4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prolonged occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament to reduce risk of bleeding and tumor spread during recipient hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Backgrounds/Aims

          Prevention of excessive bleeding during liver transplantation (LT) operations presents a major challenge. Compared to deceased donor LT, living donor LT (LDLT) is more vulnerable to bleeding because of additional dissection procedures. We herein introduce our technique for prolonged occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament applied to recipient hepatectomy for LDLT.

          Methods

          Simulated assessment of splanchnic hemodynamics on prolonged occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament showed that patients with cirrhotic liver appeared to tolerate the procedure as like in the patients with normal liver. We accumulated experience on the prolonged Pringle maneuver with curved intestinal clamps.

          Results

          This technique was applied to more than 60 cases of adult LDLT operations from early 2014 until the end of 2018. Initially, application of this technique was limited to patients showing heavy bleeding during perihilar mobilization. Thereafter, this technique was applied at the start of liver mobilization and stopped after complete mobilization of the retro-hepatic vena cava. Recently, this technique was also applied during dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament. The mean total occlusion duration was 67±13 minutes. No patient suffered from major serosal peritoneal tearing-associated bleeding or hepatic artery problems. Intentional prolonged occlusion over two hours was applied to five patients who had advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

          Conclusions

          We believe that prolonged occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament is a simple effective method to reduce intraoperative bleeding, and that it has potential benefit to reduce the risk of intraoperative tumor spread during LDLT operations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          V. Notes on the Arrest of Hepatic Hemorrhage Due to Trauma.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Lessons learned from 1,000 living donor liver transplantations in a single center: how to make living donations safe.

            Serious complications have occurred in a considerable proportion of living donors of liver transplants, but data from a single high-volume center has rarely been available. We analyzed the medical records of donors and recipients of the first 1,000 living donor liver transplants, performed at Asan Medical Center from December 1994 to June 2005, with a focus on donor safety. There were 107 pediatric and 893 adult transplants. The most common diagnoses were biliary atresia in pediatric recipients (63%) and hepatitis B-associated liver cirrhosis (80%) in adult recipients. Right lobe donors were strictly selected based on liver resection rate and steatosis. From 1,162 living donors, 588 right lobes, 6 extended right lobes, 7 right posterior segments, 464 left lobes, and 107 left lateral segments were obtained. Of these, 837 grafts were implanted singly, whereas 325, along with 1 cadaveric split graft, were implanted as dual grafts into 163 recipients. The 5-yr survival rates were 84.8% in pediatric recipients and 83.2% in adult recipients. There was no donor mortality, but 3.2% of donors experienced major complications. Until the end of 2001, the major donor complication rate was 6.7%, with most occurring in right liver donors. Since 2002, liver resection exceeding 65% of whole liver volume were avoided except for young donors with no hepatic steatosis, and the donor complication rate has been reduced to 1.3%. In conclusion, a majority of major living donor complications appear to be avoidable through the strict selection of living donor and graft type, intensive postoperative surveillance, and timely feedback of surgical techniques. Selection of right lobe graft should be very prudently considered if the donor right liver appears to be larger than 65% of the whole liver volume.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled study.

              To evaluate whether major right hepatectomy using the anterior approach technique for large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) results in better operative and long-term survival outcomes when compared with the conventional approach technique. The anterior approach technique has been advocated recently for large right liver tumors. However, its beneficial effects on the operative and survival outcomes of the patients have not been evaluated prospectively. A prospective randomized controlled study was performed on 120 patients who had large (> or =5 cm) right liver HCC and underwent curative major right hepatic resection during a 57-month period. The patients were randomized to undergo resection of the tumor using the anterior approach technique (AA group, n = 60) or the conventional approach technique (CA group, n = 60). The anterior approach technique involved initial vascular inflow control, completion of parenchymal transection, and complete venous outflow control before the right liver was mobilized. Operative and long-term survival outcomes of the two groups were analyzed. Quantitative assessments of markers of circulating tumor cells at various stages of surgery of the two techniques were also assessed by plasma albumin-mRNA. The overall operative blood loss, morbidity, and duration of hospital stay were comparable in both groups. Major operative blood loss of > or =2 L occurred less frequently in the AA group (8.3% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.005). As a result, blood transfusion requirement and number of patients requiring blood transfusion were significantly lower in the AA group. Hospital mortality occurred in 1 patient in the AA group and 6 patients in the CA group (P = 0.114). Median disease-free survival was 15.5 months in the AA group and 13.9 months in the CA group (P = 0.882). Overall survival was significantly better in the AA group (median >68.1 months) than in the CA group (median = 22.6 months, P = 0.006). The survival benefit appeared more obvious in patients with stage II disease and patients with lymphovascular permeation of the tumor. The anterior approach was also found to associate with significantly lower plasma albumin-mRNA levels at various stages of surgery compared with the CA technique. On multivariate analysis, tumor staging, anterior approach hepatic resection, and resection margin involved by the tumor were independent factors affecting overall survival. The anterior approach results in better operative and survival outcomes compared with the conventional approach. It is the preferred technique for major right hepatic resection for large HCC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg
                Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg
                AHBPS
                Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
                Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
                2508-5778
                2508-5859
                February 2019
                28 February 2019
                : 23
                : 1
                : 61-64
                Affiliations
                Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Shin Hwang. Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3930, Fax: +82-2-3010-6701, shwang@ 123456amc.seoul.kr
                Article
                10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.1.61
                6405371
                718a0b91-a500-4fe1-ab52-ea04cd91eea2
                Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 December 2018
                : 30 December 2018
                : 10 January 2019
                Categories
                How-I-Do-It

                living donor liver transplantation,bleeding,pringle maneuver,portal hypertension

                Comments

                Comment on this article