1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Normoxic Adult Patients With COVID-19 Infection in the Emergency Department: A Preliminary Observation

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor Current concepts suggest that local elaboration of nitric oxide (NO) modulates, in part, the intense pro-inflammatory phenomena observed in lungs of patients with certain respiratory viral infections [1]. To that end, fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) monitoring is proposed as simple, portable, noninvasive, cost-effective, point-of-care biomarker of pulmonary inflammation in patients with viral-induced acute lung injury [1-3]. However, the effects of acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)) infection on FeNO levels in human subjects requiring supplemental oxygen therapy is controversial. For instance, Exline et al [2] reported high FeNO levels in hospitalized, mechanically-ventilated patients with COVID-19 infection. By contrast, Lior et al [3] showed recently that FeNO levels were decreased in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 infection and that admission FeNO < 11.8 ppb heralded adverse outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, no studies to date have determined FeNO levels in normoxic patients with COVID-19 infection seen in the emergency department. We posit that under these circumstances FeNO could be used as noninvasive biomarker to identify infected patients at greater risk of disease progression and/or worse prognosis and to devise a care plan accordingly. To begin to address these issues, we determined FeNO levels in normoxic adult patients with rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test-documented COVID-19 infection seen in the emergency department of a large, tertiary care hospital in Chicago, IL, USA. None required supplemental oxygen nor received COVID-19-related medications at the time FeNO was determined. A hand-held NIOX VERO® Airway Inflammation Monitor (Circassia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA) was used to determine FeNO levels in 18 eligible patients, 64 ± 15 years (mean ± standard deviation (SD); 17 males) presenting to the Emergency Department of Jesse Brown VA Medical Center and in 18 healthy, non-smoking volunteers between December 2020 and June 2021. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared NIOX VERO® monitor deploys an electrochemical sensor technology as analytical method and an external quality control procedure to ascertain reliability of measured values [4]. In each subject, FeNO determination conformed with the American Thoracic Society (ATS) clinical practice guidelines [5]. Although these patients presented with respiratory complaints, such as persistent cough and dyspnea, all were able to perform adequate FeNO measurements as instructed. Data are reported as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using paired Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by Jesse Brown VA Medical Center institutional review board (IRB) (approval number: 1574706-1). Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) in patients with COVID-19 was 96±3% during FeNO testing. FeNO levels in patients and healthy volunteers were 18.11 ± 10.07 and 13.33 ± 4.64 ppb, respectively (P = not significant (NS)). Fourteen patients (78%) were subsequently hospitalized of which one died. Our small, single-site, prospective study shows that FeNO levels in normoxic adult patients presenting to the emergency department with COVID-19 infection are similar to those of healthy, non-smoking volunteers. This observation is noteworthy because most our patients (14/18) were subsequently hospitalized attesting to the severity of their illness. However, the small sample size precludes meaningful evaluation of FeNO as a simple, bedside, noninvasive biomarker of risk stratification of normoxic patients with COVID-19 infection seen in the emergency department. The reason(s) underlying the discrepant reports about FeNO levels in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection is uncertain [2, 3]. Conceivably, differences in patient characteristics, such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, disease severity, and therapeutic interventions at the time of FeNO testing could account, in part, for these observations. For instance, hypoxia has been shown to increase FeNO levels while short-term hyperoxia decreases FeNO levels for several hours in human subjects [6, 7]. In summary, we propose that larger, well-controlled, prospective studies are warranted to determine the utility of point-of-care FeNO monitoring as noninvasive biomarker of risk stratification of patients with COVID-19 infection seen in the emergency department.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications.

          Measurement of fractional nitric oxide (NO) concentration in exhaled breath (Fe(NO)) is a quantitative, noninvasive, simple, and safe method of measuring airway inflammation that provides a complementary tool to other ways of assessing airways disease, including asthma. While Fe(NO) measurement has been standardized, there is currently no reference guideline for practicing health care providers to guide them in the appropriate use and interpretation of Fe(NO) in clinical practice. To develop evidence-based guidelines for the interpretation of Fe(NO) measurements that incorporate evidence that has accumulated over the past decade. We created a multidisciplinary committee with expertise in the clinical care, clinical science, or basic science of airway disease and/or NO. The committee identified important clinical questions, synthesized the evidence, and formulated recommendations. Recommendations were developed using pragmatic systematic reviews of the literature and the GRADE approach. The evidence related to the use of Fe(NO) measurements is reviewed and clinical practice recommendations are provided. In the setting of chronic inflammatory airway disease including asthma, conventional tests such as FEV(1) reversibility or provocation tests are only indirectly associated with airway inflammation. Fe(NO) offers added advantages for patient care including, but not limited to (1) detecting of eosinophilic airway inflammation, (2) determining the likelihood of corticosteroid responsiveness, (3) monitoring of airway inflammation to determine the potential need for corticosteroid, and (4) unmasking of otherwise unsuspected nonadherence to corticosteroid therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Exhaled nitric oxide detection for diagnosis of COVID-19 in critically ill patients

            Background COVID-19 may present with a variety of clinical syndromes, however, the upper airway and the lower respiratory tract are the principle sites of infection. Previous work on respiratory viral infections demonstrated that airway inflammation results in the release of volatile organic compounds as well as nitric oxide. The detection of these gases from patients’ exhaled breath offers a novel potential diagnostic target for COVID-19 that would offer real-time screening of patients for COVID-19 infection. Methods and findings We present here a breath tester utilizing a catalytically active material, which allows for the temporal manifestation of the gaseous biomarkers’ interactions with the sensor, thus giving a distinct breath print of the disease. A total of 46 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on mechanical ventilation participated in the study, 23 with active COVID-19 respiratory infection and 23 non-COVID-19 controls. Exhaled breath bags were collected on ICU days 1, 3, 7, and 10 or until liberation from mechanical ventilation. The breathalyzer detected high exhaled nitric oxide (NO) concentration with a distinctive pattern for patients with active COVID-19 pneumonia. The COVID-19 “breath print” has the pattern of the small Greek letter omega (). The “breath print” identified patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with 88% accuracy upon their admission to the ICU. Furthermore, the sensitivity index of the breath print (which scales with the concentration of the key biomarker ammonia) appears to correlate with duration of COVID-19 infection. Conclusions The implication of this breath tester technology for the rapid screening for COVID-19 and potentially detection of other infectious diseases in the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) level as a predictor of COVID-19 disease severity

              Objective To assess the feasibility of Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) as a simple, non-invasive, cost-effective and portable biomarker and decision support tool for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients. Methods We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients whose FeNO levels were measured upon ward admission by the Vivatmo-me handheld device. Demographics, COVID-19 symptoms, and relevant hospitalization details were retrieved from the hospital databases. The patients were divided into those discharged to recover at home and those who died during hospitalization or required admission to an intensive care unit, internal medicine ward, or dedicated facility (severe outcomes group). Results Fifty-six patients were enrolled. The only significant demographic difference between the severe outcomes patients (n = 14) and the home discharge patients (n = 42) was age (64.21 ± 13.97 vs. 53.98 ± 15.57 years, respectively, P = .04). The admission FeNO measurement was significantly lower in the former group compared with the latter group (15.86 ± 14.74 vs. 25.77 ± 13.79, parts per billion [PPB], respectively, P = .008). Time to severe outcome among patients with FeNO measurements ≤11.8 PPB was significantly shorter compared with patients whose FeNO measured >11.8 PPB (19.25 ± 2.96 vs. 24.41 ± 1.09 days, respectively, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 4.25). An admission FeNO ≤11.8 PPB was a significant risk factor for severe outcomes (odds ratio = 12.8, 95% CI: 2.78 to 58.88, P = .001), with a receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.752. Conclusions FeNO measurements by the Vivatmo-me handheld device can serve as a biomarker and COVID-19 support tool for medical teams. These easy-to-use, portable, and noninvasive devices may serve as valuable ED bedside tools during a pandemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med Res
                J Clin Med Res
                Elmer Press
                Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
                Elmer Press
                1918-3003
                1918-3011
                July 2022
                29 July 2022
                : 14
                : 7
                : 291-292
                Affiliations
                [a ]Emergency Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
                [b ]Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
                [c ]Department of Medicine, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
                [d ]Research & Development Services, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
                [e ]Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
                Author notes
                [f ]Corresponding Author: Israel Rubinstein, Department of Medicine (M/C 719), University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Email: irubinst@ 123456uic.edu
                Article
                10.14740/jocmr4755
                9365665
                35974807
                73cb47a8-5f48-4ebe-8f68-c4c5571028b1
                Copyright 2022, Elfessi et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 1 June 2022
                : 13 July 2022
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article