Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integrating dissemination and implementation sciences within Clinical and Translational Science Award programs to advance translational research: Recommendations to national and local leaders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) has defined translation as the process of turning observations into interventions that are adopted, sustained, and improve health. Translation must attend to research and community systems and context at multiple levels, and to key stakeholders. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) sciences are informed by an understanding of the critical role of people and systems in disseminating, adopting, and sustaining innovations within real-world settings. Thus, the D&I sciences provides a set of principles that can guide the translational work of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) programs from basic research to public health. In this special communication, our cross-domain working group of the CTSA consortium, comprised of experts in methods and processes, workforce development, evaluation, stakeholder engagement, and D&I sciences, share a vision of how CTSAs can enhance translation across the translational spectrum through the integration of D&I sciences into the critical areas of methods and processes, workforce development, and evaluation. We propose a set of recommendations for NCATS national and local leaders that are intended to move D&I sciences out of a position of unfamiliarity and ancillary value and into the core identity of who CTSAs are, how they think, and what they do, to advance translation and health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care.

          There is strong interest in implementation science to address the gap between research and practice in public health. Research on the sustainability of evidence-based interventions has been growing rapidly. Sustainability has been defined as the continued use of program components at sufficient intensity for the sustained achievement of desirable program goals and population outcomes. This understudied area has been identified as one of the most significant translational research problems. Adding to this challenge is uncertainty regarding the extent to which intervention adaptation and evolution are necessary to address the needs of populations that differ from those in which interventions were originally tested or implemented. This review critically examines and discusses conceptual and methodological issues in studying sustainability, summarizes the multilevel factors that have been found to influence the sustainability of interventions in a range of public health and health care settings, and highlights key areas for future research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States.

            We have described the practice of designing for dissemination among researchers in the United States with the intent of identifying gaps and areas for improvement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation.

              Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) requires active collaboration between researchers and the ultimate users of knowledge throughout a research process, and is being aggressively positioned as an essential strategy to address the problem of underutilization of research-derived knowledge. The purpose of this commentary is to assist potential "knowledge users", particularly those working in policy or service settings, by highlighting some of the more nuanced benefits of the IKT model, as well as some of its potential costs. Actionable outcomes may not be immediately (or ever) forthcoming, but the process of collaboration can result in group-level identity transformation that permits access to different professional perspectives as well as, we suggest, added organizational and social value. As well, the IKT approach provides space for the re-balancing of what is considered "expertise". We offer this paper to help practitioners, administrators and policymakers more realistically assess the potential benefits and costs of engaging in IKT-oriented research. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Transl Sci
                J Clin Transl Sci
                CTS
                Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2059-8661
                2021
                12 July 2021
                : 5
                : 1
                : e151
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Center for Clinical Translational Science, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, IL, USA
                [ 2 ]The Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin , Madison, WI, USA
                [ 3 ]Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
                [ 4 ]National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center , San Antonio, TX, USA
                [ 5 ]Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester , Rochester, NY, USA
                [ 6 ]Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of California , Davis, CA, USA
                [ 7 ]Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
                [ 8 ]Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine , Durham, NC, USA
                [ 9 ]Clinican and Translational Science Institute & Department of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
                [ 10 ]Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
                [ 11 ]New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: T.G. Mehta, PhD, Institute for Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago , 1747 West Roosevelt Rd., Chicago, IL 60608, USA Phone: 312-996-3910. Email: tmehta@ 123456uic.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2468-5919
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9002-7121
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7317-9468
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-0538
                Article
                S2059866121008153
                10.1017/cts.2021.815
                8411263
                34527291
                740ed78d-d4ae-41e8-ab4e-6cd994692f0a
                © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 March 2021
                : 01 July 2021
                : 02 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 32, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Special Communications
                Implementation, Policy and Community Engagement

                translational science,implementation science,ctsa,workforce,methods,evaluation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content64

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors383