1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characterization of a G2M checkpoint-related gene model and subtypes associated with immunotherapy response for clear cell renal cell carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) presents challenges in early diagnosis and effective treatment. In this study, we aimed to establish a prognostic model based on G2M checkpoint-related genes and identify associated clusters in ccRCC through clinical bioinformatic analysis and experimental validation. Utilizing a single-cell RNA dataset (GSE159115) and bulk-sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, we analyzed the G2M checkpoint pathway in ccRCC. Differential expression analysis identified 45 genes associated with the G2M checkpoint, leading to the construction of a predictive model with four key genes (E2F2, GTSE1, RAD54L, and UBE2C). The model demonstrated reliable predictive ability for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival, with AUC values of 0.794, 0.790, and 0.794, respectively. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited a worse prognosis, accompanied by significant differences in immune cell infiltration, immune function, TIDE and IPS scores, and drug sensitivities. Two clusters of ccRCC were identified using the "ConsensusClusterPlus" package, cluster 1 exhibited a worse survival rate and was resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs of Axitinib, Erlotinib, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, and Temsirolimus, but not Sorafenib. Targeted experiments on RAD54L, a gene involved in DNA repair processes, revealed its crucial role in inhibiting proliferation, invasion, and migration in 786-O cells. In conclusion, our study offers valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying ccRCC, identifying potential prognostic genes and molecular subtypes associated with the G2M checkpoint. These findings hold promise for guiding personalized treatment strategies in the management of ccRCC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Renal cell carcinoma

          Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) denotes cancer originated from the renal epithelium and accounts for >90% of cancers in the kidney. The disease encompasses >10 histological and molecular subtypes, of which clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is most common and accounts for most cancer-related deaths. Although somatic VHL mutations have been described for some time, more-recent cancer genomic studies have identified mutations in epigenetic regulatory genes and demonstrated marked intra-tumour heterogeneity, which could have prognostic, predictive and therapeutic relevance. Localized RCC can be successfully managed with surgery, whereas metastatic RCC is refractory to conventional chemotherapy. However, over the past decade, marked advances in the treatment of metastatic RCC have been made, with targeted agents including sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, pazopanib and axitinib, which inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR), and everolimus and temsirolimus, which inhibit mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), being approved. Since 2015, agents with additional targets aside from VEGFR have been approved, such as cabozantinib and lenvatinib; immunotherapies, such as nivolumab, have also been added to the armamentarium for metastatic RCC. Here, we provide an overview of the biology of RCC, with a focus on ccRCC, as well as updates to complement the current clinical guidelines and an outline of potential future directions for RCC research and therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints.

            DNA damage is a relatively common event in the life of a cell and may lead to mutation, cancer, and cellular or organismic death. Damage to DNA induces several cellular responses that enable the cell either to eliminate or cope with the damage or to activate a programmed cell death process, presumably to eliminate cells with potentially catastrophic mutations. These DNA damage response reactions include: (a) removal of DNA damage and restoration of the continuity of the DNA duplex; (b) activation of a DNA damage checkpoint, which arrests cell cycle progression so as to allow for repair and prevention of the transmission of damaged or incompletely replicated chromosomes; (c) transcriptional response, which causes changes in the transcription profile that may be beneficial to the cell; and (d) apoptosis, which eliminates heavily damaged or seriously deregulated cells. DNA repair mechanisms include direct repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair, and cross-link repair. The DNA damage checkpoints employ damage sensor proteins, such as ATM, ATR, the Rad17-RFC complex, and the 9-1-1 complex, to detect DNA damage and to initiate signal transduction cascades that employ Chk1 and Chk2 Ser/Thr kinases and Cdc25 phosphatases. The signal transducers activate p53 and inactivate cyclin-dependent kinases to inhibit cell cycle progression from G1 to S (the G1/S checkpoint), DNA replication (the intra-S checkpoint), or G2 to mitosis (the G2/M checkpoint). In this review the molecular mechanisms of DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints in mammalian cells are analyzed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clear cell renal cell carcinoma ontogeny and mechanisms of lethality

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                05 April 2024
                15 April 2024
                05 April 2024
                : 10
                : 7
                : e29289
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Urology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510317, China
                [b ]The Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510317, China
                [c ]The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
                [d ]Center of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Gaozhou, 525200, Guangdong, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Center of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Gaozhou People's Hospital, No. 89, Xiguan Road, Gaozhou, Guangdong, Gaozhou 525200, Guangdong, China. zhzhong84@ 123456163.com
                [** ]Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, No.466 Xingang Middle Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510317, Guangdong, China. xfqiu123@ 123456163.com
                [1]

                Co-first authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                S2405-8440(24)05320-9 e29289
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29289
                11015143
                38617927
                68c20777-5183-4146-9d15-6f46b0f3e697
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 February 2024
                : 28 March 2024
                : 4 April 2024
                Categories
                Research Article

                clear cell renal carcinoma,g2m checkpoint,cell cycle,immune infiltration,drug sensitivity

                Comments

                Comment on this article