12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Planning and licensing for marine aquaculture

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Marine aquaculture has the potential to increase its contribution to the global food system and provide valuable ecosystem services, but appropriate planning, licensing and regulation systems must be in place to enable sustainable development. At present, approaches vary considerably throughout the world, and several national and regional investigations have highlighted the need for reforms if marine aquaculture is to fulfil its potential. This article aims to map and evaluate the challenges of planning and licensing for growth of sustainable marine aquaculture. Despite the range of species, production systems and circumstances, this study found a number of common themes in the literature; complicated and fragmented approaches to planning and licensing, property rights and the licence to operate, competition for space and marine spatial planning, emerging species and diversifying marine aquaculture production (seaweed production, Integrated Multi‐Trophic Aquaculture [IMTA], nutrient and carbon offsetting with aquaculture, offshore aquaculture and co‐location and multiuse platforms), and the need to address knowledge gaps and use of decision‐support tools. Planning and licensing can be highly complicated, so the UK is used as a case study to show more detailed examples that highlight the range of challenges and uncertainty that industry, regulators and policymakers face across interacting jurisdictions. There are many complexities, but this study shows that many countries have undergone, or are undergoing, similar challenges, suggesting that lessons can be learned by sharing knowledge and experiences, even across different species and production systems, rather than having a more insular focus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references275

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

          Background Synthesis of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a systematic review can summarize the effects of individual outcomes and provide numerical answers about the effectiveness of interventions. Filtering of searches is time consuming, and no single method fulfills the principal requirements of speed with accuracy. Automation of systematic reviews is driven by a necessity to expedite the availability of current best evidence for policy and clinical decision-making. We developed Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org), a free web and mobile app, that helps expedite the initial screening of abstracts and titles using a process of semi-automation while incorporating a high level of usability. For the beta testing phase, we used two published Cochrane reviews in which included studies had been selected manually. Their searches, with 1030 records and 273 records, were uploaded to Rayyan. Different features of Rayyan were tested using these two reviews. We also conducted a survey of Rayyan’s users and collected feedback through a built-in feature. Results Pilot testing of Rayyan focused on usability, accuracy against manual methods, and the added value of the prediction feature. The “taster” review (273 records) allowed a quick overview of Rayyan for early comments on usability. The second review (1030 records) required several iterations to identify the previously identified 11 trials. The “suggestions” and “hints,” based on the “prediction model,” appeared as testing progressed beyond five included studies. Post rollout user experiences and a reflexive response by the developers enabled real-time modifications and improvements. The survey respondents reported 40% average time savings when using Rayyan compared to others tools, with 34% of the respondents reporting more than 50% time savings. In addition, around 75% of the respondents mentioned that screening and labeling studies as well as collaborating on reviews to be the two most important features of Rayyan. As of November 2016, Rayyan users exceed 2000 from over 60 countries conducting hundreds of reviews totaling more than 1.6M citations. Feedback from users, obtained mostly through the app web site and a recent survey, has highlighted the ease in exploration of searches, the time saved, and simplicity in sharing and comparing include-exclude decisions. The strongest features of the app, identified and reported in user feedback, were its ability to help in screening and collaboration as well as the time savings it affords to users. Conclusions Rayyan is responsive and intuitive in use with significant potential to lighten the load of reviewers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture

            The sustainability of aquaculture has been debated intensely since 2000, when a review on the net contribution of aquaculture to world fish supplies was published in Nature. This paper reviews the developments in global aquaculture from 1997 to 2017, incorporating all industry sub-sectors and highlighting the integration of aquaculture in the global food system. Inland aquaculture-especially in Asia-has contributed the most to global production volumes and food security. Major gains have also occurred in aquaculture feed efficiency and fish nutrition, lowering the fish-in-fish-out ratio for all fed species, although the dependence on marine ingredients persists and reliance on terrestrial ingredients has increased. The culture of both molluscs and seaweed is increasingly recognized for its ecosystem services; however, the quantification, valuation, and market development of these services remain rare. The potential for molluscs and seaweed to support global nutritional security is underexploited. Management of pathogens, parasites, and pests remains a sustainability challenge industry-wide, and the effects of climate change on aquaculture remain uncertain and difficult to validate. Pressure on the aquaculture industry to embrace comprehensive sustainability measures during this 20-year period have improved the governance, technology, siting, and management in many cases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The future of food from the sea

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lynne.falconer1@stir.ac.uk
                Journal
                Rev Aquac
                Rev Aquac
                10.1111/(ISSN)1753-5131
                RAQ
                Reviews in Aquaculture
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1753-5123
                1753-5131
                11 January 2023
                September 2023
                : 15
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/raq.v15.4 )
                : 1374-1404
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK
                [ 2 ] Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science Dorset UK
                [ 3 ] School of Ocean Science, Bangor University Wales UK
                [ 4 ] Nofima Tromsø Norway
                [ 5 ] Agri‐Food and Biosciences Institute Belfast UK
                [ 6 ] Marine Institute, Oranmore, Co. Galway Ireland
                [ 7 ] The Association for Coastal Ecosystem Services Lochend Cottage Dunbar UK
                [ 8 ] Scottish Association for Marine Science Oban UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Lynne Falconer, Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, FK9 4LA, UK.

                Email: lynne.falconer1@ 123456stir.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-1290
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8837
                Article
                RAQ12783
                10.1111/raq.12783
                10947445
                38505117
                72c7e908-ef7e-4742-b5f4-f2021521df03
                © 2023 The Authors. Reviews in Aquaculture published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 05 November 2022
                : 23 July 2022
                : 22 December 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 31, Words: 29702
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council , doi 10.13039/501100000268;
                Funded by: European Commission , doi 10.13039/501100000780;
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme , doi 10.13039/100010661;
                Award ID: GA 774426
                Award ID: GA 818173
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council , doi 10.13039/501100000270;
                Funded by: Norges Forskningsråd , doi 10.13039/501100005416;
                Award ID: 294799
                Categories
                Review
                Sena De Silva Paper
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:18.03.2024

                aquaculture planning,environmental management,licensing,regulation,sustainable development

                Comments

                Comment on this article