11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparing isotropic and anisotropic smoothing for voxel‐based DTI analyses: A simulation study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Voxel‐based analysis (VBA) methods are increasingly being used to compare diffusion tensor image (DTI) properties across different populations of subjects. Although VBA has many advantages, its results are highly dependent on several parameter settings, such as those from the coregistration technique applied to align the data, the smoothing kernel, the statistics, and the post‐hoc analyses. In particular, to increase the signal‐to‐noise ratio and to mitigate the adverse effect of residual image misalignments, DTI data are often smoothed before VBA with an isotropic Gaussian kernel with a full width half maximum up to 16 × 16 × 16 mm 3. However, using isotropic smoothing kernels can significantly partial volume or voxel averaging artifacts, adversely affecting the true diffusion properties of the underlying fiber tissue. In this work, we compared VBA results between the isotropic and an anisotropic Gaussian filtering method using a simulated framework. Our results clearly demonstrate an increased sensitivity and specificity of detecting a predefined simulated pathology when the anisotropic smoothing kernel was used. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          wim.vanhecke@ua.ac.be
          Journal
          Hum Brain Mapp
          Hum Brain Mapp
          10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
          HBM
          Human Brain Mapping
          Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company (Hoboken )
          1065-9471
          1097-0193
          10 July 2009
          January 2010
          : 31
          : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/hbm.v31:1 )
          : 98-114
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ]Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
          [ 2 ]Department of Radiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
          [ 3 ]Department of Psychology, CUBRIC, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
          [ 4 ]Department of Radiology, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
          Author notes
          [*] [* ]Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, N 1.18, B‐2610 Antwerpen, Belgium
          Article
          PMC6871062 PMC6871062 6871062 HBM20848
          10.1002/hbm.20848
          6871062
          19593775
          7a7b529a-ab0e-4797-9890-dea3a9b4486b
          Copyright © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
          History
          : 18 February 2009
          : 03 June 2009
          : 04 June 2009
          Page count
          Figures: 7, Tables: 1, References: 84, Pages: 17, Words: 11279
          Categories
          Research Article
          Research Articles
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          January 2010
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.2 mode:remove_FC converted:15.11.2019

          voxel‐based analysis,diffusion tensor imaging,smoothing

          Comments

          Comment on this article