10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Laying hens in aviaries with different litter substrates: Behavior across the flock cycle and feather lipid content

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The tiered aviary for laying hens includes a floor litter area to promote foraging and dust bathing. Data are needed on hens’ use of different litter substrates and effectiveness of substrates in removing excess feather lipids to ensure a suitable litter area. Bovans White hens were housed in commercial-style aviaries with access to one of 3 litter substrates (wood shavings, straw, or plastic turf mats—AstroTurf ®, n = 4 aviary pens per substrate, 144 cage-reared hens populated per pen). Litter areas were videoed across 2 d each at 4 ages: immediately following first aviary opening (25 wk), then at 28, 50, and 68 weeks. Observations of hens throughout the d included percentages of all hens in each pen on the litter area, foraging and transitioning between the tiered enclosure and litter area. Percentages of hens dust bathing were observed from 11:00 to 15:00. Breast and back feather samples from 7 birds per pen at 28, 50, and 68 wk were analyzed for lipid content. Overall, fewer hens simultaneously accessed the AstroTurf ® ( P < 0.0001), but flocks showed relatively balanced transitions between the tiered enclosure and the litter area throughout the d, regardless of substrate. On average, less than 5% of all hens were observed dust bathing (peaks up to 15% of hens) with no differences among litter substrates or ages ( P ≥ 0.18). On average, less than 2% of hens were observed foraging (peaks up to 4% of hens) with fewer hens foraging on AstroTurf ® ( P < 0.0001). Feather lipid differences among litter substrates ( P < 0.0001) were inconsistent across sampling periods, possibly due to different birds sampled across time. At all ages, lipid levels were higher on the back over breast feathers ( P < 0.0001) for hens housed with AstroTurf ®. AstroTurf ® may be suitable for nest boxes, but straw and shavings are more ideal litter substrates. Further study should investigate alternative substrates or regular substrate addition to encourage more foraging and dust bathing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens

          Laying hens may face a number of welfare problems including: acute and chronic pain caused by beak trimming; exaggerated fearfulness that may cause stress and suffocation; difficulties in locating resources, resulting potentially in emaciation and dehydration; frustration and boredom, caused by an environment that is barren; feather pecking; cannibalism; foot lesions; and bone fractures. In Europe, a greater proportion of laying hens are housed in non-cage systems compared to the rest of the world. The extent of the different welfare problems may therefore vary between countries as the type of housing system influences the risk of suffering. More generally, many of these welfare problems are influenced by the rearing environment of the pullets. This article therefore focuses on welfare problems in laying hens that can be traced back to rearing. Factors that have been studied in relation to their effects on bird welfare include beak trimming, housing type, furnishing, enrichment, feeding, stocking density, flock size, sound and light levels, concentration of gasses, age at transfer from rearing to production facilities, similarity between rearing and production facilities, competence of staff, and interactions between bird strain and environment. The present review aims to summarize rearing-related risk factors of poor welfare in adult laying hens housed according to European Union legislation. It aims to identify gaps in current knowledge, and suggests strategies for improving bird welfare by improving rearing conditions. Two main conclusions of this work are that attempts should be made to use appropriate genetic material and that beak trimming should be limited where possible. In addition to this, the rearing system should provide constant access to appropriate substrates, perches, and mashed feed, and should be as similar as possible to the housing system used for the adult birds. Finally, young birds (pullets) should be moved to the production facilities before 16 weeks of age. The measures outlined in this review may be useful for improving the welfare of pullets and adult laying hens.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Feather-pecking in poultry: Its relation with ground-pecking

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of Resource Allocation on Behavioural Strategies: A Comparison of Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and Two Domesticated Breeds of Poultry

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Poult Sci
                Poult. Sci
                ps
                Poultry Science
                Oxford University Press
                0032-5791
                1525-3171
                November 2017
                28 July 2017
                28 July 2017
                : 96
                : 11
                : 3824-3835
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824
                []School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, and CSIRO, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
                []Animal Behavior and Management, Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
                [§ ]Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: dana.campbell@ 123456csiro.au
                Article
                pex204
                10.3382/ps/pex204
                5850108
                29050413
                43bf56e1-df37-417a-88e7-ee5c0bcc3e73
                © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

                History
                : 15 June 2017
                : 13 January 2017
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Animal Well-Being and Behavior

                cage-reared,laying hen,dust bathing,litter,lipids,foraging
                cage-reared, laying hen, dust bathing, litter, lipids, foraging

                Comments

                Comment on this article