48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Phospholipase C in Living Cells : Activation, Inhibition, Ca 2+ Requirement, and Regulation of M Current

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We have further tested the hypothesis that receptor-mediated modulation of KCNQ channels involves depletion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP 2) by phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC). We used four parallel assays to characterize the agonist-induced PLC response of cells (tsA or CHO cells) expressing M 1 muscarinic receptors: translocation of two fluorescent probes for membrane lipids, release of calcium from intracellular stores, and chemical measurement of acidic lipids. Occupation of M 1 receptors activates PLC and consumes cellular PIP 2 in less than a minute and also partially depletes mono- and unphosphorylated phosphoinositides. KCNQ current is simultaneously suppressed. Two inhibitors of PLC, U73122 and edelfosine (ET-18-OCH 3), can block the muscarinic actions completely, including suppression of KCNQ current. However, U73122 also had many side effects that were attributable to alkylation of various proteins. These were mimicked or occluded by prior reaction with the alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide and included block of pertussis toxin–sensitive G proteins and effects that resembled a weak activation of PLC or an inhibition of lipid kinases. By our functional criteria, the putative PLC activator m-3M3FBS did stimulate PLC, but with a delay and an irregular time course. It also suppressed KCNQ current. The M 1 receptor–mediated activation of PLC and suppression of KCNQ current were stopped by lowering intracellular calcium well below resting levels and were slowed by not allowing intracellular calcium to rise in response to PLC activation. Thus calcium release induced by PLC activation feeds back immediately on PLC, accelerating it during muscarinic stimulation in strong positive feedback. These experiments clarify important properties of receptor-coupled PLC responses and their inhibition in the context of the living cell. In each test, the suppression of KCNQ current closely paralleled the expected fall of PIP 2. The results are described by a kinetic model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Receptor-induced transient reduction in plasma membrane PtdIns(4,5)P2 concentration monitored in living cells.

          Although phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) is a well-characterized precursor for the second messengers inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, diacylglycerol [1] and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate [2], it also interacts with the actin-binding proteins profilin and gelsolin [3], as well as with many signaling molecules that contain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains [4]. It is conceivable that stimuli received by receptors in the plasma membrane could be sufficiently strong to decrease the PtdIns(4,5)P2 concentration; this decrease could alter the structure of the cortical cytoskeleton and modulate the activity of signaling molecules that have PH domains. Here, we tested this hypothesis by using an in vivo fluorescent indicator for PtdIns(4,5)P2, by tagging the PH domain of phospholipase C delta 1 (PLC-delta 1) with the green fluorescent protein (GFP-PH). When expressed in cells, GFP-PH was found to be enriched at the plasma membrane. Binding studies in vitro and mutant analysis suggested that GFP-PH bound PtdIns(4,5)P2 selectively over other phosphatidylinositol lipids. Strikingly, receptor stimulation induced a transient dissociation of GFP-PH from the plasma membrane, suggesting that the concentration of PtdIns(4,5)P2 in the plasma membrane was effectively lowered. This transient dissociation was blocked by the PLC inhibitor U73122 but was not affected by the phosphoinositide (PI) 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin, suggesting that it is mostly mediated by PLC and not by PI 3-kinase activation. Overall, our studies show that PtdIns(4,5)P2 can have second messenger functions of its own, by mediating a transient dissociation of proteins anchored in the plasma membrane.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phosphoinositide regulation of the actin cytoskeleton.

            Phosphoinositides [PPIs, which collectively refer to phosphorylated derivatives of phosphatidylinositol (PI)] have a pivotal role as precursors to important second messengers and as bona fide signaling and scaffold targeting molecules. This review focuses on recent advances that elucidate how PPIs, particularly PI(4,5)P2 (PIP2), directly regulate the actin cytoskeleton in vivo by modulating the activity and targeting of actin regulatory proteins. The role of PIP2 in stimulating actin polymerization and in establishing cytoskeleton-plasma membrane linkages is emphasized. In addition, the review presents tantalizing evidence that suggests how binding of selected cytoskeletal proteins to membrane PPIs may promote PPI clustering into raft lipid microdomains, alter their accessibility to other proteins, and even distort the bilayer conformation. These actions have profound implications for many other PPI-regulated membrane functions that are beginning to be uncovered, and they suggest how PPIs can mediate crosstalk between the actin cytoskeleton and an expanding spectrum of essential cellular functions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Phosphoinositide recognition domains.

              Domains or modules known to bind phosphoinositides have increased dramatically in number over the past few years, and are found in proteins involved in intracellular trafficking, cellular signaling, and cytoskeletal remodeling. Analysis of lipid binding by these domains and its structural basis has provided significant insight into the mechanism of membrane recruitment by the different cellular phosphoinositides. Domains that target only the rare (3-phosphorylated) phosphoinositides must bind with very high affinity, and with exquisite specificity. This is achieved solely by headgroup interactions in the case of certain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains [which bind PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and/or PtdIns(3,4)P2], but requires an additional membrane-insertion and/or oligomerization component in the case of the PtdIns(3)P-targeting phox homology (PX) and FYVE domains. Domains that target PtdIns(4,5)P2, which is more abundant by some 25-fold, do not require the same stringent affinity and specificity characteristics, and tend to be more diverse in structure. The mode of phosphoinositide binding by different domains also appears to reflect their distinct functions. For example, pleckstrin homology domains that serve as simple targeting domains recognize only phosphoinositide headgroups. By contrast, certain other domains, notably the epsin ENTH domain, appear to promote bilayer curvature by inserting into the membrane upon binding.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Gen Physiol
                The Journal of General Physiology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0022-1295
                1540-7748
                September 2005
                : 126
                : 3
                : 243-262
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195
                [2 ]Department of Physiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390
                [3 ]Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195
                Author notes

                Correspondence to Bertil Hille: hille@ 123456u.washington.edu

                Article
                200509309
                10.1085/jgp.200509309
                2266577
                16129772
                7635860b-fa54-49ad-8e06-6df23857ea81
                Copyright © 2005, The Rockefeller University Press
                History
                : 28 April 2005
                : 19 July 2005
                Categories
                Article

                Anatomy & Physiology
                Anatomy & Physiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content380

                Cited by67

                Most referenced authors2,997