3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Extinctions of interactions: quantifying a dung beetle–mammal network

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 5
      Ecosphere
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host-parasitoid food webs.

          Global conversion of natural habitats to agriculture has led to marked changes in species diversity and composition. However, it is less clear how habitat modification affects interactions among species. Networks of feeding interactions (food webs) describe the underlying structure of ecological communities, and might be crucially linked to their stability and function. Here, we analyse 48 quantitative food webs for cavity-nesting bees, wasps and their parasitoids across five tropical habitat types. We found marked changes in food-web structure across the modification gradient, despite little variation in species richness. The evenness of interaction frequencies declined with habitat modification, with most energy flowing along one or a few pathways in intensively managed agricultural habitats. In modified habitats there was a higher ratio of parasitoid to host species and increased parasitism rates, with implications for the important ecosystem services, such as pollination and biological control, that are performed by host bees and wasps. The most abundant parasitoid species was more specialized in modified habitats, with reduced attack rates on alternative hosts. Conventional community descriptors failed to discriminate adequately among habitats, indicating that perturbation of the structure and function of ecological communities might be overlooked in studies that do not document and quantify species interactions. Altered interaction structure therefore represents an insidious and functionally important hidden effect of habitat modification by humans.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conservation of species interaction networks

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Species coextinctions and the biodiversity crisis.

              To assess the coextinction of species (the loss of a species upon the loss of another), we present a probabilistic model, scaled with empirical data. The model examines the relationship between coextinction levels (proportion of species extinct) of affiliates and their hosts across a wide range of coevolved interspecific systems: pollinating Ficus wasps and Ficus, parasites and their hosts, butterflies and their larval host plants, and ant butterflies and their host ants. Applying a nomographic method based on mean host specificity (number of host species per affiliate species), we estimate that 6300 affiliate species are "coendangered" with host species currently listed as endangered. Current extinction estimates need to be recalibrated by taking species coextinctions into account.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ecosphere
                Ecosphere
                Wiley
                2150-8925
                2150-8925
                November 26 2018
                November 2018
                November 15 2018
                November 2018
                : 9
                : 11
                : e02491
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3PS UK
                [2 ]Embrapa Florestas P.O. Box 319 Colombo 83411‐970 PR Brazil
                [3 ]Marwell Wildlife Colden Common Winchester SO21 1JH UK
                [4 ]Departamento de Biologia e Zoologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Av. Fernando, Corrêa da Costa, 2367, Boa Esperança 78060‐900 Cuiabá MT Brazil
                [5 ]Lancaster Environment Centre University of Lancaster Lancaster LA1 AYQ UK
                Article
                10.1002/ecs2.2491
                38357012
                6f42cd5a-c06d-4233-98fa-35227c57486f
                © 2018

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article