3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Young

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence Supporting the Existence of a Distinct Obese Phenotype of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

          Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome. Phenotyping patients into pathophysiologically homogeneous groups may enable better targeting of treatment. Obesity is common in HFpEF and has many cardiovascular effects, suggesting that it may be a viable candidate for phenotyping. We compared cardiovascular structure, function, and reserve capacity in subjects with obese HFpEF, those with nonobese HFpEF, and control subjects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phenotype-Specific Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multiorgan Roadmap.

            Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF; HFpEF) accounts for 50% of HF cases, and its prevalence relative to HF with reduced EF continues to rise. In contrast to HF with reduced EF, large trials testing neurohumoral inhibition in HFpEF failed to reach a positive outcome. This failure was recently attributed to distinct systemic and myocardial signaling in HFpEF and to diversity of HFpEF phenotypes. In this review, an HFpEF treatment strategy is proposed that addresses HFpEF-specific signaling and phenotypic diversity. In HFpEF, extracardiac comorbidities such as metabolic risk, arterial hypertension, and renal insufficiency drive left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction through systemic inflammation and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction. The latter affects left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through macrophage infiltration, resulting in interstitial fibrosis, and through altered paracrine signaling to cardiomyocytes, which become hypertrophied and stiff because of low nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Systemic inflammation also affects other organs such as lungs, skeletal muscle, and kidneys, leading, respectively, to pulmonary hypertension, muscle weakness, and sodium retention. Individual steps of these signaling cascades can be targeted by specific interventions: metabolic risk by caloric restriction, systemic inflammation by statins, pulmonary hypertension by phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, muscle weakness by exercise training, sodium retention by diuretics and monitoring devices, myocardial nitric oxide bioavailability by inorganic nitrate-nitrite, myocardial cyclic guanosine monophosphate content by neprilysin or phosphodiesterase 9 inhibition, and myocardial fibrosis by spironolactone. Because of phenotypic diversity in HFpEF, personalized therapeutic strategies are proposed, which are configured in a matrix with HFpEF presentations in the abscissa and HFpEF predispositions in the ordinate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mortality associated with heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a prospective international multi-ethnic cohort study

              Whether prevalence and mortality of patients with heart failure with preserved or mid-range (40-49%) ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFmREF) are similar to those of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), as reported in some epidemiologic studies, remains highly controversial. We determined and compared characteristics and outcomes for patients with HFpEF, HFmREF, and HFrEF in a prospective, international, multi-ethnic population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation
                Circulation
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                December 11 2018
                December 11 2018
                : 138
                : 24
                : 2763-2773
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, the Netherlands (J.T., C.S.P.L.).
                [2 ]National Heart Centre Singapore (J.T., W.T.T., T.-H.K.T., J.Y., C.S.P.L.).
                [3 ]Duke-National University Singapore Medical School (J.T., C.S.P.L.).
                [4 ]Changi General Hospital, Singapore (M.M.).
                [5 ]School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth (T.-H.K.T.).
                [6 ]Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (C.-L.H.).
                [7 ]Care Hospital, Hyderabad, India (C.N.).
                [8 ]Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan (W.S.).
                [9 ]National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Centre, Osaka, Japan (W.S.).
                [10 ]Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore and Cardiac Department, National University Health System (L.H.L., T.P.N.).
                [11 ]Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences and School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.).
                [12 ]Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (M.R.Z.).
                [13 ]Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC (M.R.Z.).
                [14 ]National University Heart Centre, Singapore (A.M.R., C.S.P.L.).
                [15 ]Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago, New Zealand (A.M.R.).
                [16 ]Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN (I.S.A.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034720
                30565987
                72a66eef-2419-4777-8dd2-39c45e4af8e5
                © 2018
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article