0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in patients with ovarian vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The role of anticoagulation in ovarian vein thrombosis (OVT) is uncertain.

          Objectives

          We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in OVT patients.

          Methods

          A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to April 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies enrolling at least 10 adult patients with objectively diagnosed OVT and treated with any anticoagulants. The protocol was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021270883).

          Results

          We included 17 observational studies (621 anticoagulated and 376 nonanticoagulated OVT patients); 9 studies enrolled mainly pregnancy/puerperium-related OVT. Most patients received heparins alone (45.7%) or proceeded to vitamin K antagonists (39.2%). The average treatment duration was ≤3 months in 8 studies (47.1%), >3 to ≤6 months in 6 studies (35.3%), and >6 months in 3 studies (17.6%). In treated patients, mortality rate was 2.43% (95% CI, 0.54%-5.41%; I 2 = 53.8%; 12/406 patients; 13 studies), major bleeding was 1.27% (95% CI, 0.48%-2.38%; I 2 = 2.5%; 7/583 patients; 15 studies), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 3.49% (95% CI, 1.12%-6.95%; I 2 = 63.5%; 22/482 patients; 15 studies), and vessel recanalization was 89.4% (95% CI, 74.6%-98.6%; I 2 = 80.6%; 163/184 patients; 8 studies). The rate of recurrent VTE in untreated patients was 8.65% (95% CI, 2.61%-17.35%); however, the difference compared with treated patients was not statistically significant (risk ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.37). At subgroup analyses, the rates of major bleeding and recurrent VTE were 0.80% (95% CI, 0.0-2%.17%) and 3.81% (95% CI, 0.42%-9.63%) in pregnancy/puerperium-related OVT, respectively, and 1.12% (95% CI, 0.32%-2.34%) and 1.78% (95% CI, 0.62%-3.46%), respectively, when analyzing only full-text studies.

          Conclusion

          There is paucity of literature regarding OVT. Our results suggest that anticoagulation is associated with low rates of major bleeding and recurrent VTE.

          Graphical abstract

          Essentials

          • The role of anticoagulant treatment in patients with ovarian vein thrombosis is uncertain.

          • We conducted a meta-analysis of 17 observational studies enrolling 621 anticoagulated ovarian vein thrombosis patients.

          • Most patients received heparins or vitamin K antagonists, with average duration of up to 3 months.

          • Anticoagulation was associated with low major bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                @NicolettaRivaMD
                @GattAlexander
                @jeancallejaagiu
                Journal
                Res Pract Thromb Haemost
                Res Pract Thromb Haemost
                Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
                Elsevier
                2475-0379
                01 July 2024
                July 2024
                01 July 2024
                : 8
                : 5
                : 102501
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
                [2 ]Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
                [3 ]Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
                [4 ]Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA
                [5 ]Laboratory of Blood and Vascular Biology, Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA
                [6 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
                [7 ]Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
                [8 ]Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
                [10 ]Thrombosis Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
                [11 ]Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA
                [12 ]Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Amiens University Center, Picardie Jules Verne University, Amiens, France
                [13 ]Internal Medicine and Thrombosis, Medical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence Nicoletta Riva, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, MSD2080, Malta. nico.riva@ 123456hotmail.it @NicolettaRivaMD nicoletta.riva@ 123456um.edu.mt
                Article
                S2475-0379(24)00196-1 102501
                10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102501
                11339252
                39175528
                674e21e4-ef9e-4caa-a3fe-25531fb0ad55
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 February 2024
                : 24 May 2024
                : 14 June 2024
                Categories
                Original Article

                anticoagulants,meta-analysis,ovary,systematic review,venous thromboembolism

                Comments

                Comment on this article