0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Use of virtual reality for the management of phantom limb pain: a systematic review

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

          Because of specific methodological difficulties in conducting randomized trials, surgical research remains dependent predominantly on observational or non-randomized studies. Few validated instruments are available to determine the methodological quality of such studies either from the reader's perspective or for the purpose of meta-analysis. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate such an instrument. After an initial conceptualization phase of a methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), a list of 12 potential items was sent to 100 experts from different surgical specialties for evaluation and was also assessed by 10 clinical methodologists. Subsequent testing involved the assessment of inter-reviewer agreement, test-retest reliability at 2 months, internal consistency reliability and external validity. The final version of MINORS contained 12 items, the first eight being specifically for non-comparative studies. Reliability was established on the basis of good inter-reviewer agreement, high test-retest reliability by the kappa-coefficient and good internal consistency by a high Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. External validity was established in terms of the ability of MINORS to identify excellent trials. MINORS is a valid instrument designed to assess the methodological quality of non-randomized surgical studies, whether comparative or non-comparative. The next step will be to determine its external validity when used in a large number of studies and to compare it with other existing instruments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.

            To estimate the current prevalence of limb loss in the United States and project the future prevalence to the year 2050. Estimates were constructed using age-, sex-, and race-specific incidence rates for amputation combined with age-, sex-, and race-specific assumptions about mortality. Incidence rates were derived from the 1988 to 1999 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, corrected for the likelihood of reamputation among those undergoing amputation for vascular disease. Incidence rates were assumed to remain constant over time and applied to historic mortality and population data along with the best available estimates of relative risk, future mortality, and future population projections. To investigate the sensitivity of our projections to increasing or decreasing incidence, we developed alternative sets of estimates of limb loss related to dysvascular conditions based on assumptions of a 10% or 25% increase or decrease in incidence of amputations for these conditions. Community, nonfederal, short-term hospitals in the United States. Persons who were discharged from a hospital with a procedure code for upper-limb or lower-limb amputation or diagnosis code of traumatic amputation. Not applicable. Prevalence of limb loss by age, sex, race, etiology, and level in 2005 and projections to the year 2050. In the year 2005, 1.6 million persons were living with the loss of a limb. Of these subjects, 42% were nonwhite and 38% had an amputation secondary to dysvascular disease with a comorbid diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. It is projected that the number of people living with the loss of a limb will more than double by the year 2050 to 3.6 million. If incidence rates secondary to dysvascular disease can be reduced by 10%, this number would be lowered by 225,000. One in 190 Americans is currently living with the loss of a limb. Unchecked, this number may double by the year 2050.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity?

              Phantom pain refers to pain in a body part that has been amputated or deafferented. It has often been viewed as a type of mental disorder or has been assumed to stem from pathological alterations in the region of the amputation stump. In the past decade, evidence has accumulated that phantom pain might be a phenomenon of the CNS that is related to plastic changes at several levels of the neuraxis and especially the cortex. Here, we discuss the evidence for putative pathophysiological mechanisms with an emphasis on central, and in particular cortical, changes. We cite both animal and human studies and derive suggestions for innovative interventions aimed at alleviating phantom pain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Disability and Rehabilitation
                Disability and Rehabilitation
                Informa UK Limited
                0963-8288
                1464-5165
                February 01 2023
                : 1-8
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [2 ]Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [3 ]Mount Sinai Hospital, University Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Toronto, Canada
                [4 ]Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
                [5 ]Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
                Article
                10.1080/09638288.2023.2172222
                78709076-d913-43ad-a227-fe78382323f3
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article