7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A pragmatic evidence-based approach to post-mortem perinatal imaging

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Post-mortem imaging has a high acceptance rate amongst parents and healthcare professionals as a non-invasive method for investigating perinatal deaths. Previously viewed as a ‘niche’ subspecialty, it is becoming increasingly requested, with general radiologists now more frequently asked to oversee and advise on appropriate imaging protocols. Much of the current literature to date has focussed on diagnostic accuracy and clinical experiences of individual centres and their imaging techniques (e.g. post-mortem CT, MRI, ultrasound and micro-CT), and pragmatic, evidence-based guidance for how to approach such referrals in real-world practice is lacking. In this review, we summarise the latest research and provide an approach and flowchart to aid decision-making for perinatal post-mortem imaging. We highlight key aspects of the maternal and antenatal history that radiologists should consider when protocolling studies (e.g. antenatal imaging findings and history), and emphasise important factors that could impact the diagnostic quality of post-mortem imaging examinations (e.g. post-mortem weight and time interval). Considerations regarding when ancillary post-mortem image-guided biopsy tests are beneficial are also addressed, and we provide key references for imaging protocols for a variety of cross-sectional imaging modalities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Concentration-dependent specimen shrinkage in iodine-enhanced microCT.

          Iodine potassium iodide (I2 KI) solution can be employed as a contrast agent for the visualisation of soft tissue structures in micro-computed tomography studies. This technique provides high resolution images of soft tissue non-destructively but initial studies suggest that the stain can cause substantial specimen shrinkage. The degree of specimen shrinkage, and potential deformation, is an important consideration when using the data for morphological studies. Here we quantify the macroscopic volume changes in mouse skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle and cerebellum as a result of immersion in the common fixatives 10% phosphate-buffered formal saline, 70% ethanol and 3% glutaraldehyde, compared with I2 KI staining solution at concentrations of 2, 6, 10 and 20%. Immersion in the I2 KI solution resulted in dramatic changes of tissue volume, which were far larger than the shrinkage from formalin fixation alone. The degree of macroscopic change was most dependent upon the I2 KI concentration, with severe shrinkage of 70% seen in solutions of 20% I2 KI after 14 days' incubation. When using this technique care needs to be taken to use the lowest concentration that will give adequate contrast to minimise artefacts due to shrinkage. © 2013 Anatomical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study.

            Post-mortem MRI is a potential diagnostic alternative to conventional autopsy, but few large prospective studies have compared its accuracy with that of conventional autopsy. We assessed the accuracy of whole-body, post-mortem MRI for detection of major pathological lesions associated with death in a prospective cohort of fetuses and children. In this prospective validation study, we did pre-autopsy, post-mortem, whole-body MRI at 1·5 T in an unselected population of fetuses (≤24 weeks' or >24 weeks' gestation) and children (aged <16 years) at two UK centres in London between March 1, 2007 and Sept 30, 2011. With conventional autopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, we assessed MRI findings alone, or in conjunction with other minimally invasive post-mortem investigations (minimally invasive autopsy), for accuracy in detection of cause of death or major pathological abnormalities. A radiologist and pathologist who were masked to the autopsy findings indicated whether the minimally invasive autopsy would have been adequate. The primary outcome was concordance rate between minimally invasive and conventional autopsy. We analysed 400 cases, of which 277 (69%) were fetuses and 123 (31%) were children. Cause of death or major pathological lesion detected by minimally invasive autopsy was concordant with conventional autopsy in 357 (89·3%, 95% CI 85·8-91·9) cases: 175 (94·6%, 90·3-97·0) of 185 fetuses at 24 weeks' gestation or less, 88 (95·7%, 89·3-98·3) of 92 fetuses at more than 24 weeks' gestation, 34 (81·0%, 66·7-90·0) [corrected] of 42 newborns aged 1 month or younger, 45 (84·9%, 72·9-92·1) of 53 infants aged older than 1 month to 1 year or younger, and 15 (53·6%, 35·8-70·5) of 28 children aged older than 1 year to 16 years or younger. The dedicated radiologist or pathologist review of the minimally invasive autopsy showed that in 165 (41%) cases a full autopsy might not have been needed; in these cases, concordance between autopsy and minimally invasive autopsy was 99·4% (96·6-99·9). Minimally invasive autopsy has accuracy similar to that of conventional autopsy for detection of cause of death or major pathological abnormality after death in fetuses, newborns, and infants, but was less accurate in older children. If undertaken jointly by pathologists and radiologists, minimally invasive autopsy could be an acceptable alternative to conventional autopsy in selected cases. Policy research Programme, Department of Health, UK. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting

              Background Postmortem examination is the single most useful investigation in providing information to parents about why their baby or child died. Despite this, uptake remains well below the recommended 75%. Objective To address the question ‘what are the barriers and motivators to perinatal, prenatal and paediatric PM examination?’ Search strategy Key databases including Pubmed and CINAHL; Cochrane library, websites of relevant patient organisations, hand search of key journals, first and last authors and references. Selection criteria Peer‐reviewed qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research examining factors affecting uptake or decline of perinatal or paediatric postmortem examination. Data collection and analysis Narrative synthesis; findings were compared across studies to examine interrelations. Main results Seven major themes describing barriers to postmortem uptake were identified: dislike of invasiveness, practicalities of the procedure, organ retention issues, protective parenting, communication and understanding, religion and culture and professional or organisational barriers. Six major themes related to factors which facilitated parental consent were identified: desire for information, contributing to research, coping and well‐being, respectful care, minimally invasive options, and policy and practice. There were a number of themes in the literature that reflected best practice. Conclusion Findings highlight the need for better health professional education and the fact some concerns may be mitigated if less invasive methods of postmortem were routinely available. New consent packages and codes of practice may have a positive impact on perception of examination after death. The landscape is changing; further research is necessary to assess the impact on postmortem uptake rates. Tweetable abstract Systematic review to explore the barriers and motivators to perinatal, prenatal and paediatric postmortem examination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                susan.shelmerdine@gosh.nhs.uk
                Journal
                Insights Imaging
                Insights Imaging
                Insights into Imaging
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1869-4101
                15 July 2021
                15 July 2021
                December 2021
                : 12
                : 101
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.424537.3, ISNI 0000 0004 5902 9895, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, ; London, WC1N 3JH UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, ; London, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.420468.c, Great Ormond Street Hospital NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Population, Policy and Practice Department, , UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, ; London, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.420468.c, North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, , Great Ormond Street Hospital, ; London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-9967
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-1521
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-3516
                Article
                1042
                10.1186/s13244-021-01042-1
                8282801
                34264420
                70214da5-dfba-4917-8ba1-7cbce6eb0cf4
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 April 2021
                : 24 June 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research;
                Award ID: ICA-CDRF-2017-03-53
                Award ID: NIHR-300099
                Award ID: NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001279, Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity;
                Categories
                Critical Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Radiology & Imaging
                radiology,autopsy,diagnostic imaging,foetus,pregnancy loss
                Radiology & Imaging
                radiology, autopsy, diagnostic imaging, foetus, pregnancy loss

                Comments

                Comment on this article