10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Diabetes Care Barriers, Use, and Health Outcomes in Younger Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , PhD 2 , , , PhD 3 , , MD, MPH 4 , , MS 2 , , RPh, PhD 4 , , PhD 5 , , MD, MPH 6 , , PhD, MPH 7 , , PhD 8 , , PhD 9 , , MD 10 , , PhD 2 , , MD, PhD 5 , , MD, PhD 11 , Writing Committee for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group and the TODAY Study Group
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines health, socioeconomic, structural, and other factors associated with access to and use of diabetes care in younger adults.

          Key Points

          Question

          How do health care coverage, access to, and use of diabetes care vary by diabetes type in younger adults, and what are their associations with glycemic control, as assessed by glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) levels?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 1371 participants in 2 large, national cohorts, less health care coverage, access to, and use of diabetes care were reported in individuals with type 2 diabetes compared with those with type 1 diabetes. Less access was associated with higher HbA 1c levels, and state-level Medicaid expansion after the Affordable Care Act was associated with higher frequencies of health care coverage and lower HbA 1c levels.

          Meaning

          Findings of this study suggest that increased access to diabetes care, such as through Medicaid expansion, is associated with improved health outcomes in younger adults with diabetes.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Treatment challenges exist for younger adults with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Health care coverage, access to, and use of diabetes care are not well delineated in these high-risk populations.

          Objective

          To compare patterns of health care coverage, access to, and use of diabetes care and determine their associations with glycemia among younger adults with T1D and with T2D.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study analyzed data from a survey that was jointly developed by 2 large, national cohort studies: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study, an observational study of individuals with youth-onset T1D or T2D, and the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) study, a randomized clinical trial (2004-2011) followed by an observational study (2012-2020). The interviewer-directed survey was administered during in-person study visits in both studies between 2017 and 2019. Data analyses were performed between May 2021 and October 2022.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Survey questions addressed health care coverage, usual sources of diabetes care, and frequency of care use. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) levels were assayed in a central laboratory. Patterns of health care factors and HbA 1c levels were compared by diabetes type.

          Results

          The analysis included 1371 participants (mean [range] age, 25 [18-36] years; 824 females [60.1%]), of whom 661 had T1D and 250 had T2D from the SEARCH study and 460 had T2D from the TODAY study. Participants had a mean (SD) diabetes duration of 11.8 (2.8) years. More participants with T1D than T2D in both the SEARCH and TODAY studies reported health care coverage (94.7%, 81.6%, and 86.7%), access to diabetes care (94.7%, 78.1%, and 73.4%), and use of diabetes care (88.1%, 80.5%, and 73.6%). Not having health care coverage was associated with significantly higher mean (SE) HbA 1c levels in participants with T1D in the SEARCH study (no coverage, 10.8% [0.5%]; public, 9.4% [0.2%]; private, 8.7% [0.1%]; P < .001) and participants with T2D from the TODAY study (no coverage, 9.9% [0.3%]; public, 8.7% [0.2%]; private, 8.7% [0.2%]; P = .004). Medicaid expansion vs without expansion was associated with more health care coverage (participants with T1D: 95.8% vs 90.2%; participants with T2D in SEARCH: 86.1% vs 73.9%; participants with T2D in TODAY: 93.6% vs 74.2%) and lower HbA 1c levels (participants with T1D: 9.2% vs 9.7%; participants with T2D in SEARCH: 8.4% vs 9.3%; participants with T2D in TODAY: 8.7% vs 9.3%). The T1D group incurred higher median (IQR) monthly out-of-pocket expenses than the T2D group ($74.50 [$10.00-$309.00] vs $10.00 [$0-$74.50]).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          Results of this study suggested that lack of health care coverage and of an established source of diabetes care were associated with significantly higher HbA 1c levels for participants with T1D, but inconsistent results were found for participants with T2D. Increased access to diabetes care (eg, through Medicaid expansion) may be associated with improved health outcomes, but additional strategies are needed, particularly for individuals with T2D.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

          Long-term microvascular and neurologic complications cause major morbidity and mortality in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We examined whether intensive treatment with the goal of maintaining blood glucose concentrations close to the normal range could decrease the frequency and severity of these complications. A total of 1441 patients with IDDM--726 with no retinopathy at base line (the primary-prevention cohort) and 715 with mild retinopathy (the secondary-intervention cohort) were randomly assigned to intensive therapy administered either with an external insulin pump or by three or more daily insulin injections and guided by frequent blood glucose monitoring or to conventional therapy with one or two daily insulin injections. The patients were followed for a mean of 6.5 years, and the appearance and progression of retinopathy and other complications were assessed regularly. In the primary-prevention cohort, intensive therapy reduced the adjusted mean risk for the development of retinopathy by 76 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 62 to 85 percent), as compared with conventional therapy. In the secondary-intervention cohort, intensive therapy slowed the progression of retinopathy by 54 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 39 to 66 percent) and reduced the development of proliferative or severe nonproliferative retinopathy by 47 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 14 to 67 percent). In the two cohorts combined, intensive therapy reduced the occurrence of microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion of > or = 40 mg per 24 hours) by 39 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 21 to 52 percent), that of albuminuria (urinary albumin excretion of > or = 300 mg per 24 hours) by 54 percent (95 percent confidence interval 19 to 74 percent), and that of clinical neuropathy by 60 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 74 percent). The chief adverse event associated with intensive therapy was a two-to-threefold increase in severe hypoglycemia. Intensive therapy effectively delays the onset and slows the progression of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in patients with IDDM.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence Trends of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes among Youths, 2002–2012

            Diagnoses of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in youths present a substantial clinical and public health burden. The prevalence of these diseases increased in the 2001-2009 period, but data on recent incidence trends are lacking.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                5 May 2023
                May 2023
                5 May 2023
                : 6
                : 5
                : e2312147
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle
                [2 ]The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland
                [3 ]Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [4 ]Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [5 ]Lifecourse Epidemiology of Adiposity and Diabetes Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
                [6 ]Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [7 ]Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
                [8 ]Division of Health Services Research, New York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola
                [9 ]Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
                [10 ]Diabetes Center Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
                [11 ]University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: March 24, 2023.
                Published: May 5, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12147
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Pihoker C et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Barbara H. Braffett, PhD, The Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, 6110 Executive Blvd, Ste 750, Rockville, MD 20852 ( braffett@ 123456bsc.gwu.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Pihoker and Braffett had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Pihoker, Braffett, Songer, Herman, Jensen, Divers, Zhang, Dabelea.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Braffett, Songer, Herman, Tung, Kuo, Bellatorre, Isganaitis, Jensen, Divers, Zhang, Nathan, Drews, Dabelea, Zeitler.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Pihoker, Braffett, Songer, Tung, Kuo, Isganaitis.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pihoker, Braffett, Songer, Herman, Kuo, Bellatorre, Isganaitis, Jensen, Divers, Zhang, Nathan, Drews, Dabelea, Zeitler.
                Statistical analysis: Braffett, Songer, Tung, Divers, Zhang.
                Obtained funding: Pihoker, Braffett, Jensen, Nathan, Dabelea, Zeitler.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Pihoker, Herman, Bellatorre, Dabelea, Zeitler.
                Supervision: Pihoker, Isganaitis, Nathan, Drews, Zeitler.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Braffett reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Herman reported receiving personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme outside the submitted work. Dr Jensen reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the conduct of the study. Dr Nathan reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the NIH during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study (1R01DK127208-01, 1UC4DK108173) was funded by the NIH, NIDDK and supported by the CDC. The Population Based Registry of Diabetes in Youth Study (1U18DP006131, U18DP006133, U18DP006134, U18DP006136, U18DP006138, U18DP006139) is funded by the CDC (DP-15-002) and supported by the NIH/NIDDK. The TODAY study was funded by grants U01-DK61212, U01-DK61230, U01-DK61239, U01-DK61242, and U01DK61254 from the NIH/NIDDK.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The NIDDK project office had a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC and NIDDK.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: The TODAY Study Group thanks the following companies for donations in support of the study’s efforts: Becton, Dickinson and Company; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; GlaxoSmithKline; LifeScan Inc; Pfizer; and Sanofi Aventis. The American Indian partners of the clinical center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center participated in and provided guidance to the study, including members of the Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Cherokee Nation, Chickasaw Nation, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, and Oklahoma City Area Indian Health Service.
                Article
                zoi230378
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12147
                10163384
                37145592
                6d62c410-020a-493f-87ab-1b8ee7e1b798
                Copyright 2023 Pihoker C et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 4 November 2022
                : 24 March 2023
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Diabetes and Endocrinology

                Comments

                Comment on this article