8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Thermal Injury and Laser Efficiency with Holmium YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser-An In Vitro Study.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To evaluate using an inanimate model the thermal injury and laser efficiency on high frequency, high energy, and its combination in hands of junior and experienced urologists during holmium YAG (Ho:YAG) and Thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripsy. Methods: A Cyber: Ho 150 WTM and Fiber Dust TFL (Quanta System) with 200 μm core-diameter laser fibers (LF) were used in a saline in vitro ureteral model. Each participant (five junior and five experienced urologists) performed 32 sessions of 5-minute lasering (125 mm3 phantom BegoStones™), comparing four modes (3 J/5 Hz [1.5 W], 0.3 J/20 Hz [6 W], 1.2 J/5 Hz [6 W], and 1.2 J/20 Hz [24 W]). Transparent tip and cleaved LF, and digital and fiberoptic ureteroscopes were also compared. Ureteral damage was classified in a scale (0-5) according to the burns and holes seen in the ureteral model's surface. Results: High-power (HP) setting (24 W) was associated with higher delivered energy and higher ablation rates (ARs) in both lasers (p < 0.001). For the same power setting (6 W), there was no difference in delivered energy or stone ARs. Regardless the settings, a higher AR was observed with TFL than with Ho:YAG (0.5Δ mg/s ± 0.33 vs 0.39 Δmg/s ± 0.31, p = 0.002) laser. Higher mean AR was found with cleaved tip vs transparent tip (p = 0.03) in TFL. For both lasers, higher ureteral damage was observed in the 24 W group (p = 0.006) and in the junior urologists (p = 0.03). Between 6 W groups, different types of lesions were found and junior urologist have more lesions when high frequency was used, for both Ho:YAG (p = 0.05) and TFL (p = 0.04). Conclusion: More stone ARs and reduced operative time are observed in HP settings; however, more ureteral thermic-related damage is produced. When comparing the same power, higher energy or frequency does not modify the AR. Nonetheless, more ureteral thermic-related thermal damage is observed in high-frequency settings in unexperienced hands.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Endourol
          Journal of endourology
          Mary Ann Liebert Inc
          1557-900X
          0892-7790
          Dec 2022
          : 36
          : 12
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Sorbonne University, GRC Urolithiasis No. 20, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
          [2 ] Department of Urology, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
          Article
          10.1089/end.2022.0216
          35793107
          79db0c1a-9e3d-478a-bd4e-af1d7f194911
          History

          holmium YAG,Thulium fiber laser,urinary stones,thermal damage,laser settings,laser efficiency

          Comments

          Comment on this article