10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Amelioration of post-traumatic osteoarthritis via nanoparticle depots delivering small interfering RNA to damaged cartilage

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The progression of osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with inflammation triggered by the enzymatic degradation of extracellular matrix in injured cartilage. Here, we show that a locally injected depot of nanoparticles functionalized with an antibody targeting collagen type-II and carrying small interfering RNA for matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13), which breaks down collagen type-II, substantially reduced the expression of MMP13 and protected cartilage integrity and overall joint structure in acute and severe mouse models of post-traumatic OA. MMP13 inhibition suppressed clusters of genes associated with tissue restructuring, angiogenesis, innate immune responses and proteolysis. We also show that intra-articular injections of the nanoparticles led to higher reductions in disease progression than either a single injection or weekly injections of the steroid methylprednisolone. Sustained drug retention by targeting collagen in the damaged extracellular matrix of osteoarthritic cartilage may also be an effective strategy for the treatment of OA with other disease-modifying drugs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effect of nanoparticle size on in vivo pharmacokinetics and cellular interaction.

          Nanoparticle-based technologies offer exciting new approaches to disease diagnostics and therapeutics. To take advantage of unique properties of nanoscale materials and structures, the size, shape and/or surface chemistry of nanoparticles need to be optimized, allowing their functionalities to be tailored for different biomedical applications. Here we review the effects of nanoparticle size on cellular interaction and in vivo pharmacokinetics, including cellular uptake, biodistribution and circulation half-life of nanoparticles. Important features of nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging and modeling of nanoparticle size effects are also discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis.

            To develop concise, up-to-date, patient-focused, evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA), intended to inform patients, physicians, and allied healthcare professionals worldwide. Thirteen experts from relevant medical disciplines (primary care, rheumatology, orthopedics, physical therapy, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and evidence-based medicine), three continents and ten countries (USA, UK, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, Japan, and Canada) and a patient representative comprised the Osteoarthritis Guidelines Development Group (OAGDG). Based on previous OA guidelines and a systematic review of the OA literature, 29 treatment modalities were considered for recommendation. Evidence published subsequent to the 2010 OARSI guidelines was based on a systematic review conducted by the OA Research Society International (OARSI) evidence team at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA. Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were initially searched in first quarter 2012 and last searched in March 2013. Included evidence was assessed for quality using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) criteria, and published criticism of included evidence was also considered. To provide recommendations for individuals with a range of health profiles and OA burden, treatment recommendations were stratified into four clinical sub-phenotypes. Consensus recommendations were produced using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Delphi voting process. Treatments were recommended as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Not Appropriate, for each of four clinical sub-phenotypes and accompanied by 1-10 risk and benefit scores. Appropriate treatment modalities for all individuals with knee OA included biomechanical interventions, intra-articular corticosteroids, exercise (land-based and water-based), self-management and education, strength training, and weight management. Treatments appropriate for specific clinical sub-phenotypes included acetaminophen (paracetamol), balneotherapy, capsaicin, cane (walking stick), duloxetine, oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; COX-2 selective and non-selective), and topical NSAIDs. Treatments of uncertain appropriateness for specific clinical sub-phenotypes included acupuncture, avocado soybean unsaponfiables, chondroitin, crutches, diacerein, glucosamine, intra-articular hyaluronic acid, opioids (oral and transdermal), rosehip, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasound. Treatments voted not appropriate included risedronate and electrotherapy (neuromuscular electrical stimulation). These evidence-based consensus recommendations provide guidance to patients and practitioners on treatments applicable to all individuals with knee OA, as well as therapies that can be considered according to individualized patient needs and preferences. Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The OARSI histopathology initiative - recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse.

              To describe a histologic scoring system for murine osteoarthritis (OA) that can be applied universally to instability, enzymatic, transgenic and spontaneous OA models. Scientists with expertise in assessing murine OA histopathology reviewed the merits and drawbacks of methods described in the literature. A semi-quantitative scoring system that could reasonably be employed in any basic cartilage histology laboratory was proposed. This scoring system was applied to a set of 10 images of the medial tibial plateau and femoral condyle to yield 20 scores. These images were scored twice by four experienced scorers (CL, SG, MC, TA), with a minimum time interval of 1 week between scores to obtain intra-observer variability. An additional three novice scorers (CR, CL and MM) with no previous experience evaluated the images to determine the ease of use and reproducibility across laboratories. The semi-quantitative scoring system was relatively easy to apply for both experienced and novice scorers and the results had low inter- and intra-scorer variability. The variation in scores across both the experienced and novice scorers was low for both tibia and femur, with the tibia always having greater consistency. The semi-quantitative scoring system recommended here is simple to apply and required no specialized equipment. Scoring of the tibial plateaus was highly reproducible and more consistent than that of the femur due to the much thinner femoral cartilage. This scoring system may be a useful tool for both new and experienced scorers to sensitively evaluate models and OA mechanisms, and also provide a common paradigm for comparative evaluation across the many groups performing these analyses. Copyright © 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101696896
                45929
                Nat Biomed Eng
                Nat Biomed Eng
                Nature biomedical engineering
                2157-846X
                2 September 2021
                19 August 2021
                September 2021
                19 February 2022
                : 5
                : 9
                : 1069-1083
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Place PMB 351826 Nashville, TN 37235-1826
                [2 ]Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave. South, Suite C-3322 Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2561
                [3 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Memphis VA Medical Center, 1211 Union Ave. Suite 520 Memphis, TN 38104
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, Nashville, TN 37232
                Author notes

                Author contributions

                S.B., C.D., K.H., L.C., and J.C. designed the project and experiments. S.B. synthesized the polymers, conjugates, and formulated nanoparticles for all experiments. S.B. and F.Y. conducted all animal experiments. S.B., M.J., and D.L. performed nanoparticle characterization. S.B., F.Y., J.C., and D.L. imaged and collected tissues. L.H. and H.C. conducted histology and immunohistochemistry with L.H. performing blinded scoring of histology. S.B., C.D., and J.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

                [* ] Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to C.L.D. craig.duvall@ 123456vanderbilt.edu
                Article
                NIHMS1723507
                10.1038/s41551-021-00780-3
                8497446
                34413494
                76d41147-c2b7-449e-aca6-b72113241159

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article