61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Telehealth Interventions to Improve Obstetric and Gynecologic Health Outcomes : A Systematic Review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Telehealth interventions were associated with improvements in obstetric outcomes, perinatal smoking cessation, breastfeeding, early access to medical abortion services, and schedule optimization for high-risk obstetrics.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE:

          To systematically review the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for improving obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes.

          DATA SOURCES:

          We conducted a comprehensive search for primary literature in ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE.

          METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:

          Qualifying primary studies had a comparison group, were conducted in countries ranked very high on the United Nations Human Development Index, published in English, and evaluated obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes. Cochrane Collaboration's tool and ROBINS-I tool were used for assessing risk of bias. Summary of evidence tables were created using the United States Preventive Services Task Force Summary of Evidence Table for Evidence Reviews.

          TABULATION, INTEGRATION, RESULTS:

          Of the 3,926 published abstracts identified, 47 met criteria for inclusion and included 31,967 participants. Telehealth interventions overall improved obstetric outcomes related to smoking cessation and breastfeeding. Telehealth interventions decreased the need for high-risk obstetric monitoring office visits while maintaining maternal and fetal outcomes. One study found reductions in diagnosed preeclampsia among women with gestational hypertension. Telehealth interventions were effective for continuation of oral and injectable contraception; one text-based study found increased oral contraception rates at 6 months. Telehealth provision of medication abortion services had similar clinical outcomes compared with in-person care and improved access to early abortion. Few studies suggested utility for telehealth to improve notification of sexually transmitted infection test results and app-based intervention to improve urinary incontinence symptoms.

          CONCLUSION:

          Telehealth interventions were associated with improvements in obstetric outcomes, perinatal smoking cessation, breastfeeding, early access to medical abortion services, and schedule optimization for high-risk obstetrics. Further well-designed studies are needed to examine these interventions and others to generate evidence that can inform decisions about implementation of newer telehealth technologies into obstetrics and gynecology practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          mHealth Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study in Physically Inactive Pregnant Women

          Introduction Physical inactivity is prevalent in pregnant women, and innovative strategies to promote physical activity are strongly needed. The purpose of the study was to test a 12-week mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention for feasibility and potential efficacy. Methods Participants were recruited between December 2012 and February 2014 using diverse recruitment methods. Thirty pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation were randomized to an intervention (mobile phone app plus Fitbit) or a control (Fitbit) group. Both conditions targeted gradual increases in physical activity. The mHealth intervention included daily messages and a mobile phone activity diary with automated feedback and self-monitoring systems. Results On monthly average, 4 women were screened for initial eligibility by telephone and 2.5 were randomized. Intervention participants had a 1096 ± 1898 step increase in daily steps compared to an increase of 259 ± 1604 steps in control participants at 12 weeks. The change between groups in weekly mean steps per day during the 12-week study period was not statistically significant ( p = 0.38). The intervention group reported lower perceived barrier to being active, lack of energy, than the control group at 12-week visit ( p = 0.02). The rates of responding to daily messages and using the daily diary through the mobile app declined during the 12 week study period. Discussion It was difficult to recruit and randomize inactive women who wanted to increase physical activity during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were motivated to increase physical activity might find using mobile technologies in assessing and promoting PA acceptable. Possible reasons for the non-significant treatment effect of the mHealth intervention on physical activity are discussed. Public awareness of safety and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy should be promoted. Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier NCT01461707.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of short message service on infant feeding practice: findings from a community-based study in Shanghai, China.

            Appropriate infant feeding practices have the potential for long-term health effects. However, research findings on improving early infant feeding practices are limited. The wide use of mobile phone short message service (SMS) provides new opportunities for health promotion and services. To assess the effect of an SMS intervention on infant feeding practices. Quasiexperimental design with follow-up measures scheduled at 4, 6, and 12 months at 4 community health centers in Shanghai, China. Two community health centers represented the intervention group, and 2 other community health centers represented the control group. In total, 582 expectant mothers were recruited during the first trimester. Expectant mothers were eligible to participate if they owned a mobile phone, were first-time mothers, conceived a singleton fetus, were older than 20 years and less than 13 weeks' gestation, had completed at least a compulsory junior high school education, and had no illness that limited breastfeeding after childbirth. Mothers in the intervention group received weekly SMS messages about infant feeding from the third trimester to 12 months' post partum. The primary outcome was the duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). Survival analysis was used to compare the duration of EBF between the intervention group and the control group. Compared with the control group, the intervention group had a significantly longer median duration of EBF at 6 months (11.41 [95% CI, 10.25-12.57] vs 8.87 [95% CI, 7.84-9.89] weeks). The hazard ratio for stopping EBF in the intervention group was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.97). The intervention resulted in a significantly higher rate of EBF at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.45-4.91]) and a significantly lower rate of the introduction of solid foods before 4 months (adjusted odds ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.08-0.94]). An SMS intervention may be effective in promoting EBF, delaying the introduction of solid foods, increasing awareness of the World Health Organization breastfeeding guidelines, and improving knowledge of appropriate infant feeding practices for new mothers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of a daily smartphone-based feedback system among women with gestational diabetes on compliance, glycemic control, satisfaction, and pregnancy outcome: a randomized controlled trial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Obstet Gynecol
                Obstet Gynecol
                ong
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0029-7844
                1873-233X
                February 2020
                23 January 2020
                : 135
                : 2
                : 371-382
                Affiliations
                Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Northwest, Portland, Oregon; and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, District of Columbia.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Nathaniel DeNicola, MD, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, George Washington University, Washington, DC; email: ndenicola@ 123456mfa.gwu.edu .
                Article
                ONG-19-1212 00016
                10.1097/AOG.0000000000003646
                7012339
                31977782
                69ac97e9-8c7a-49f6-ad32-e255141ac00d
                © 2020 by The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

                History
                : 27 June 2019
                : 09 September 2019
                : 19 September 2019
                Categories
                Contents
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                Comments

                Comment on this article