11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Non-Specialization of Criminal Careers Among Intimate Partner Violence Offenders

      1 , 2 , 3
      Criminal Justice and Behavior
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Many men arrested for intimate partner violence (IPV) commit other types of criminal offenses as well. We examined 93 IPV offenders’ general offending and tested the ability of criminal career trajectory and an IPV-specific risk assessment (Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment [ODARA]) to predict post-index recidivism 7.5 years later. Most (71%) had pre-index criminal charges, and most (62%) had post-index criminal recidivism, although fewer (24%) committed post-index IPV. Pre-index criminal career (defined as none, non-violent, violent, IPV) did not predict post-index IPV, whereas the ODARA predicted post-index IPV, area under the curve (AUC = .67), as well as other offenses with a moderate or large effect size, including stalking (AUC = .78), sexual assault (AUC = .67), and non-violent offenses (AUC = .74). In line with prior research findings, we conclude that many men arrested for IPV do not specialize in their criminal careers and that risk assessment in these cases could include risk of both IPV and other offenses. Furthermore, the ODARA holds promise for assessing general risk of recidivism among IPV offenders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r.

            In order to facilitate comparisons across follow-up studies that have used different measures of effect size, we provide a table of effect size equivalencies for the three most common measures: ROC area (AUC), Cohen's d, and r. We outline why AUC is the preferred measure of predictive or diagnostic accuracy in forensic psychology or psychiatry, and we urge researchers and practitioners to use numbers rather than verbal labels to characterize effect sizes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.).

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Criminal Justice and Behavior
                Criminal Justice and Behavior
                SAGE Publications
                0093-8548
                1552-3594
                October 2016
                July 09 2016
                October 2016
                : 43
                : 10
                : 1347-1363
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Toronto
                [2 ]Waypoint Research Institute
                [3 ]Ontario Provincial Police
                Article
                10.1177/0093854816637886
                6ae5f1e0-6278-4e3f-b867-e3e9ce8e2d33
                © 2016

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article