRP progressively decreased in remission cases of SCLC and CEA progressively decreased in LAC remission cases.

          Conclusion

          CEA, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, SCC-Ag, and ProGRP have good clinical value in the early diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and progression monitoring of lung cancer. The ProGRP and CEA concentrations are beneficial for evaluating the outcome of chemotherapy in SCLC and LAC. The combined detection of multiple biomarkers shows improved clinical value in the early diagnosis of lung cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lung Cancer 2020

          Despite advances in our understanding of risk, development, immunologic control, and treatment options for lung cancer, it remains the leading cause of cancer death. Tobacco smoking remains the predominant risk factor for lung cancer development. Nontobacco risk factors include environmental and occupational exposures, chronic lung disease, lung infections, and lifestyle factors. Because tobacco remains the leading risk factor for lung cancer, disease prevention is focused on smoking avoidance and cessation. Other prevention measures include healthy diet choices and maintaining a physically active lifestyle. Future work should focus on smoking cessation campaigns and better understanding disease development and treatment strategies in nonsmokers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Epidemiology of lung cancer in China

            The incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer death in China, have significantly increased in recent years, and present geographic and gender differences as a result of diversity in lifestyles and socioeconomic development. A series of attribute risk analyses have shown that factors such as smoking, air pollution, and occupational factors are all related to lung cancer. Behavioral intervention, such as smoking cessation and screening, could effectively reduce lung cancer incidence and mortality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer.

              The use of CEA as a prognostic and predictive marker in patients with lung cancer is widely debated. The aim of this review was to evaluate the results from studies made on this subject. Using the search words "CEA", "tumor markers in lung cancer", "prognostic significance", "diagnostic significance" and "predictive significance", a search was carried out on PubMed. Exclusion criteria was articles never published in English, articles before 1981 and articles evaluating tumor markers in lung cancer not involving CEA. Initially 217 articles were found, and 34 were left after selecting those relevant for the present study. Four of these included both Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) patients, and 31 dealt solely with NSCLC patients. Regarding SCLC no studies showed that serum level of CEA was a prognostic marker for overall survival (OS). The use of CEA serum level as a prognostic marker in NSCLC was investigated in 23 studies and the use of CEA plasma level in two. In 18 (17 serum, 1 plasma) of these studies CEA was found to be a useful prognostic marker for either OS, recurrence after surgery or/and progression free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients. Interestingly, an overweight of low stage (stage I-II) disease and adenocarcinoma (AC) patients were observed in this group. The remaining 7 studies (6 serum, 1 plasma) contained an overweight of patients with squamous carcinoma (SQ). One study found evidence for that a tumor marker index (TMI), based on preoperative CEA and CYFRA21-1 serum levels, is useful as a prognostic marker for OS in NSCLC. Six studies evaluated the use of CEA as a predictive marker for risk of recurrence and risk of death in NSCLC patients. Four of these studies found, that CEA was useful as a predictive marker for risk of recurrence and risk of death measured over time. No studies found CEA levels useful as a diagnostic marker for lung cancer. With regard to NSCLC the level of CEA measured in tumor tissue in NSCLC patients, were not of prognostic, diagnostic or predictive significance for OS or recurrence after treatment. In one study CEA level was measured in Pleural Lavage Fluid (PLF) it was here found to be useful as prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) after surgery. In conclusion serum level of CEA carries prognostic and predictive information of risk of recurrence and of death in NSCLC independent of treatment or study design. The observation that TMI index could be a potential prognostic marker for OS in NSCLC is interesting. Future studies may benefit from evaluating more than one marker at a time, which may possibly create a more precise index for prognosis and recurrence in lung cancer, than is possible by the use of single biomarkers. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Laboratory Medicine
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0007-5027
                1943-7730
                October 25 2022
                October 25 2022
                Article
                10.1093/labmed/lmac122
                36282321
                7cdffbbe-1a9f-4a2b-8961-a3684faa4646
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article