4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association Between Socioeconomic Status and In Utero Fetal Brain Development

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines the association between parental socioeconomic status measures and brain volume and cortical features among fetuses.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is parental socioeconomic status associated with fetal brain development?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 144 healthy pregnant women and their fetuses, low parental socioeconomic status was associated with decreased regional fetal brain tissue volume and increased brain gyrification.

          Meaning

          This cohort study found that parental socioeconomic status was associated with altered fetal brain morphology as measured by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques, which may serve as an early biomarker associated with childhood neurodevelopmental disorders.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Children raised in settings with lower parental socioeconomic status are at increased risk for neuropsychological disorders. However, to date, the association between socioeconomic status and fetal brain development remains poorly understood.

          Objective

          To determine the association between parental socioeconomic status and in vivo fetal brain growth and cerebral cortical development using advanced, 3-dimensional fetal magnetic resonance imaging.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study of fetal brain development enrolled 144 healthy pregnant women from 2 low-risk community obstetrical hospitals from 2012 through 2019 in the District of Columbia. Included women had a prenatal history without complications that included recommended screening laboratory and ultrasound studies. Exclusion criteria were multiple gestation pregnancy, known or suspected congenital infection, dysmorphic features of the fetus, and documented chromosomal abnormalities. T2-weighted fetal brain magnetic resonance images were acquired. Each pregnant woman was scanned at up to 2 points in the fetal period. Data were analyzed from June through November 2020.

          Exposures

          Parental education level and occupation status were documented.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Regional fetal brain tissue volume (for cortical gray matter, white matter, cerebellum, deep gray matter, and brainstem) and cerebral cortical features (ie, lobe volume, local gyrification index, and sulcal depth) in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes were calculated.

          Results

          Fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging studies were performed among 144 pregnant women (median [interquartile range] age, 32.5 [27.0-36.1] years) with gestational age from 24.0 to 39.4 weeks; 75 fetuses (52.1%) were male, and 69 fetuses (47.9%) were female. Higher parental education level was associated with significantly increased volume in the fetal white matter (mothers: β, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.26 to 4.45; P = .001; fathers: β, 2.39; 95% CI, 0.97 to 3.81; P = .001), deep gray matter (mothers: β, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.32; P = .048; fathers: β, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.31; P = .02), and brainstem (mothers: β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.10; P = .01; fathers: β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.004 to 0.08; P = .03). Higher maternal occupation status was associated with significantly increased volume in the fetal white matter (β, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.88 to 3.26; P = .001), cerebellum (β, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.29; P = .01), and brainstem (β, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.07; P = .04), and higher paternal occupation status was associated with significantly increased white matter volume (β, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.71 to 3.25; P < .01). However, higher socioeconomic status was associated with significantly decreased fetal cortical gray matter volume (mothers: β, −0.11; 95% CI, −0.18 to −0.03; P = .01; fathers: β, −0.10; 95% CI, −0.18 to −0.03; P = .01). Higher parental socioeconomic status was associated with increased volumes of 3 brain lobes of white matter: frontal lobe (mothers: β, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.13; P = .01; fathers: β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.11; P = .03), parietal lobe (mothers: β, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.11; P < .001; fathers: β, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.10; P = .001), and temporal lobe (mothers: β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P < .001; fathers: β, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; P < .001), and maternal SES score was associated with significantly decreased volume in the occipital lobe (β, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.04; P = .03). Higher parental socioeconomic status was associated with decreased cortical local gyrification index (for example, for the frontal lobe, mothers: β, −1.1; 95% CI, −1.9 to −0.3; P = .01; fathers: β, −0.8; 95% CI, −1.6 to −0.1; P = .03) and sulcal depth, except for the frontal lobe (for example, for the parietal lobe, mothers: β, −9.5; 95% CI, −13.8 to −5.3; P < .001; fathers: β, −8.7; 95% CI, −13.0 to −4.4; P < .001).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This cohort study found an association between parental socioeconomic status and altered in vivo fetal neurodevelopment. While being born and raised in a lower socioeconomic status setting is associated with poorer neuropsychological, educational, and socioeconomic outcomes in children, these findings suggest that altered prenatal programming may be associated with these outcomes and that future targeted prenatal interventions may be needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability.

          Active contour segmentation and its robust implementation using level set methods are well-established theoretical approaches that have been studied thoroughly in the image analysis literature. Despite the existence of these powerful segmentation methods, the needs of clinical research continue to be fulfilled, to a large extent, using slice-by-slice manual tracing. To bridge the gap between methodological advances and clinical routine, we developed an open source application called ITK-SNAP, which is intended to make level set segmentation easily accessible to a wide range of users, including those with little or no mathematical expertise. This paper describes the methods and software engineering philosophy behind this new tool and provides the results of validation experiments performed in the context of an ongoing child autism neuroimaging study. The validation establishes SNAP intrarater and interrater reliability and overlap error statistics for the caudate nucleus and finds that SNAP is a highly reliable and efficient alternative to manual tracing. Analogous results for lateral ventricle segmentation are provided.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression.

            Major depression occurs in 4.4% to 20% of the general population. Studies suggest that major depression is accompanied by immune dysregulation and activation of the inflammatory response system (IRS). Our objective was to quantitatively summarize the data on concentrations of specific cytokines in patients diagnosed with a major depressive episode and controls. We performed a meta-analysis of studies measuring cytokine concentration in patients with major depression, with a database search of the English literature (to August 2009) and a manual search of references. Twenty-four studies involving unstimulated measurements of cytokines in patients meeting DSM criteria for major depression were included in the meta-analysis; 13 for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, 9 for interleukin (IL)-1beta, 16 for IL-6, 5 for IL-4, 5 for IL-2, 4 for IL-8, 6 for IL-10, and 4 for interferon (IFN)-gamma. There were significantly higher concentrations of TNF-alpha (p < .00001), weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% confidence interval) 3.97 pg/mL (2.24 to 5.71), in depressed subjects compared with control subjects (438 depressed/350 nondepressed). Also, IL-6 concentrations were significantly higher (p < .00001) in depressed subjects compared with control subjects (492 depressed/400 nondepressed) with an overall WMD of 1.78 pg/mL (1.23 to 2.33). There were no significant differences among depressed and nondepressed subjects for the other cytokines studied. This meta-analysis reports significantly higher concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-6 in depressed subjects compared with control subjects. While both positive and negative results have been reported in individual studies, this meta-analytic result strengthens evidence that depression is accompanied by activation of the IRS. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mediation analysis.

              Mediating variables are prominent in psychological theory and research. A mediating variable transmits the effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable. Differences between mediating variables and confounders, moderators, and covariates are outlined. Statistical methods to assess mediation and modern comprehensive approaches are described. Future directions for mediation analysis are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                29 March 2021
                March 2021
                29 March 2021
                : 4
                : 3
                : e213526
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Developing Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
                [2 ]Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
                [3 ]Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
                [4 ]Prenatal Pediatrics Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: February 5, 2021.
                Published: March 29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3526
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Lu Y-C et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Catherine Limperopoulos, PhD, Developing Brain Institute, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010 ( climpero@ 123456childrensnational.org ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Lu had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Lu, Quistorff, Andescavage, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Lu, Kapse, Limperopoulos.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
                Statistical analysis: Lu, Cheng, Limperopoulos.
                Obtained funding: Limperopoulos.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Lu, Kapse, Quistorff, Lopez, Fry, Andescavage, Espinosa, Limperopoulos.
                Supervision: Lu, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This study was funded by grant No. NHLBI R01 HL116585-01 from the National Institutes of Health.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi210130
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3526
                8008281
                33779746
                72c71d2a-c073-4005-8086-78d77a877ed1
                Copyright 2021 Lu Y-C et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 20 November 2020
                : 5 February 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article