549
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea.

      Statistics in Medicine
      Age Factors, Albumins, analysis, Antimetabolites, pharmacology, Azathioprine, Bilirubin, Cholestasis, drug therapy, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, methods, Regression Analysis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In medical research, continuous variables are often converted into categorical variables by grouping values into two or more categories. We consider in detail issues pertaining to creating just two groups, a common approach in clinical research. We argue that the simplicity achieved is gained at a cost; dichotomization may create rather than avoid problems, notably a considerable loss of power and residual confounding. In addition, the use of a data-derived 'optimal' cutpoint leads to serious bias. We illustrate the impact of dichotomization of continuous predictor variables using as a detailed case study a randomized trial in primary biliary cirrhosis. Dichotomization of continuous data is unnecessary for statistical analysis and in particular should not be applied to explanatory variables in regression models. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article