Hemolysis and Hemoglobin Structure and Function: A Team-Based Learning Exercise for a Medical School Hematology Course

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Introduction

This team-based learning (TBL) exercise focused on hemolysis and hemoglobin structure and function. The goal was to emphasize content that directly impacts clinical practice, but obliges students to understand underlying pathophysiology. The readiness assurance test (RAT) covers oxygen affinity, diagnosing hemolysis, inherited causes of hemolysis (G6PD deficiency, hereditary spherocytosis, sickle cell disease, thalassemia) and acquired causes of hemolysis (thrombotic microangiopathies, autoimmune hemolytic anemia). The application activity focused on thalassemia, sickle cell disease, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Methods

Second-year students were divided into teams of five to six students each with one facilitator for each classroom. Students completed an individual RAT (iRAT) followed by a group RAT (gRAT). The facilitator reviewed answers of the RATs emphasizing questions where there was a lack of clarity about the correct answer. Students completed the application activity within their teams followed by a discussion guided by the facilitator.

Results

On average, students answered 63% of answers correctly on the iRAT. The average team score on the gRAT was 26.7 out of 30 points. The session was well reviewed by both students and facilitators. Students ranked the quality of all facilitators as excellent with an average rating of 4.4 of 5. Exam scores improved compared to prior to the introduction of TBL, but this was also found for material not covered.

Discussion

The use of TBL to emphasize the relationship between pathophysiology and the diagnosis and management of patients was both an effective teaching method and a successful way to engage medical students.

Related collections

Most cited references 11

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.

Scott Freeman, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough … (2014)

To test the hypothesis that lecturing maximizes learning and course performance, we metaanalyzed 225 studies that reported data on examination scores or failure rates when comparing student performance in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses under traditional lecturing versus active learning. The effect sizes indicate that on average, student performance on examinations and concept inventories increased by 0.47 SDs under active learning (n = 158 studies), and that the odds ratio for failing was 1.95 under traditional lecturing (n = 67 studies). These results indicate that average examination scores improved by about 6% in active learning sections, and that students in classes with traditional lecturing were 1.5 times more likely to fail than were students in classes with active learning. Heterogeneity analyses indicated that both results hold across the STEM disciplines, that active learning increases scores on concept inventories more than on course examinations, and that active learning appears effective across all class sizes--although the greatest effects are in small (n ≤ 50) classes. Trim and fill analyses and fail-safe n calculations suggest that the results are not due to publication bias. The results also appear robust to variation in the methodological rigor of the included studies, based on the quality of controls over student quality and instructor identity. This is the largest and most comprehensive metaanalysis of undergraduate STEM education published to date. The results raise questions about the continued use of traditional lecturing as a control in research studies, and support active learning as the preferred, empirically validated teaching practice in regular classrooms.

0 comments Cited 776 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance.

Paul Koles, Adrienne Stolfi, Nicole Borges … (2010)

Since team-based learning (TBL) was introduced as a medical education strategy in 2001, few studies have explored its impact on learning outcomes, particularly as measured by performance on examinations. Educators considering implementing TBL need evidence of its effectiveness. This study was conducted to determine whether student performance on examinations is affected by participation in TBL and whether TBL benefits lower- or higher-performing students. The authors analyzed the performance of second-year medical students on 28 comprehensive course examinations over two consecutive academic years (2003-2004, 2004-2005) at the Boonshoft School of Medicine. The 178 students (86 men, 92 women) included in the study achieved 5.9% (standard deviation [SD] 5.5) higher mean scores on examination questions that assessed their knowledge of pathology-based content learned using the TBL strategy compared with questions assessing pathology-based content learned via other methods (P < .001, t test). Students whose overall academic performance placed them in the lowest quartile of the class benefited more from TBL than did those in the highest quartile. Lowest-quartile students' mean scores were 7.9% (SD 6.0) higher on examination questions related to TBL modules than examination questions not related to TBL modules, whereas highest-quartile students' mean scores were 3.8% (SD 5.4) higher (P = .001, two-way analysis of variance). Medical students' higher performance on examination questions related to course content learned through TBL suggests that TBL enhances mastery of course content. Students in the lowest academic quartile may benefit more than highest-quartile students from the TBL strategy.