0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RAD140 (Testolone) negatively impacts skeletal muscle adaptation, frailty status and mortality risk in female mice

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RAD140 is a selective androgen receptor modulator that produces anabolic effects within skeletal muscle. Thus, RAD140 may be effective at treating sarcopenia. No long‐term studies have investigated how RAD140 influences strength in ageing muscle. This study aimed to determine how 10 weeks of RAD140 supplementation impacts strength, recovery from exercise, and overall health in ageing mice. Young and adult females were assigned to receive RAD140 (5 mg/kg) or a control solution. Dorsiflexor muscles were exposed to repeated bouts of eccentric contractions, and torque was measured before and after each bout. Adaptive potential and strength gains were calculated to assess the efficacy of RAD140 in muscle, while frailty status and mortality risk were used to measure health span. Supplementation of RAD140 increased frailty status and mortality risk in the young and adult treated groups compared to the controls ( p ≤ 0.042). RAD140 decreased adaptive potential in young ( p = 0.040) but not adult mice ( p = 0.688). Torque did not differ between groups after 2–3 weeks of recovery ( p ≥ 0.135). In conclusion, long‐term RAD140 supplementation reduced indices of overall health and failed to improve strength in female mice, suggesting that RAD140 (at a 5mg/kg dosage) may be more detrimental than beneficial in delaying or preventing sarcopenia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Resistance Training for Older Adults

          Fragala, MS, Cadore, EL, Dorgo, S, Izquierdo, M, Kraemer, WJ, Peterson, MD, and Ryan, ED. Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the national strength and conditioning association. J Strength Cond Res 33(8): 2019-2052, 2019-Aging, even in the absence of chronic disease, is associated with a variety of biological changes that can contribute to decreases in skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. Such losses decrease physiologic resilience and increase vulnerability to catastrophic events. As such, strategies for both prevention and treatment are necessary for the health and well-being of older adults. The purpose of this Position Statement is to provide an overview of the current and relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for resistance training for older adults. As presented in this Position Statement, current research has demonstrated that countering muscle disuse through resistance training is a powerful intervention to combat the loss of muscle strength and muscle mass, physiological vulnerability, and their debilitating consequences on physical functioning, mobility, independence, chronic disease management, psychological well-being, quality of life, and healthy life expectancy. This Position Statement provides evidence to support recommendations for successful resistance training in older adults related to 4 parts: (a) program design variables, (b) physiological adaptations, (c) functional benefits, and (d) considerations for frailty, sarcopenia, and other chronic conditions. The goal of this Position Statement is to a) help foster a more unified and holistic approach to resistance training for older adults, b) promote the health and functional benefits of resistance training for older adults, and c) prevent or minimize fears and other barriers to implementation of resistance training programs for older adults.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Androgen Receptor Structure, Function and Biology: From Bench to Bedside.

            The actions of androgens such as testosterone and dihydrotestosterone are mediated via the androgen receptor (AR), a ligand-dependent nuclear transcription factor and member of the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family. Given its widespread expression in many cells and tissues, the AR has a diverse range of biological actions including important roles in the development and maintenance of the reproductive, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, immune, neural and haemopoietic systems. AR signalling may also be involved in the development of tumours in the prostate, bladder, liver, kidney and lung. Androgens can exert their actions via the AR in a DNA binding-dependent manner to regulate target gene transcription, or in a non-DNA binding-dependent manner to initiate rapid, cellular events such as the phosphorylation of 2(nd) messenger signalling cascades. More recently, ligand-independent actions of the AR have also been identified. Given the large volume of studies relating to androgens and the AR, this review is not intended as an extensive review of all studies investigating the AR, but rather as an overview of the structure, function, signalling pathways and biology of the AR as well as its important role in clinical medicine, with emphasis on recent developments in this field.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy of 3 days/wk resistance training on myofiber hypertrophy and myogenic mechanisms in young vs. older adults.

              Resistance training (RT) has shown the most promise in reducing/reversing effects of sarcopenia, although the optimum regime specific for older adults remains unclear. We hypothesized myofiber hypertrophy resulting from frequent (3 days/wk, 16 wk) RT would be impaired in older (O; 60-75 yr; 12 women, 13 men), sarcopenic adults compared with young (Y; 20-35 yr; 11 women, 13 men) due to slowed repair/regeneration processes. Myofiber-type distribution and cross-sectional area (CSA) were determined at 0 and 16 wk. Transcript and protein levels of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) were assessed as markers of regeneration at 0 and 24 h postexercise, and after 16 wk. Only Y increased type I CSA 18% (P < 0.001). O showed smaller type IIa (-16%) and type IIx (-24%) myofibers before training (P < 0.05), with differences most notable in women. Both age groups increased type IIa (O, 16%; Y, 25%) and mean type II (O, 23%; Y, 32%) size (P < 0.05). Growth was generally most favorable in young men. Percent change scores on fiber size revealed an age x gender interaction for type I fibers (P < 0.05) as growth among Y (25%) exceeded that of O (4%) men. Myogenin and myogenic differentiation factor D (MyoD) mRNAs increased (P < 0.05) in Y and O, whereas myogenic factor (myf)-5 mRNA increased in Y only (P < 0.05). Myf-6 protein increased (P < 0.05) in both Y and O. The results generally support our hypothesis as 3 days/wk training led to more robust hypertrophy in Y vs. O, particularly among men. However, this differential hypertrophy adaptation was not explained by age variation in MRF expression.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
                Clin Exp Pharma Physio
                Wiley
                0305-1870
                1440-1681
                December 2023
                September 27 2023
                December 2023
                : 50
                : 12
                : 973-983
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Honors Tutorial College Ohio University Athens Ohio USA
                [2 ] Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI) Ohio University Athens Ohio USA
                [3 ] Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine Ohio University Athens Ohio USA
                Article
                10.1111/1440-1681.13824
                37758180
                72b8ab4a-7fb2-4b64-9deb-930f6039331f
                © 2023

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article