64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Physician-Nurse Substitution on Clinical Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Physicians’ shortage in many countries and demands of high-quality and affordable care make physician-nurse substitution an appealing workforce strategy. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of physician-nurse substitution in primary care on clinical parameters.

          Methods

          We systematically searched OVID Medline and Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL, up to August 2012; selected peer-reviewed RCTs comparing physician-led care with nurse-led care on changes in clinical parameters. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate by independent reviewers. We assessed the individual study risk of bias; calculated the study-specific and pooled relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD); and performed fixed-effects meta-analyses.

          Results

          11 RCTs (N = 30,247) were included; most were from Europe, generally small with higher risk of bias. In all studies, nurses provided care for complex conditions including HIV, hypertension, heart failure, cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes, asthma, Parkinson’s disease and incontinence. Meta-analyses showed greater reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) in favour of nurse-led care (WMD −4.27 mmHg, 95% CI −6.31 to −2.23) but no statistically significant differences between groups in the reduction of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD −1.48 mmHg, 95%CI −3.05 to −0.09), total cholesterol (TC) (WMD -0.08 mmol/l, 95%CI -0.22 to 0.07) or glycosylated haemoglobin (WMD 0.12%HbAc1, 95%CI -0.13 to 0.37). Of other 32 clinical parameters identified, less than a fifth favoured nurse-led care while 25 showed no significant differences between groups.

          Limitations

          disease-specific interventions from a small selection of healthcare systems, insufficient quantity and quality of studies, many different parameters.

          Conclusions

          trained nurses appeared to be better than physicians at lowering SBP but similar at lowering DBP, TC or HbA1c. There is insufficient evidence that nurse-led care leads to better outcomes of other clinical parameters than physician-led care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                24 February 2014
                : 9
                : 2
                : e89181
                Affiliations
                [1]Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Republic of Islamic)
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: NAMG RT SD FHG TR. Performed the experiments: NAMG SD FHG. Analyzed the data: NAMG. Wrote the paper: NAMG. Consensus of data: SM. Revised the manuscript: NAMG TR. Approved the final version of the manuscript: NAMG RT SD FHG SM TR.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-39941
                10.1371/journal.pone.0089181
                3933531
                24586577
                738e71cb-743a-47b9-9fb4-70c366cb804f
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 September 2013
                : 16 January 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                This study was funded by the Health Services Research Fund (Bangerter foundation) from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMW) and by the Swiss Association of Family Physicians (Hausärzte Schweiz). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine
                Cardiovascular
                Heart failure
                Hypertension
                Clinical research design
                Clinical trials
                Meta-analyses
                Systematic reviews
                Endocrinology
                Diabetic endocrinology
                Diabetes mellitus type 1
                Diabetes mellitus type 2
                Infectious diseases
                Viral diseases
                HIV
                Neurology
                Cerebrovascular diseases
                Parkinson disease
                Non-clinical medicine
                Health care providers
                Nurses
                Physicians
                Primary care
                Pulmonology
                Asthma

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article