9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Affective communication with patients with limited health literacy in the palliative phase of COPD or lung cancer: Analysis of video-recorded consultations in outpatient care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Affective communication in outpatient care is important, especially in the palliative phase. Appropriate responses by healthcare providers to emotional cues or concerns let patients express their feelings and enhance information recall and patient satisfaction. Patients with limited health literacy experience more barriers in health-related communication and information, which makes recognizing their cues and concerns even more relevant. This study explores emotional cues/concerns expressed by patients with limited health literacy and evaluates healthcare providers’ responses to these utterances.

          Methods

          Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES), a consensus-based system for coding patients’ expression of emotional distress in medical consultations, was used in this exploratory observational study to analyse affective communication in video-recorded outpatient consultations. Consultations of 18 (10 female, 8 male) COPD or lung cancer patients (aged 70.3±6.8) with limited health literacy were recorded and analysed. Eight healthcare providers in four hospitals participated in the study.

          Results

          101 cues and 11 concerns were observed, making 6.2 (SD = 4.2) cues or concerns per consultation. Healthcare provider responses were explicit in 56% and left scope for further disclosures in 58% of the cases. Patients with limited health literacy seem to express more cues or concerns than other patient populations. Healthcare providers responded roughly equally often in five different ways, but they shied away from further exploring the emotion disclosed in the cue/concern. Future research should elaborate on these exploratory observations, especially regarding why HCPs often only leave limited space for further disclosure of emotions in palliative care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models

          Background Health literacy concerns the knowledge and competences of persons to meet the complex demands of health in modern society. Although its importance is increasingly recognised, there is no consensus about the definition of health literacy or about its conceptual dimensions, which limits the possibilities for measurement and comparison. The aim of the study is to review definitions and models on health literacy to develop an integrated definition and conceptual model capturing the most comprehensive evidence-based dimensions of health literacy. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify definitions and conceptual frameworks of health literacy. A content analysis of the definitions and conceptual frameworks was carried out to identify the central dimensions of health literacy and develop an integrated model. Results The review resulted in 17 definitions of health literacy and 12 conceptual models. Based on the content analysis, an integrative conceptual model was developed containing 12 dimensions referring to the knowledge, motivation and competencies of accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health-related information within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion setting, respectively. Conclusions Based upon this review, a model is proposed integrating medical and public health views of health literacy. The model can serve as a basis for developing health literacy enhancing interventions and provide a conceptual basis for the development and validation of measurement tools, capturing the different dimensions of health literacy within the healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.

              No practical method for identifying patients with low heath literacy exists. We sought to develop screening questions for identifying patients with inadequate or marginal health literacy. Patients (n=332) at a VA preoperative clinic completed in-person interviews that included 16 health literacy screening questions on a 5-point Likert scale, followed by a validated health literacy measure, the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (STOHFLA). Based on the STOFHLA, patients were classified as having either inadequate, marginal, or adequate health literacy. Each of the 16 screening questions was evaluated and compared to two comparison standards: (1) inadequate health literacy and (2) inadequate or marginal health literacy on the STOHFLA. Fifteen participants (4.5%) had inadequate health literacy and 25 (7.5%) had marginal health literacy on the STOHFLA. Three of the screening questions, "How often do you have someone help you read hospital materials?" "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" and "How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?" were effective in detecting inadequate health literacy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively). These questions were weaker for identifying patients with marginal health literacy. Three questions were each effective screening tests for inadequate health literacy in this population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                10 February 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 2
                : e0263433
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [2 ] Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
                [3 ] Breuer&Intraval, Research and Consultancy, Research Department, Groningen, the Netherlands
                [4 ] Pharos, Dutch Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, the Netherlands
                [5 ] Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
                Universiteit van Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7792-0660
                Article
                PONE-D-21-01177
                10.1371/journal.pone.0263433
                8830703
                35143534
                759b40b2-8a55-43b2-a559-0f683e624565
                © 2022 Otte et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 January 2021
                : 19 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003298, Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek van de Gezondheidszorg;
                Award ID: 844001403
                This study was funded by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Palliative Care Programme (ZonMw, Palliantie: 844001403) ( https://www.zonmw.nl/nl/). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Education and Awareness
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Lung and Intrathoracic Tumors
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Patients
                Outpatients
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Custom metadata
                Data from this study are available upon request due to the fact that the data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, and because they are owned by a third party, Nivel. The authors did not have any special privileged access to the data Requests for the data can be made to Nivel: Postal address: P.O. Box 1568 3500 BN Utrecht The Netherlands Tel: +31 (0)30 – 2729700 E-mail: receptie@ 123456nivel.nl Visiting adress: Otterstraat 118-124 3513CR Utrecht The Netherlands.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article