1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Presence of centromeric but absence of telomeric group B KIR haplotypes in stem cell donors improve leukaemia control after HSCT for childhood ALL.

      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 4 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 2 , 16 , 3 , 16 , 3 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 13 , 4 , 6 , 20 , 15 , 21 , 22 , 23
      Bone marrow transplantation
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) provides high cure rates for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), relapses remain the main cause of treatment failure. Whereas donor killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotype was shown to impact on relapse incidence in adult myeloid leukaemia similar studies in paediatric ALL are largely missing. Effect of donor KIR genotype on transplant outcome was evaluated in 317 children receiving a first myeloablative HSCT from an HLA-matched unrelated donor or sibling within the prospective ALL-SCT-BFM-2003 trial. Analysis of donor KIR gene polymorphism revealed that centromeric presence and telomeric absence of KIR B haplotypes was associated with reduced relapse risk. A centromeric/telomeric KIR score (ct-KIR score) integrating these observations correlated with relapse risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; P = 0.002) while it had no impact on graft-versus-host disease or non-relapse mortality. In multivariable analyses ct-KIR score was associated with reduced relapse risk (HR 0.58; P = 0.003) and a trend towards improved event-free survival (HR 0.76; P = 0.059). This effect proved independent of MRD level prior to HSCT. Our data suggest that in children with ALL undergoing HSCT after myeloablative conditioning, donor selection based on KIR genotyping holds promise to improve clinical outcome by decreasing relapse risk and prolonged event-free survival.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Bone Marrow Transplant
          Bone marrow transplantation
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1476-5365
          0268-3369
          November 2019
          : 54
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Therapy, Clinic for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. florian.babor@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
          [2 ] Department of Paediatrics, St. Anna Children's Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
          [3 ] Institute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
          [4 ] Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
          [5 ] Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
          [6 ] Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
          [7 ] Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner'sches Kinderspital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, Munich, Germany.
          [8 ] Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
          [9 ] Division of Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
          [10 ] Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
          [11 ] Department of Paediatrics III, University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
          [12 ] Children's Hospital, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
          [13 ] Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
          [14 ] Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine & Immunogenetics Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
          [15 ] Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
          [16 ] Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Therapy, Clinic for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
          [17 ] Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Children's Hospital, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
          [18 ] Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
          [19 ] Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
          [20 ] Clinic for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
          [21 ] Department of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunology, Children's Hospital, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
          [22 ] Institute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. markus.uhrberg@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
          [23 ] Division of Pediatric Stem Cell Therapy, Clinic for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. meisel@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
          Article
          10.1038/s41409-019-0543-z
          10.1038/s41409-019-0543-z
          31089287
          67dc4f06-c104-44ba-af52-06911d7ecbd2
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article