Comparison of Primary Duet Lens Procedures: In-The-Bag Monofocal with Sulcus Multifocal, and Standard Single Multifocal Lens for Cataract Surgery

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of primary duet intraocular lens (IOL) procedure using an in-The-bag monofocal IOL and a sulcus-based multifocal reversible platform for cataract surgery. The visual outcomes were compared with a single in-The-bag multifocal IOL.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients who underwent primary duet IOL procedures were compared with consecutive patients who underwent single multifocal IOL surgery. Primary outcomes were uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA), refraction and spherical equivalent data. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications.

Results

The study group consisted of 32 eyes (22 toric IOLs) whilst the control group had 57 eyes (29 toric IOLs). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on post-operative 1-month and 1-year UDVA ( p=0.1522 and 0.4926, respectively) and UNVA ( p=0.1248 and 0.2738, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative 1-month spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 diopter ( p=0.1891). Postoperative intraocular pressure spikes were observed on day-1 in both groups, with most returned to their baseline at 1-month and all were normal at 1-year post surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in intraocular pressure between the two groups on day-1, 1-month and 1-year after surgery ( p=0.6421). There were no statistically significant differences in the IOL axis deviation from the intended axis in the toric subgroup analysis ( p=0.5843).

Conclusion

Primary duet IOL procedure is equally effective and safe in correcting distance and near vision when compared with single multifocal IOL in the capsular bag.