7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Qualitative Evaluation of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Delivery Model for Chronic Patients with Multi-Morbidity in the Basque Country

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          The objective of this study was to assess a model for improving healthcare integration for patients with multiple chronic diseases in an integrated healthcare organisation in the Basque Country and to propose areas for improvement.

          Methods:

          We organised four nominal groups composed of representatives from different categories of clinicians involved in the development of an integrated healthcare organisation and in the integrated care of patients with multiple diseases, namely, internists, general practitioners, and primary care and hospital nurses.

          Results:

          The aspect rated most positively was the concept itself of an integrated care model, which is able to improve communication between levels of care, increase the quality of the care provided and enhance patient safety. Additionally, it was agreed that the role of assigned clinicians is a key element. The problems identified mostly concern its implementation in daily practice.

          Conclusions:

          The results of this study made it possible to suggest at least 8 areas of improvement to be implemented. These are related to: nurses’ roles; care and monitoring of stable patients; team work; communication with patients; coordination with social workers and between internists and family doctors; as well as the development of an office of medical services to lead the integration process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Complexity science: complexity and clinical care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A conceptual model of the role of complexity in the care of patients with multiple chronic conditions.

            Effective healthcare for people with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) is a US priority, but the inherent complexity makes both research and delivery of care particularly challenging. As part of AHRQ Multiple Chronic Conditions Research Network (MCCRN) efforts, the Network developed a conceptual model to guide research in this area.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Out of context: clinical practice guidelines and patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.

              Poor fidelity to practice guidelines in the care of people with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) may result from patients and clinicians struggling to apply recommendations that do not consider the interplay of MCC, socio-personal context, and patient preferences. The objective of the study was to assess the quality of guideline development and the extent to which guidelines take into account 3 important factors: the impact of MCC, patients' socio-personal contexts, and patients' personal values and preferences. We conducted a systematic search of clinical practice guidelines for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus published between 2006 and 2012. Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, EBSCO CINAHL, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse were searched. Two reviewers working independently selected studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the guidelines. We found 28 eligible guidelines, which, on average, had major methodological limitations (AGREE II mean score 3.8 of 7, SD=1.6). Patients or methodologists were not included in the guideline development process in 20 (71%) and 24 (86%) guidelines, respectively. There was a complete absence of incorporating the impact of MCC, socio-personal context, and patient preferences in 8 (29%), 11 (39%), and 16 (57%) of the 28 guidelines, respectively. When mentioned, MCC were considered biologically, but not as contributors of complexity or patient work or as motivation to focus on patient-centered outcomes. Extant clinical practice guidelines for one chronic disease sometimes consider the context of the patient with that disease, but only do so narrowly. Guideline panels must remove their contextual blinders if they want to practically guide the care of patients with MCC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Integr Care
                Int J Integr Care
                1568-4156
                International Journal of Integrated Care
                Ubiquity Press
                1568-4156
                19 August 2016
                Jul-Sep 2016
                : 16
                : 3
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Management Unit, Tolosaldea Integrated Health Organisation, Basque Health Service (Osakidetza), Spain
                [2 ]Quality and Clinical Safety Unit, Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea, Spain
                [3 ]General Practitioner, Deusto Primary Health Centre, Osakidetza, Basque Country, Spain
                [4 ]Research, Innovation and Knowledge Management Unit, Department of Health, Government of Navarre, Spain
                Article
                10.5334/ijic.1975
                5350635
                7a1a90b7-cd7d-40a1-bd79-3239d4f248d9
                Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 05 December 2014
                : 01 August 2016
                Categories
                Research and Theory

                Health & Social care
                integrated care,family medicine,multi-morbidity,qualitative evaluation
                Health & Social care
                integrated care, family medicine, multi-morbidity, qualitative evaluation

                Comments

                Comment on this article