18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dust-bathing behavior of laying hens in enriched colony housing systems and an aviary system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The dust-bathing behavior of Lohmann Selected Leghorn hens was compared in 4 enriched colony housing systems and in an aviary system. The enriched colony housing systems differed especially in the alignment and division of the functional areas dust bath, nest, and perches. Forty-eight-hour video recordings were performed at 3 time-points during the laying period, and focal animal sampling and behavior sampling methods were used to analyze the dust-bathing behavior. Focal animal data included the relative fractions of dust-bathing hens overall, of hens bathing in the dust-bath area, and of those bathing on the wire floor throughout the day. Behavior data included the number of dust-bathing bouts within a predefined time range, the duration of 1 bout, the number of and reasons for interruptions, and the number of and reasons for the termination of dust-bathing bouts. Results showed that the average duration of dust bathing varied between the 4 enriched colony housing systems compared with the aviary system. The duration of dust-bathing bouts was shorter than reported under natural conditions. A positive correlation between dust-bathing activity and size of the dust-bath area was observed. Frequently, dust baths were interrupted and terminated by disturbing influences such as pecking by other hens. This was especially observed in the enriched colony housing systems. In none of the observed systems, neither in the enriched colony housing nor in the aviary system, were all of the observed dust baths terminated “normally.” Dust bathing behavior on the wire mesh rather than in the provided dust-bath area generally was observed at different frequencies in all enriched colony housing systems during all observation periods, but never in the aviary system. The size and design of the dust-bath area influenced the prevalence of dust-bathing behavior in that small and subdivided dust-bath areas reduced the number of dust-bathing bouts but increased the incidence of sham dust bathing on the wire mesh.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing in laying hens.

          The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing was studied in small groups of laying hens. The birds were reared and kept for 2.5 years in cages with either sand ("sand birds") or wire floors ("wire birds"), and subsequently deprived of sand (sand birds) or given access to sand (wire birds). Before this change, wire birds had a higher incidence of unilateral wing/leg stretching and stereotypic pecking compared to sand birds; however, there was no difference in corticosterone concentrations. Deprivation of sand in the sand birds resulted in a total absence of dustbathing and in a significant increase in corticosterone concentrations. Although the wire birds dustbathed on the wire before the change of floors, there was a significant increase in the incidence of dustbathing after sand was provided, but no changes in the concentrations of corticosterone. Threats and allopecks decreased in the wire birds after access to sand, whereas no changes were found in the sand birds. Stereotypic pecks on feathers were absent in the sand birds, but were frequent in most of the wire birds both before and after they were given sand. Also, in the wire birds, all feather pecking (stereotypic and nonstereotypic) was positively correlated with the concentration of corticosterone, and this kind of pecking may, thus, be an expression of stress in laying hens. We conclude that the nonperformance of dustbathing behavior is associated with the experience of stress.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Dustbathing behavior of laying hens as related to quality of dustbathing material

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Behaviour, health and integument of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages.

              1. In 2 trials the health and behaviour of a total of 3552 caged laying hens of 4 hybrids, Dekalb XL, Lohmann Selected Leghorn (LSL) and Shaver 288 in trial 1 and ISA Brown and LSL in trial 2, were studied. The cage designs were Get-away cages (GA) with 15 hens per cage, a special version of the 'Edinburgh modified cage' called 'Modified and enriched cage' (ME) with 4 ISA or 5 Leghorn hens per cage, conventional metal cages with 4 hens per cage without (CO) and with a perch (PC) and conventional plastic cages (PL) with three hens per cage. GA and ME included nests, perches and sandbaths. 2. In the first trial f1p4nest models were used, artificial turf and welded wire floor. In the second trial both nest models were used in GA, while all nests in ME were equipped with artificial turf. In the second trial there were 4 sandbath treatments in ME; no sandbath, sandbath (25 x 50 cm) first opened at 16 weeks of age, sandbath first opened at 26 weeks and double size sandbath (50 x 50 cm) first opened at 16 weeks. Hens in GA were allowed access to the sandbaths from 26 weeks. 3. At 35 and 55 weeks the best plumage condition (feather cover) was found in PL and GA but plumage condition in ME was not significantly inferior than in GA. Hens in GA had the dirtiest plumage and most bumble foot but no toe pad hyperkeratosis. Some toe pad hyperkeratosis occurred in the other systems. Most keel bone lesions were found in systems with perches. The highest mortality was registered in GA. Hens in systems with perches, sandbaths and nests had increased strength of humerus at slaughter. 4. More eggs were laid in nests with artificial turf than in welded wire floor nests. LSL hens laid larger proportions of eggs in the nests (94% and 92% in the two trials) than the other hybrids. Less than 1% of the eggs in ME and 2% in GA were laid in the sandbaths. 5. The use of perches in ME and PC was approximately 30% in the day time. At night the use was 93% in ME and 89% in PC in trial 1 and 96% in ME and 81% in PC in trial 2. 6. Hens in ME with the double sized sandbath both visited the sandbath and performed dust bathing behaviour most, followed by hens in GA, hens in ME with access to the bath from 16 weeks and last, hens in ME with access to the bath from 26 weeks. 7. It is concluded that enrichments of laying cages are used by the hens to a large extent if properly constructed and managed, implying an increased behavioural repertoire of the hens compared with conventional cages. With perches at only one level and with smaller groups of birds, ME provided better hygiene and inspection properties than GA.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Poult Sci
                Poult. Sci
                ps
                poultrysci
                Poultry Science
                Poultry Science Association, Inc.
                0032-5791
                1525-3171
                03 April 2016
                July 2016
                03 April 2016
                : 95
                : 7
                : 1482-1491
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Veterinary Sciences, Chair of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany
                []Department of Veterinary Sciences, Chair of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: h.louton@ 123456lmu.de
                Article
                10.3382/ps/pew109
                4957303
                27044875
                724bedfc-d305-4d89-9905-eaa8f66b5939
                © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com .

                History
                : 17 February 2016
                : 27 August 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 10
                Categories
                Animal Well-Being and Behavior
                Custom metadata
                July 2016

                dust-bathing behavior,laying hen,sham dust bathing
                dust-bathing behavior, laying hen, sham dust bathing

                Comments

                Comment on this article