21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Osteomyelitis is a complex disease. Treatment involves a combination of bone resection, antimicrobials and soft-tissue coverage. There is a difficulty in unifying a classification system for long bone osteomyelitis that is generally accepted.

          Objectives: In this systematic review, we aim to investigate the classification systems for long bone osteomyelitis that have been presented within the literature. By doing this, we hope to elucidate the important variables that are required when classifying osteomyelitis.

          Methods: A complete search of the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Ovid databases was undertaken. Following exclusion criteria, 13 classification systems for long-bone osteomyelitis were included for review.

          Results: The 13 classification systems that were included for review presented seven different variables that were used for classification. Ten of them used only one main variable, two used two variables and one used seven variables. The variables included bone involvement (used in 7 classification systems), acute versus chronic infection (used in 6), aetiopathogenesis (used in 3), host status (used in 3), soft tissue (used in 2), microbiology (used in 1) and location of infected bone (used in 1). The purpose of each classification system could be grouped as either descriptive (3 classification systems), prognostic (4) or for management (4). Two of the 13 classification systems were for both prognostic and management purposes.

          Conclusions: This systematic review has demonstrated a variety of variables used for classification of long bone osteomyelitis. While some variables are used to guide management and rehabilitation after surgery (e.g., bone defect, soft tissue coverage), others were postulated to provide prognostic information (e.g., host status). Finally, some variables were used for descriptive purposes only (aetiopathogenesis). In our view and from today's perspective, bone involvement, antimicrobial resistance patterns of causative micro-organisms, the need for soft-tissue coverage and host status are important variables to include in a classification system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Trends in the epidemiology of osteomyelitis: a population-based study, 1969 to 2009.

          The epidemiology of osteomyelitis in the United States is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine long-term secular trends in the incidence of osteomyelitis in a population-based setting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system.

            The outcomes of 50 consecutive patients with chronic periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty infections were evaluated based on a staging system developed at the authors' institution. The staging system includes three categories: infection type (acute versus chronic), systemic host grade, and local extremity grade. The initial treatment plan was a two-stage resection followed by reimplantation if clinically indicated. Treatment was modified for each patient according to how the patient responded to initial debridement. The average followup was 23.2 months (range, 0-74 months). Of the 50 patients, 29 had reimplantation with a total hip arthroplasty (58%), 17 patients had permanent resections (34%), and four patients had amputations (8%). Five patients died (10%). Fifteen patients had muscle flap transfers into the hip for soft tissue coverage. Significant correlations were seen with the staging system and outcome parameters. Patients who were very medically ill were far more likely to die or have their leg amputated. Conversely, healthier patients were more likely to have successful reimplantation. A strong correlation was seen with a compromised local wound and the need for muscle flap transfer. Complication rates were strongly related to worsening medical condition and a worsening local wound. Based on these results, a staging system for periprosthetic infection is a useful tool that with additional refinement will provide more objective evaluation of treatment methods for periprosthetic hip infection in the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Single-stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with a new absorbable, gentamicin-loaded, calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite: a prospective series of 100 cases.

              Chronic osteomyelitis may recur if dead space management, after excision of infected bone, is inadequate. This study describes the results of a strategy for the management of deep bone infection and evaluates a new antibiotic-loaded biocomposite in the eradication of infection from bone defects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Bone Jt Infect
                J Bone Jt Infect
                jbji
                Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
                Ivyspring International Publisher (Sydney )
                2206-3552
                2017
                12 September 2017
                : 2
                : 4
                : 167-174
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK;
                [2 ]Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK;
                [3 ]Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland;
                [4 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland;
                [5 ]Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, University Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
                Author notes
                ✉ Corresponding author: Parham Sendi, MD, FIDSA, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland E-mail: parham.sendi@ 123456ifik.unibe.ch

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

                Article
                jbjiv02p0167
                10.7150/jbji.21050
                5671929
                29119075
                7aa68bbd-2e05-42be-8501-372af52a875e
                © Ivyspring International Publisher

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.

                History
                : 16 May 2017
                : 11 August 2017
                Categories
                Review

                long-bone osteomyelitis,classification,bone and joint infection.

                Comments

                Comment on this article